Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: My Latest PCR

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

-Hi Margot, congratulations on your continued great test results. I

hope I can do as well as you are.

Shari from Kansas

-- In , " Margot M " <redbudln@c...> wrote:

> Hi:

> Just thought I'd report that I just got my latest PCR results back

> from MDACC. When I found out that the results just were for a qRT

> PCR with a sensitivity of 100,000 cells, I was taken aback because

> they had always done nested if the quantitative PCR was negative.

> So I quickly e-mailed Dr. Koller to ask if nested had been done and

> asked if possibly the nested wasn't completed yet. Here is the

> answer I got back:

>

> " The lab has found that with improvements in realtime PCR that the

> nested PCR will not add sensitivity unless there is a problem with

> amplifying abl, which in your case there was not. Also, there was

> no discrepancy with the genescan. They will stick by their results

> with a sensitivity of 1:100000.

> Your reward for such an excellent test: stay on your Gleevec. "

>

> Of course, I am very happy with these results--who wouldn't be.

> But I still I could use some explanation of exactly

what " amplification "

> means in this case as I always thought that the amplification

> happens with the nested PCR, also what " genescan " stands for.

> Anyone up to this explanation?

>

> Margot

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Margot, I got the same results on my last QPCR. Do you know if this mean we are

at molecular remission or PCRU? My next appt at Moffit Center will be July 13 .

I will ask my Doctor what does it mean.

T

dxd 1/3

CCR 7/03

-- In , " Margot M " <redbudln@c...> wrote:

> Hi:

> Just thought I'd report that I just got my latest PCR results back

> from MDACC. When I found out that the results just were for a qRT

> PCR with a sensitivity of 100,000 cells, I was taken aback because

> they had always done nested if the quantitative PCR was negative.

> So I quickly e-mailed Dr. Koller to ask if nested had been done and

> asked if possibly the nested wasn't completed yet. Here is the

> answer I got back:

>

> " The lab has found that with improvements in realtime PCR that the

> nested PCR will not add sensitivity unless there is a problem with

> amplifying abl, which in your case there was not. Also, there was

> no discrepancy with the genescan. They will stick by their results

> with a sensitivity of 1:100000.

> Your reward for such an excellent test: stay on your Gleevec. "

>

> Of course, I am very happy with these results--who wouldn't be.

> But I still I could use some explanation of exactly

what " amplification "

> means in this case as I always thought that the amplification

> happens with the nested PCR, also what " genescan " stands for.

> Anyone up to this explanation?

>

> Margot

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...