Guest guest Posted September 2, 2000 Report Share Posted September 2, 2000 Woman ends flagpole vigil after promise from district Saturday, September 02, 2000 By Janice Crompton, Post-Gazette Staff Writer The mother of a Washington County special needs student yesterday ended her five-day vigil strapped to a flagpole after McGuffey School District officials promised to hire a teacher of the deaf for her son. Deanna Lesneski, 47, of Buffalo, said district Director of Special Education Sheryl Fleck promised on video that the district would make a full-time nurse available and hire a teacher with a master's degree in education of the deaf for 7-year-old " Max " Lesneski, who has Down syndrome, asthma and a hearing disability. The teacher, who Lesneski said she met yesterday, also has two years' experience as a therapeutic staff support person and behavioral specialist for the deaf. The nurse will be responsible for administering Max's medication. Lesneski said she will meet with Fleck and other district officials Tuesday. She said Fleck promised that if the agreement was unsatisfactory, she could return to her protest after the meeting. Lesneski said state Department of Education and the Pennsylvania Society for the Deaf officials visited her yesterday and urged her to accept the agreement. They plan to review the agreement for compliance with a pact ironed out in February between the Lesneskis and the district. " I felt secure in my decision to temporarily leave until Tuesday, " said Lesneski. She said that although she's hopeful the deal will work out, she still plans to bring a lawn chair and jump ropes -- the items she used Monday to affix herself to the flagpole at Blaine-Buffalo Elementary School -- just in case. Lesneski's protest was sparked when Max had an asthma attack in school Monday and Lesneski said district officials informed her they would not be administering Max's medications this year -- allegations the district denied. Lesneski maintained the district mishandled her son's education by not providing him with a qualified sign-language interpreter, as required by federal law, and by refusing to administer his medications. She vowed not to end her protest, which drew dozens of supporters, until the district had a contract with a proficient sign-language aide. For now, Lesneski said, she's happy with the agreement, and eager to get back home. " I want to get a shower so bad I can't stand it, " she said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2000 Report Share Posted September 2, 2000 Hi, just to throw a little comment in here. It seems to me, (and remember this is only MY opinion!) that things have gone a trifle OTT in the other direction now. What this woman apparantly wanted was someone who could sign to act as intepreter for her son, so, i want one too, I got an unqualified but highly adaptable and willing to learn person. Whats with the qualified teacher of the deaf for what is basically only support work doing being asked to do the job? Seems a very expensive and over the top solution to me when there are (at least in the UK) far too few specialist teachers to go round as it is that to supply one teacher full time to one child is a bit much. And a full time nurse?!!! Why would he need a full time nurse unless his medical problems require full time nursing care in which case a full time nurse who can use sign language would probably save the state a lot of money! Not knocking mums efforts you understand, merely the response to them by the powers that be. sue Wong> > Woman ends flagpole vigil after promise > from district > > Saturday, September 02, 2000 > > By Janice Crompton, Post-Gazette Staff Writer > > The mother of a Washington County special needs > student yesterday ended > her five-day vigil strapped to a flagpole after > McGuffey School District > officials promised to hire a teacher of the deaf > for her son. > > Deanna Lesneski, 47, of Buffalo, said district > Director of Special Education > Sheryl Fleck promised on video that the district > would make a full-time nurse > available and hire a teacher with a master's > degree in education of the deaf for > 7-year-old " Max " Lesneski, who has Down > syndrome, asthma and a > hearing disability. > > The teacher, who Lesneski said she met yesterday, > also has two years' > experience as a therapeutic staff support person > and behavioral specialist for > the deaf. The nurse will be responsible for > administering Max's medication. > > Lesneski said she will meet with Fleck and other > district officials Tuesday. > > She said Fleck promised that if the agreement was > unsatisfactory, she could > return to her protest after the meeting. > > Lesneski said state Department of Education and > the Pennsylvania Society for > the Deaf officials visited her yesterday and urged > her to accept the agreement. > > They plan to review the agreement for compliance > with a pact ironed out in > February between the Lesneskis and the district. > > " I felt secure in my decision to temporarily leave > until Tuesday, " said Lesneski. > She said that although she's hopeful the deal will > work out, she still plans to > bring a lawn chair and jump ropes -- the items she > used Monday to affix > herself to the flagpole at Blaine-Buffalo > Elementary School -- just in case. > > Lesneski's protest was sparked when Max had an > asthma attack in school > Monday and Lesneski said district officials > informed her they would not be > administering Max's medications this year -- > allegations the district denied. > > Lesneski maintained the district mishandled her > son's education by not > providing him with a qualified sign-language > interpreter, as required by federal > law, and by refusing to administer his medications. > > She vowed not to end her protest, which drew > dozens of supporters, until the > district had a contract with a proficient > sign-language aide. > > For now, Lesneski said, she's happy with the > agreement, and eager to get > back home. > > " I want to get a shower so bad I can't stand it, " > she said. