Guest guest Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 I think it comes down to reading abstracts, deciding for yourself if it was a good study or not, and drawing your own conclusions. If you have a scientific background, it's a little easier to be an intelligent consumer of information because you'll have an understanding of how good research is done. Remember the cold fusion fiasco 10+ years ago? Scientists are human too, and they are prone to jumping to conclusions as well, particularly when it's a huge discovery or leap forward for their field. It's always good to question the results of a study, especially because in the case of Samter's, there are a wide range of symptoms and treatments that work. Thanks for posting that article! As you said, we all know our doctors don't know everything, but it's nice to have some hard evidence of that. Becca > > Are the studies right or wrong? > Do " experts " know what they are talking about? > > Check out: > http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1998644,00.html > > No surprises for most of this group. There are more stories here about > ignorance of MDs, (sometimes dangerous), with respect to Samters, than > there about any unseful advice from them. > > > btw, for those who are too young to remember Oat Bran . . . > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oat > > http://www.improvingmedicalstatistics.com/oatbran%20intro%20details.htm > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.