Guest guest Posted November 16, 2001 Report Share Posted November 16, 2001 Dear colleagues, When people think or talk about an epidemic, there is something visible and striking. A large number of people suddenly getting hospitalised with typhoid fever, or a number of people developing cholera with some deaths or a dramatic increase in dengue hemorrhagic fever or Japanese encephalitis. HIV infection is silent, no matter how many get infected. So it is misleading to use the same word epidemic for HIV infection because people will soon believe that it was a false alarm. Even AIDS (I prefer to call the illness HIV disease rather than AIDS) is not an epidemic in the usual sense as it has no sudden increase and a decline in real time -- as in all other epidemics. Technically the term epidemic is accurate, but the peak may be reached in decades rather than in weeks or months as in acute disease epidemics, nor will the decline be rapid and visible as in common epidemics in which the susceptibles are exhausted within a short period, weeks or months. " Explosive outbreak or epidemic " is totally inappropriate since the epidemic is slowly progressing and not explosive. Unless we have good disease surveillance system and HIV disease gets reported, all estimates of infection burden or illness prevalence will remain mere estimates with no accuracy. Most Asian countries do not have such a system, but Thailand has a reasonable one and Singapore has a good one. But I do not know if HIV diseases is on the reporting list. The Indian system of " surveillance " (again misnomer, just surveys) or the current " sentinel surveillance " (again mere sentinel surveys) cannot give any incidence or prevalence figures with a reasonable degree of confidence. When Tuberculosis appeared in the old world, apparently a similar phenomenon occurred and it took some several hundred years for its epidemiology to settle into an endemic pattern that we see today. In the beginning the disease was more severe and with very high mortality rates. The same is the likely trajectory of HIV/HIV disease. Still, some understanding of the magnitude is necessary in every country. In India the official figures put the total number infected at about 4 million. The error may be so huge that it may range to above 10 million, but how can any one prove it? T . E-mail: <tjjohn@...> _______________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2001 Report Share Posted November 18, 2001 I think the best way to gather data on incidence and prevalence rates of HIV disease (as opposed to AIDS) is dependent on many factors. Stigma and discrimination are horrible in India from all the reports I get. So maintaining confidentiality and anonymity are critical. How can that be achieved and still get good epi data? The best solution--which may be technically challenging in some aspects--is a unique identifier system. If such a system can be put in place and run effectively in India, it could be a great stride forward for all nations facing the HIV pandemic. What are other thoughts on the feasibility of such an approach? M. E-mail: <gmc0@...> ___________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2001 Report Share Posted November 20, 2001 Dear , The HIV drama is at the individual and family level. And our health care system is not geared to provide support at such levels. If the response of the government will change according to the prevalence rate or the numbers of people already infected, there is merit in trying to get reasonably believable figures. That is not the case in India. Numbers are just played as arguments at various occasions. If a nation does not know how to control dysentery and typhoid fever, how can you expect such a nation to respond adequately to HIV and HIV diseas? So, I am now devoting my time to build the foundations of Public Health that we failed to lay. Kerala State will be the field. In less than five years we will have a model replicable in each State in India. Not yet for HIV but for communicable diseases in general, as foundation for facing any health issue at community level. E-mail: <tjjohn@...> _________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.