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2000 Report Share Posted September 2, 2000 Sue, I see your point. I don't think a nurse is needed on site full time, a clinic aide who is well trained would be sufficient in my book. In cases of a true emergency, I'd prefer a paramedic over a nurse anyday. I would want someone who can get orders from an ER doctor and be able to administer whatever drugs or life saving techniques needed. I don't think this is a rural school, so one would tend to believe that a rescue squad is nearby. I can't really express an opinion on the hearing impaired teacher. I would think that a certified interpreter would be sufficient. I thought that was what the mother wanted..someone certified in ESL..not speficially a teacher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2000 Report Share Posted September 2, 2000 In a message dated 9/2/2000 11:34:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time, c1ndysue1@... writes: I see your point. I don't think a nurse is needed on site full time, a clinic aide who is well trained would be sufficient in my book. SNIP I can't really express an opinion on the hearing impaired teacher. I would think that a certified interpreter would be sufficient. ~~~~~~~~~~~ I agree with both and Sue. Lets don't forget the mtg has not happened yet, so they may at that time decide on a clinic aide/sign language aide. Rejoice! Amie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 Hi, My kids have never gone to a school that didn't have a school nurse on site. And I always thought that having a nurse at each school (or sometimes shared by two schools) was the rule rather than the exception. I'm sure this woman's son is not the only child who needs nursing contact time each day. For instance, in Washington, any child who needs medication administered during the school day goes to the nurse to get it. What with Ramona's medical needs, attendance at school would have been very difficult without a nurse handy. We grew to rely on this wonderful lady! But, she was not there just for my daughter...she was part of the staff in the first place. Take care, mom to Ramona 16ds, and two big sisters on their own c1ndysue1@... wrote: << I see your point. I don't think a nurse is needed on site full time, a clinic aide who is well trained would be sufficient in my book. In cases of a true emergency, I'd prefer a paramedic over a nurse anyday. I would want someone who can get orders from an ER doctor and be able to administer whatever drugs or life saving techniques needed. I don't think this is a rural school, so one would tend to believe that a rescue squad is nearby. >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 << My kids have never gone to a school that didn't have a school nurse on site. And I always thought that having a nurse at each school (or sometimes shared by two schools) was the rule rather than the exception. >> We have clinic aides in our schools. They administer the medication, call parents when kids are sick, take care of the sick kids until the parents arrive, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 Here we have school nurses present in the schools all day, in each and every school. I believe the flagpole mom's argument was over the fact that school refused to allow the child to self medicate or provide someone who would administer the medication. The bottom line is, what does the IEP say? Cheryl in VA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 9/3/00 9:13:38 AM Central Daylight Time, lumenasan@... writes: << Hi, My kids have never gone to a school that didn't have a school nurse on site. And I always thought that having a nurse at each school (or sometimes shared by two schools) was the rule rather than the exception. I'm sure this woman's son is not the only child who needs nursing contact time each day. For instance, in Washington, any child who needs medication administered during the school day goes to the nurse to get it. What with Ramona's medical needs, attendance at school would have been very difficult without a nurse handy. We grew to rely on this wonderful lady! But, she was not there just for my daughter...she was part of the staff in the first place. Take care, >> In our district each school doesn't have it's own full time nurse. In my foster son's school the nurse is there on Tues. and Thurs. She is available from another school on the other three days if she is needed. But, it would be a 20 minute drive for her to get there. There is a designated person in each school that is " trained " to give meds. Typically it is one of the secretaries. Karyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 9/3/2000 8:30:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time, wildwards@... writes: << I believe the flagpole mom's argument was over the fact that school refused to allow the child to self medicate or provide someone who would administer the medication. The bottom line is, what does the IEP say? Cheryl in VA >> The way I understand from my older kids is they are no longer able to 'self' medicate. (this is why you hear about kids sharing an aspirin with a friend or