Guest guest Posted September 21, 1998 Report Share Posted September 21, 1998 ACIP Wants Routine Use Of Rotavirus Vaccine. Miriam E. Tucker, Senior Writer Pediatric News 32(8):22, 1998. © 1998 International Medical News Group ATLANTA -- The Soon-To-Be-Licensed Rotavirus Vaccine Should Be Given Routinely To Infants, The Advisory Committee On Immunization Practices Of The Centers For Disease Control And Prevention Has Voted. At Its Recent Meeting, Members Of ACIP Concluded That Routine Immunization Of Term Infants At 2, 4, And 6 Months Of Age Would Be The Best Way To Prevent A Large Proportion Of Severe Rotavirus-Associated Diarrhea And Its Sequelae. Some Committee Members Also Felt That Such A Recommendation Would Help Ensure Third-Party Coverage Of The Live, Oral, Tetravalent, Rhesus-Based Vaccine, Which Will Be Marketed As RotaShield By Wyeth-Lederle Vaccines And Pediatrics. Prior To Voting For The Current Statement, ACIP Decided Against Issuing A Permissive Statement That Would Make The Vaccine Optional, Or A Recommendation To Vaccinate Only High-Risk Groups. Those Options Were Favored By An Advisory Commission Of The American Academy Of Family Physicians. The American Academy Of Pediatrics' Committee On Infectious Diseases Is Currently Working On A Rotavirus Vaccine Statement, Committee hair Dr. Neal A. Halsey Told PEDIATRIC NEWS. The ACIP Draft Statement Points Out That Rotavirus Is Responsible For 5%-15% Of All Diarrheal Episodes Among Children Under 5 Years Of Age In The United States And For A Higher Proportion Of Severe Diarrheal Episodes. Although Rotavirus Infection Causes Only About 20 Deaths Per Year In The United States, It Accounts For More Than 500,000 Physician Visits And About 50,000 Hospitalizations Each Year Among Children Under Age 5. Rotavirus Infection Results In $264 Million In Direct Medical Costs And More Than $1 Billion In Total Costs To Society Each Year In The United States, According To The ACIP Document. The Rotavirus Vaccine Is Safe And Effective When Administered Along With Other Routine Vaccines. It Can Be Given To Children Who Are Being Breast-Fed And To Those With Mild, Transient Illnesses Or Low-Grade Fever, ACIP Concluded. Contraindications To The Use Of The Vaccine In Children Include Known Or Suspected Immunodeficiency, Acute Moderate To Severe Febrile Illness, An Evolving Neurologic Condition, Or Persistent Vomiting. Due To Lack Of Data, The Statement Urges That The Rotavirus Vaccine Be Used With Caution In Infants Who Were Born Prematurely (At Less Than 37 Weeks' Gestation), Who Have Ongoing Diarrhea Or Preexisting Chronic GI Disease, Or Who Live In Households With An Immunocompromised Person. The Vaccine Should Not Be Readministered To An Infant Who Spits Out The Vaccine Or Regurgitates Or Vomits After Receiving It. The First Dose Of Rotavirus Vaccine Should Not Be Given Beyond 6 Months Of Age Because The Risk Of Fever May Be Higher Than That In Younger Infants. Second And Third Doses Can Be Given At Any Time During The First Year Of Life As Long As The Doses Are Separated By Intervals Of At Least 3 Weeks. In Clinical Trials, The Vaccine Was 49%-68% Effective Against Any Rotavirus Diarrhea And Was 69%-91% Effective Against Severe Diarrhea, The Statement Noted. Fever Occurring Within 3-5 Days Of Administration Is The Most Significant Adverse Effect Seen With The Rotavirus Vaccine. Family Doctors May Oppose Routine Use. The American Academy Of Family Physicians May Not Go Along With ACIP'S Recommendation For Routine Use Of The Rotavirus Vaccine. Representing The AAFP'S Commission On Clinical Policies And Research, Dr. Theodore G. Ganiats Told ACIP That The Commission Feels The Rotavirus Vaccine Should Not Be Recommended For Routine Use At This Time. After Making A Final Decision Once The Vaccine Is Licensed, The Commission Will Issue A Recommendation To The AAFP Board Of Directors. Dr. Ganiats, Director Of The Health Outcomes Assessment Program At The University Of California, San Diego, Said The Commission Is Concerned That A Mandate For The Vaccine Would Unnecessarily Override Patient Preference By Promoting Use Of A Vaccine That Does Not Produce Herd Immunity And For Which The Cost Is Not Yet Known. The Commission Is Also Concerned About Possible Diminished Compliance With Other Vaccines And About Giving Economic Leverage To The Manufacturer Before The Vaccine'S Price Is Known. " We See Little Reason To Rush To Recommend This Vaccine Universally, Except Maybe For High-Risk Groups, " Dr. Ganiats Said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.