Guest guest Posted October 17, 2000 Report Share Posted October 17, 2000 Arlene, I've been reading about and her exquisite school experiences for some time now, and I'm really happy for you and her both. As for the class trip, I think you have to be realistic. Other parents are not invited because their children don't need the help that does. And it is unfair to assume that the school will pay for an aide -- or that an aide will even be available for such a lengthy trip. This is really your responsibility, to go if you want her to go. I would be happy that is being allowed to go if you can handle the requirements. I say, go. You'd probably have a great time. CK, Mom to Ian (2/89), (9/90), and Rose (6/94) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2000 Report Share Posted October 17, 2000 Hi! That really sucks! In the U.S., that would be discriminatory and illegal. Given the general enlightenedness of Canada, you might want to do a little investigating. Although this is painful, and it's hard not to take personally, don't give up just yet. Appraoch this as a negotiation explain to them their legal responsebilities as well as the ethics of their decision. Whether they realize it or not, they are discriminating against Shan and in effect saying that she is less worthy or valuable than the non-disabled kids. Given how much they like Shan (it shouldn't be about like or dislike but, what the heck make the most of the assets you have), I think they will think twice when they see the bigger picture and what their decision truly says about they themselves. Take care, Kent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2000 Report Share Posted October 17, 2000 Oooooooh Arlene, I'd like to tell them to take that stinken trip and stick it where the sun don't shine!!! Ok now that I got that off my chest my grandma always said you catch more flies with honey then vinegar so I ditto everything Kent said. Shan deserves to go on this trip so you go get 'em girl. And you just tuck all of us in your pocket when you go talk to them. Tena On 17 Oct 2000, at 22:48, Kent Moreno wrote: > Hi! > > That really sucks! In the U.S., that would be discriminatory and > illegal. > Given the general enlightenedness of Canada, you might want to do a > little investigating. > > Although this is painful, and it's hard not to take personally, don't > give up just yet. Appraoch this as a negotiation explain to them > their legal responsebilities as well as the ethics of their decision. > Whether they realize it or not, they are discriminating against Shan > and in effect saying that she is less worthy or valuable than the > non-disabled kids. Given how much they like Shan (it shouldn't be > about like or dislike but, what the heck make the most of the assets > you have), I think they will think twice when they see the bigger > picture and what their decision truly says about they themselves. > > Take care, > > > Kent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2000 Report Share Posted October 18, 2000 Arlene, We had to do some serious thinking last year about a class trip to New York city. This is something the 6th grade class was doing and as a member of the 6th grade class Sheila was invited to go. However there was major reluctance on the part of our school to take her. Our school has overall done a great job of including Sheila, but this was just more than they wanted to take on unless either my hubby or I would go wtih them. Since it was cost over $500 I wasn't really interested in going. ;-) After thinking about it I decided that Sheila would hate all the walking around and the museums they planned to see. So, was I interested in Sheila's participation for inclusions sake or for Sheila's sake? I finally decided that Sheila would not attend. The district heard this as she would stay home and not attend school while the class was on their trip. This is when I pointed out at any other children not going would be expected to be in school, right? Did they really want to open up that legal pandora's box? They decided right quick that they would be able to figure out something for Sheila. ;-) I remember feeling really bad initially, feeling that maybe as wonderful as they have been their attitudes still weren't really endorsing inclusion. But eventually I decided that if I reframed this to their concern about how Sheila would physically and emotionally handle the trip made more sense to me. Good luck with finding a solution that works for you and . nancy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2000 Report Share Posted October 19, 2000 Arlene, I am so sorry about this. Shan should be able to go without her mom just like everyone else for her $302.00. I know that this is difficult for you both and I am sorry they weren't thinking right on this. This school has been great to her in so many ways it is just a shame that they messed up on this one There have been a lot of things going on with us lately and I am about at the end of my rope. You know the " straw that broke the camels back " ? Well, yesterday came off the bus with more complaints (by the aide and driver) that I bawled for over an hour. Silly huh? I just get tired sometimes. It is very difficult to have other view your child as a " problem " . I know the feeling and I am with you 100% that this was wrong of them. Keep your chin up my friend. Dawn (mom to 7ds) class trip Last week a form came home to tell parents that a class trip for 3 days in April is in the works ...going to Ottawa. Okay..after major thoughts of all this and that...and thinking of who must think what and blah blah...we come to the conclusion that Since shan is fully intergraded that we should at least go to the information night to find out more details about the trip, right? we have decided that she can go! HORRRAY!!! we are going to let our sweet muffin go with her friends to Ottawa. so, we find out the price...