whatever and getting inot big trouble....part of the unsuccessful war on drugs i think, plus a liability thing) Since about 7 or 8 yrs. ago I think, at least in my school. I remember because my kids told me a year or 2 before the oldest graduated (95) one of the boys who was about a year younger then her had to start going to the office to take care of his diabetes, he'd always done the check at his locker and then injected if needed (the other kids never even saw it after awhile, hehe) but something changed in the law and he could not do that anymore. They thought it was pretty stupid and inconvienent for him to have to do that because he'd been doing this by himself for years. But it all of a sudden had to be supervised. I understand the point tho, here I think they have a part time nurse who comes in halfdays and takes care of the paper work and anything else she can get done in the time she's there. Meds are administered by either the nurse if she's there or one of the aides or office staff that have been 'trained' . joy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 9/3/00 12:54:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lowenthalrj@... writes: << Sue's point about the interpreter is a good one, but at the same time, finding a qualified interpreter is getting more difficult and if the interpreter isn't well qualified, then the student isn't really getting their communication needs met. >> Part of the proposed changes in VA SPED regs was over interpreter qualifications. Currently, VA allows lower level interpreters to work for three years, then if they have not passed the test for the higher level, they can no longer continue working for the school system. The lower level rates them at 50% accuracy. Tell me how a child can get an education when only 50% of the information is given to them? At the public comment session concerning the proposed changes to our regulations I attended, we had interpreters requesting the standards be lowered and parents and students requesting the higher standards be adhered to! Cheryl in VA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 09/02/2000 2:12:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time, sbntwong@... writes: << just to throw a little comment in here. It seems to me, (and remember this is only MY opinion!) that things have gone a trifle OTT in the other direction now. What this woman apparantly wanted was someone who could sign to act as intepreter for her son, so, i want one too, I got an unqualified but highly adaptable and willing to learn person. Whats with the qualified teacher of the deaf for what is basically only support work doing being asked to do the job? Seems a very expensive and over the top solution to me when there are (at least in the UK) far too few specialist teachers to go round as it is that to supply one teacher full time to one child is a bit much. And a full time nurse?!!! Why would he need a full time nurse unless his medical problems require full time nursing care in which case a full time nurse who can use sign language would probably save the state a lot of money! Not knocking mums efforts you understand, merely the response to them by the powers that be. >> Hi Susie, I understand what you're saying, but we really don't know all of the facts leading up to this. As far as the signing, it may be more than just interpretation that this child needs. He may need someone who can teach him new signs to help him to communicate better. He may need someone who already needs to know sign to explain things to him that the teacher & other students are saying & to learn his lessons. Then, for the nurse...it is possible that this child needs meds given throughout the day & that he must have a qualified/licensed person to deliver these meds. My daughter ( the NDA ) one, has asthma. While in 2nd grade, she went thru a particularly tough time with her asthma. The only way that she was able to receive her nebulizer treatments was if I came into school to give them to her. There was no nurse at her school & teaching staff is not allowed to administer medications of any kind. It's the law. Besides, who would be teaching the class while a teacher would be administering meds? ( just a thought ). My daughter was fortunate that I was able to do this....I wasn't working. This is not the case for everyone. So, my point is that we don't have all the facts to determine why these decisions/personnel might or might not have been necessary. I think it's easy to jump to many conclusions, when we don't have all the facts. IMHO, Sandy O. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 9/3/00 12:54:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lowenthalrj@... writes: << The original point (I think) was administering a puffer for asthma attacks when they started. The puffer and the knowledge of when and how to use it need to be in the child's classroom, not with a nurse who isn't even there all the time. >> I have heard of children with medical needs that have classrooms locations specified on the IEP, within a certain time frame of the nurse's office, to guarantee that the child would receive the assitance within a time frame that doesn't jeopardize their health in the case of an emergency. With recent legislation, schools CANNOT deny children the medical assistance they need to attend public school. The school should have put a proper plan in place to guarantee that child got the assistance he needed. Saying we don't have someone on hand is just not gonna fly! Cheryl in VA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 09/02/2000 