Historical article (was Re: Horrifying article)

[Guest guest]

Loriann,

As a former moderator, I'm fully aware of the site guidelines. Since

you're addressing this to me, I need to ask what was said that didn't

follow those guidelines?

> >

> > luv2icesk8lots,

> >

> > There is simply nothing " wrong " with it. If the purpose of the

web

> > page is simply to tell what a Harrington rod is, the page does

that

> > quite well. Its not up to any of us to say how much information

> > (beyond what is currently there) should be included. Nutty did a

> > good job of doing what she intended. Anything more is

nitpicking.

> > The page is not there to tell of the evils of Harrington rods, to

> > lecture on the differences between rod technologies, nor to

correct

> > the incorrect usage of the term " Harrington rod. "

> >

> >

>