$302.00 per person..okay a little steep but we can swing it, after all, she will be with her friends having a blast. the information night looked great :-))) talked all about what they will be doing. an itinerary will come home and have hour by hour of what they will be doing. Big coach bus with tv and vcrs on the bus :-) The whole thing sounds very exciting for . sooo, after the meeting the teacher says...do you plan on letting shannon go on the trip? i am thinking the teacher is thrilled i have loosened my apron strings and am being so brave to let her go.... well i say yes i am considering it.... the teacher says are you willing to go with her. i say no. then i say, since shannon has two aides would one of them be going with her? how would this work for shannon? Teacher says i need to talk to principal for that. hmmm so i walk over to principal and i say....who would be with shannon for the class trip? she says YOU are not planning on going? i say no ..are other parent volunteers going? noooo, no parents are allowed on the trip. just 3 teachers and 22 or so kids. hmmm no parents? why am i invited? HA! well....principal doesn t think that funding would pay for an aide for shannon for the trip because the aide would be working more then 8 hours per day and how much money would they have to pay the aide..and with cut backs...etc...i about heard enough at that point. :-( here i was..so excited that i finally made the decision to let her go. thinking they wanted her so badly to go and i would be the bad mommy for saying no. so i say yes, and i suppose the wanted answer from me was a no. i told the principal that she should check her resources and see if there was funding for shannons aide to go. and if not, then i would like in a letter the detailed information as to why shannon cannot go. okay so i come home...bawling my eyes out thinking this is just not fair. I really dont want to go to Ottawa if no other parents are allowed to go. I think everyone else's 302.00 bucks is good enough but not shannons. then i think gosh arlene just think, you are saving 400 bucks for shannon to not go and here you sit crying about it. then i think go grab the communication book and tell them to NOT even look for any resources cuz shan AINT GOING with them anyhow! the happiness of tonights meeting was washed away pretty quick. inclusion doesnt really mean included with everything i suppose. Arlene i don't usually suffer from " poor shan syndrome " but i am tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2000 Report Share Posted October 19, 2000 hi not sure if this is helpful..... i was looking in the wrightslaw book about something else. i saw this on page 192 under LRE " Sec300.553 Nonacademic settings. In providing or arranging for the provision of nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities, including meals, recess periods, and the services and activities set forth in Sec.300.306, each public agency shall ensure that each child with a disability participates with nondisabled children in those services and actitiviess to a maximum extent appropriate to the needs of that child (Authority:20U.S.C. 1412 (a) (5) " i looked up Sec 300.306 Nonacademic services " (a) Each Public agency shall take steps to provide nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities in a manner necessary to afford children with disabilities an equal opportunity for participation in those services and activities. ( Nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities may include counseling services, athletics, transportation, health services, recreational aactivities, sepcial interest groups, or clubs sponsored by the public agency " .......... i took this straight from the book. slaw: Special Education Law i hope that it was OK that i quoted from the book. for what it is worth, when my older daughter went to st augustine on a 4th grade field trip, i went along with her. i also go on every field trip with alec. alec still needs VERY close supervision when he goes out to new places. Good luck with your decision. it is not an easy one. lori- mom to danielle (12 preteen) and alec (8DS) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2000 Report Share Posted October 19, 2000 Just had to respond.. My daughter Kaitlyn (7) DS who is only in K for 1/2 hour daily as most of you know.. was recently not even asked to attend the Kindergarten field trip. They were going to the local police station to learn about stranger danger. I found out about the trip on a fluke and when i asked where the permission slip was for Kaitlyn to attend, they asked HOW DID YOU FIND OUT ABOUT THE TRIP??? How dare them. What does that matter. I told them I had sources everywhere! And with persistence Kailtyn was permitted to go, but I had to go with her. Why does everything have to be a FIGHT?? And thank you for the slaw excerpts, I will be bringing them with me to the IEP. I also just found out there was a Kindergarten assembly given by the local Fire Dept.. Guess they didn't learn their lesson.. guess who was never asked to attend? I guess looking at firetrucks and learning about safety is too much for Downs Kids!! Come On! Tracey Mom to Kaitlyn (7) DS and (13) ----- Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 7:36 PM Subject: Re: class trip > hi not sure if this is helpful..... i was looking in the wrightslaw book > about something else. i saw this on page 192 under LRE > > " Sec300.553 Nonacademic settings. > > In providing or arranging for the provision of nonacademic and > extracurricular services and activities, including meals, recess periods, and > the services and activities set forth in Sec.300.306, each public agency > shall ensure that each child with a disability participates with nondisabled > children in those services and actitiviess to a maximum extent appropriate to > the needs of that child (Authority:20U.S.C. 1412 (a) (5) " > > i looked up Sec 300.306 Nonacademic services > > " (a) Each Public agency shall take steps to provide nonacademic and > extracurricular services and activities in a manner necessary to afford > children with disabilities an equal opportunity for participation in those > services and activities. > ( Nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities may include > counseling services, athletics, transportation, health services, > recreational aactivities, sepcial interest groups, or clubs sponsored by the > public agency " .......... > > i took this straight from the book. slaw: Special Education Law i > hope that it was OK that i quoted from the book. > > for what it is worth, when my older daughter went to st augustine on a 4th > grade field trip, i went along with her. i also go on every field trip with > alec. alec still needs VERY close supervision when he goes out to new > places. > > Good luck with your decision. it is not an easy one. > > > lori- mom to danielle (12 preteen) and alec (8DS) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2000 Report Share Posted October 22, 2000 Tracey, This is discrimination, that is a Civil Rights violation, carries much stronger punishment than violating an IEP!! You might want to mention that at your IEP meeting, if your daughter is intentionally deprived of the same educational opportunities the other children are given, you will file an OCR complaint!! Cheryl in VA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.