11:34:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, c1ndysue1@... writes: << I can't really express an opinion on the hearing impaired teacher. I would think that a certified interpreter would be sufficient. I thought that was what the mother wanted..someone certified in ESL..not speficially a teacher. >> Maybe these people that they hired ( nurse, sign teacher ) was all that they could come up with on short notice. Not that others wouldn't have been just as capable....but after thinking about this situation more, maybe that is part of the situation. Maybe after looking at everything, not just this one little boy's circumstances...they thought that this was the step to take to do more inclusion for more folks.....since it seems that they weren't really doing it at this particular school....but rather sending the SPED kids out of the area, rather than the home school. So, maybe they are thinking that even more moms will be wanting THEIR kids at their home school & that they should do better to accommodate them. Just a thought, Sandy O. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 09/03/2000 11:30:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time, wildwards@... writes: << Here we have school nurses present in the schools all day, in each and every school. >> So do we. ~Sandy O. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 09/03/2000 12:04:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time, JTesmer799@... writes: << The way I understand from my older kids is they are no longer able to 'self' medicate. >> In our state, they have just changed the law about kids with asthma being able to carry their inhalers & self medicate. Up 'til recently ( this year ), they were not allowed to do this. Due to the fact that some people with asthma can't afford to wait until they can get to the nurse's office ( if physically able ) and find the nurse, and get the meds unlocked & then get their meds......they can get a note from their doctor & their parents & THEN get permission to have their very necessary meds with them to self medicate. This is only available to those children who have been instructed & also " UNDERSTAND " when, why, and how much meds they need. I tend to believe that a 7yo child with DS has the ability to assess his situation & deliver his own meds with full knowledge. JMHO, Sandy O. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 09/02/2000 11:11:42 AM US Mountain Standard Time, sbntwong@... writes: << that things have gone a trifle OTT in the other direction now. >> Our district has a nurse for every couple of schools and each school has a " health aide " who is just a trained lay person to dispense medications. The nurse has one day a week she is at the school, the health aide is there all the time. There are so many children in our school on medications, I don't see that we could be withtout one. If that school had a person like this, they wouldn't have had the problem that they had. I just can't see that they don't have the need for a person for other children besides him. Are there no children on seizure meds or ADD meds at this school? Are there no OTHER children who have asthma? As for the sign language, we had it written in our IEP that the aide hired to work with our son be trained in sign language. If they hire someone who is more than that GREAT.....and hopefully there is someone else in the school who can benefit! I think it is great that this mom opened the doors. Maverick is the only child in our school who is fully included. BUT, in his IEP we require 1. Yearly inclusion training for all who will be working with him(including playground aides and librarians, etc. 2. Possitive behavior management training, and 3 an Inclusion specialist. Now this may seem Over The Top for one student...but what about the others who are going to be coming to our school? What about the teachers who are being educated and going to leave our school and go to another school where there are MORE kids who are fully included? This mom opened the door for alot of us and has now brought to that campus 2 more professionals that if the school was SMART, would be used to benefit others. I applaud her and those who are willing to take that extra step to bring awareness to others so that we don't HAVE to go that far. (Altho I have now vowed that I will not leave home without a jumprope and lawnchair in the car!!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 The original point (I think) was administering a puffer for asthma attacks when they started. The puffer and the knowledge of when and how to use it need to be in the child's classroom, not with a nurse who isn't even there all the time. Sue's point about the interpreter is a good one, but at the same time, finding a qualified interpreter is getting more difficult and if the interpreter isn't well qualified, then the student isn't really getting their communication needs met. Is the mom supposed to be interviewed tonight? Maybe she will clarify these points. Judi Re: Flagpole mom, pt 4/ IT'S ALL OVER In a message dated 9/3/2000 8:30:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time, wildwards@... writes: << I believe the flagpole mom's argument was over the fact that school refused to allow the child to self medicate or provide someone who would administer the medication. The bottom line is, what does the IEP say? Cheryl in VA >> The way I understand from my older kids is they are no longer able to 'self' medicate. (this is why you hear about kids sharing an aspirin with a friend or whatever and getting inot big trouble....part of the unsuccessful war on