Guest guest Posted March 16, 2005 Report Share Posted March 16, 2005 > > I just imported the latest version (as of 4/03 - hardly current!) of the CML > Glossary. I couldn't bring myself to import the one called " CMLinfo.doc " > though, because the advice in it mostly pertains to newly diagnosed CML > patients the pre-IM era. Our concerns then were pretty different from now, and I > suppose for that reason it's of historical interest. I don't know, what do others > think - worth bringing over anyway? > > R Hey Doc.... I think it is worth bringing it over with the reason you mention above attached to it. My 2 cents, dt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2005 Report Share Posted March 16, 2005 Hi , I agree with Dane. The historical interest is reason enough to import the file and it gives us a way to see how much CML treatment has progressed. I had a class motto that said " Live in the present, guided by the past, for the future " and I know in my case it works. Thank you for your help in building this new group. Take care, M > > I just imported the latest version (as of 4/03 - hardly current!) of the CML > Glossary. I couldn't bring myself to import the one called " CMLinfo.doc " > though, because the advice in it mostly pertains to newly diagnosed CML > patients the pre-IM era. Our concerns then were pretty different from now, and I > suppose for that reason it's of historical interest. I don't know, what do others > think - worth bringing over anyway? > > R Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Hi Dane, OK, I'll forward that old file for what it's worth. I'm happy you're here, and happy you continue to do so well. It must feel like being born into a new world. Warmly, R > Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:08:22 -0000 > From: dane714@... > Subject: Re: File transfer > > > >> >> I just imported the latest version (as of 4/03 - hardly current!) of the CML >> Glossary. I couldn't bring myself to import the one called " CMLinfo.doc " >> though, because the advice in it mostly pertains to newly diagnosed CML >> patients the pre-IM era. Our concerns then were pretty different from now, >> and I suppose for that reason it's of historical interest. I don't know, what >> do others think - worth bringing over anyway? >> >> R > > Hey Doc.... > > I think it is worth bringing it over with the reason you mention > above attached to it. > > My 2 cents, dt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 It does, ....strange to think that in a few months, I will have to have all the innoculations we all have as an infant all over again! I hav'nt asked my team yet, but what about childhood illnesses like, mumps, measles and chicken pox? I suppose I am subject to those again as well. > Hi Dane, > > OK, I'll forward that old file for what it's worth. > > I'm happy you're here, and happy you continue to do so well. It must feel > like being born into a new world. > > Warmly, > R > > > Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:08:22 -0000 > > From: dane714@c... > > Subject: Re: File transfer > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.