Follow-up to previous crabby post

[Guest guest]

Peri, I just read your post again. I guess I was a bit hasty in

reacting.

The alternative approach you suggest is perfectly viable -- selective

culling, culminating in a montage of viewpoints. I am not sure that is

what Dr. Oz's people are looking for, though, and we are lacking in the

" man " power to pull off something like that.

Certainly the program has the wherewithal to find a medical authority

once they decide to go with a given topic. They can't expect each email

they receive to come with an appended or sponsoring medical authority.

And I rather imagine they are looking for the " real thing " -- something

like the cumulative impact of as many letters from as many " real people "

as we can get out to them -- in preference to a professionally crafted

montage.

I may be wrong. I sometimes am.

'Nuff said.