drugs i think, plus a liability thing) Since about 7 or 8 yrs. ago I think, at least in my school. I remember because my kids told me a year or 2 before the oldest graduated (95) one of the boys who was about a year younger then her had to start going to the office to take care of his diabetes, he'd always done the check at his locker and then injected if needed (the other kids never even saw it after awhile, hehe) but something changed in the law and he could not do that anymore. They thought it was pretty stupid and inconvienent for him to have to do that because he'd been doing this by himself for years. But it all of a sudden had to be supervised. I understand the point tho, here I think they have a part time nurse who comes in halfdays and takes care of the paper work and anything else she can get done in the time she's there. Meds are administered by either the nurse if she's there or one of the aides or office staff that have been 'trained' .. joy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 9/3/00 11:11:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, c1ndysue1@... writes: << My kids have never gone to a school that didn't have a school nurse on site. >> My children also have never gone to a school that the nurse or the nurses aide were not at the school. The grammar school has a nurse all the time. The middle and high school have either the nurse or the aide there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 9/3/00 12:42:06 PM Central Daylight Time, wildwards@... writes: << I have heard of children with medical needs that have classrooms locations specified on the IEP, within a certain time frame of the nurse's office, to guarantee that the child would receive the assitance within a time frame that doesn't jeopardize their health in the case of an emergency. With recent legislation, schools CANNOT deny children the medical assistance they need to attend public school. The school should have put a proper plan in place to guarantee that child got the assistance he needed. Saying we don't have someone on hand is just not gonna fly! Cheryl in VA >> Cheryl, I agree with you about that. Our district is one that only has a nurse in each school part time BUT when we had a medically fragile child at one school they put a nurse there full-time for the first year and then trained the teacher and educational assistant the signs of distress and what action to take. They didn't really have to do anything other than call us immediately and we would take the child directly to their doctor so it wasn't like they were doing medical procedures. Karyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2000 Report Share Posted September 3, 2000 In a message dated 9/3/00 2:12:49 PM Central Daylight Time, Michdock@... writes: << 1. Yearly inclusion training for all who will be working with him(including playground aides and librarians, etc. 2. Possitive behavior management training, and 3 an Inclusion specialist. Now this may seem Over The Top for one student...but what about the others who are going to be coming to our school? What about the teachers who are being educated and going to leave our school and go to another school where there are MORE kids who are fully included? >> , I think of all the reg. ed. kids that this will help. Aren't we hearing about kids feeling left out and isolated and picked on in schools? I also think positive behavioral support is poorly taught in education courses at least in our area. (I have a degree in elem. educ.) So I think it is great that these teachers get this training and I think it helps every student in that school, not just those that are " officially " special needs. Karyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2000 Report Share Posted September 4, 2000 In a message dated 9/3/00 2:06:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Gwhiz@... writes: << Here we have school nurses present in the schools all day, in each and every school. >> So do we. >> I'm also on a school nurse list. Not all schools have their own nurses and this is something that is discussed periodically on that other list. Nurses want to serve the medical needs of the children in their districts and often brainstorm ways to convince their school boards that a fulltime nurse in every school is needed. But money being tight in many districts the school nurse along with music and art teachers are often the first to go when the budget axe is wielded. Even in states which require an RN or LPN only to administer meds may not have one or the other in each school. Another concern that is frequently discussed is their desire to be present at IEP meetings of children with multiple medical needs. Even though I'm a nurse and a mother of a child with multiple medical problems it never occured to me that I could really use this ally at meetings. Since this is a transitional year for Sheila I called the nurse in the middle/high school an d talked with her about Sheila's many medical needs and concerns--I then invited her to the meeting. If you do live in a district where there is a part or fulltime nurse and your child has some medical concerns consider trying to get to know this person. You may discover that you have a district person who will go to bat for your child even in educational areas. A child in poor health is often too distracted to learn--the nurse will want to help reduce the distractions. She can be an invaluable resource for you. LOL, okay, climbing off my soapbox ;-) nancy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2000 Report Share Posted September 4, 2000 In a message dated 9/4/00 6:54:57 AM Central Daylight Time, NEHolroyd@... writes: << Even though I'm a nurse and a mother of a child with multiple medical problems it never occured to me that I could really use this ally at meetings. Since this is a transitional year for Sheila I called the nurse in the middle/high school an d talked with her about Sheila's many medical needs and concerns--I then invited her to the meeting. If you do live in a district where there is a part or fulltime nurse and your child has some medical concerns consider trying to get to know this person. You may discover that you have a district person who will go to bat for your child even in educational areas. A child in poor health is often too distracted to learn--the nurse will want to help reduce the distractions. She can be an invaluable resource for you. LOL, okay, climbing off my soapbox ;-) nancy >> , Our part-time school nurse was the nurse at the special needs school before it was closed so I am very comfortable with her knowledge of disabilities. I always update her on medication or medical issues with my foster son and have used her to check his ears every other week to screen for ear infections. It was very helpful in determining that he had almost constant fluid issues. Much better than running needlessly to the dr.s office. You are right a good school nurse can be a wonderful ally. One school nurse went to bat for us on toilet access issues. Karyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2000 Report Share Posted September 4, 2000 In a message dated 09/04/2000 6:09:41 PM US Mountain Standard Time, Bonoratoe001@... writes: << After all this woman has been through and what she was willing to do for her son, she deserves anything she can get for him. >> I think the key phrase here is " Anything she can get FOR HIM! " . What she is doing she is doing for the betterment and health of her son. Not for selfish reasons, not for cosmetic reasons, but for health, communication and educational reasons. How many of you would say NO if that were offered to your child? How many of you feel that your child would benefit from these services? How many of you would be grateful if your child got these services? If your child DOES get your services, it is becuase someone was willing to fight and educate the system before you came along. Let's support these Moms! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2000 Report Share Posted September 4, 2000 I must respectfully disagree with all of you. After all this woman has been through and what she was willing to do for her son, she deserves anything she can get for him. Sign language interpreters are rare. They are hard to come by. There are few schools that offer the program and fewer still are the graduates who pass them. Here in Hawaii, 18 passed out of a class of over 100. They are paid well, probably better than the teacher with better credentials. They start here at $25 an hour. I think also the judge is trying to make a point. The district could have saved money by doing it right the first time and not sending the mom to these extremes. Now they have to do it the judges way. Elaine Mom to (now 17) and 14 (DS) Re: Flagpole mom, pt 4/ IT'S ALL OVER > > In a message dated 9/2/2000 11:34:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > c1ndysue1@... writes: > I see your point. I don't think a nurse is needed on site full time, a > clinic aide who is well trained would be sufficient in my book. SNIP > I can't really express an opinion on the hearing impaired teacher. I > would think that a certified interpreter would be sufficient. > ~~~~~~~~~~~ > I agree with both and Sue. Lets don't forget the mtg has not happened > yet, so they may at that time decide on a clinic aide/sign language aide. > Rejoice! > Amie > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2000 Report Share Posted September 4, 2000 Everywhere we have been stationed, the schools have school nurses. The only places that didn't were the very rural districts in Missouri. That is pretty much the rule now. It is great coverage against lawsuit to have medical personnel on hand. They give medications (when there is a prescription). The also do catheterizations for kids who need them and check all the typical kids who get hurt or become ill. Elaine Re: Flagpole mom, pt 4/ IT'S ALL OVER > > Hi, > My kids have never gone to a school that didn't have a school nurse on > site. And I always thought that having a nurse at each school (or sometimes > shared by two schools) was the rule rather than the exception. > I'm sure this woman's son is not the only child who needs nursing contact > time each day. For instance, in Washington, any child who needs medication > administered during the school day goes to the nurse to get it. > What with Ramona's medical needs, attendance at school would have been > very difficult without a nurse handy. We grew to rely on this wonderful > lady! But, she was not there just for my daughter...she was part of the > staff in the first place. > Take care, > > mom to Ramona 16ds, and two big sisters on their own > > c1ndysue1@... wrote: > << I see your point. I don't think a nurse is needed on site full time, a > clinic aide who is well trained would be sufficient in my book. In cases of > a true emergency, I'd prefer a paramedic over a nurse anyday. I would want > someone who can get orders from an ER doctor and be able to administer > whatever drugs or life saving techniques needed. I don't think this is a > rural school, so one would tend to believe that a rescue squad is nearby. > >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.