Guest guest Posted November 22, 1999 Report Share Posted November 22, 1999 In a message dated 99-11-22 13:15:32 EST, you write: << T LEAST 10 times daily, ongoing, not intermittently. In my case and anyone I have asked, this just doesn't happen. >> Hmm. It does in my home. My ds is 18 months old and nurses 20 or more times in a 24 hour period. >> hmmm yep in my home too...my eight month old nurses constantly...and so did my 18 year old...for quite some time (*grin* not eighteen years though!). Anjin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 1999 Report Share Posted November 22, 1999 > << YES!!! I have two nieces.... ten months apart...ask their mother...she was > exclusively breastfeeding...her first was just an infant. > Anjin >> > > This is almost impossible if a women is exclusively breastfeeding. There > must have been some separation going on. The odds of conception in the first > three months post-partum in an exclusively woman are almost nil. From three > to six months the odds are less than 1 %. This also assumes a lack of a > menstrual period. In an exclusively breastfeeding woman menstruation never > occurs prior to 56 days and this is the exception for it to happen this > early. Kimme I think the point is that it DOES happen. I have three friends who all have children that are 12 or less months apart. NO separation on breastfeeding. There simply must be other factors to consider as this just does not hold water to say otherwise. Statistics might say this is not the norm but you would never convince these women of that. Don't get me wrong, I know many women who have not had a period return until after 12 months. But I also know of many who have had a return of menses 3-4 months post partum and have gotten pregnant during that time. It is definitely not " almost impossible " . Maybe more rare for you to hear of it than someone else but that does not mean that it doesn't happen to a lot of people. Toni, mom to home birthed, cloth diapered, breastfed and attachment parented Hannah http://home.clarksville.com/~dth > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 1999 Report Share Posted November 22, 1999 > < AT LEAST > 10 times daily, ongoing, not intermittently. In my case and anyone I have > asked, this just doesn't happen. >> > Hmm. It does in my home. My ds is 18 months old and nurses 20 or more times > in a 24 hour period. The only time my daughter ever comes close to nursing that many times in a day is if she is teething. Otherwise, she is just to busy with life and I couldn't get her to nurse that often no matter how much I might try. She is 14 months old and eats solid food now so 20 times in a day would just be ridiculous for her. Although, I would let her if she wished. Every baby is different. Some nurse a bunch, some less frequently. This is why I do not think it is wise for everyone to rely on breastfeeding alone as their sole method of birth control. Toni, mom to home birthed, cloth diapered, breastfed and attachment parented Hannah http://home.clarksville.com/~dth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 1999 Report Share Posted December 1, 1999 In a message dated 11/22/99 12:11:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, Squeaksoup@... writes: > In a message dated 11/22/99 06:30:48 AM, Anjin327@... writes: > > << YES!!! I have two nieces.... ten months apart...ask their mother...she > was > exclusively breastfeeding...her first was just an infant. > Anjin >> > > This is almost impossible if a women is exclusively breastfeeding. There > must have been some separation going on. The odds of conception in the > first > three months post-partum in an exclusively woman are almost nil. From three > > to six months the odds are less than 1 %. This also assumes a lack of a > menstrual period. In an exclusively breastfeeding woman menstruation never > occurs prior to 56 days and this is the exception for it to happen this > early. Kimme > What about the fact that you not even supposed to have sex for at least 6 weeks after giving birth? Cory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 1999 Report Share Posted December 1, 1999 In a message dated 12/1/1999 9:24:59 PM Central Standard Time, Cmermer@... writes: << What about the fact that you not even supposed to have sex for at least 6 weeks after giving birth? >> Huh? I think (if I remember correctly) this is related to the episiodomy... the stitches usually come out, or it is at least checked at your 6-week check-up. Other than that, those of us who were not exhausted and didn't have epis. didn't have any *time* limit put on us -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 1999 Report Share Posted December 1, 1999 In a message dated 99-12-01 22:24:56 EST, you write: << What about the fact that you not even supposed to have sex for at least 6 weeks after giving birth? Cory >> Well.....some people do not follow these recocmendations! I didn't for one! My husband left for Japan for three months when my baby was less than 6 weeks old. I had a very easy birth and my bleeding had stopped...my midwife had checked me and gave me the ok...so I was doing the " wild thing " long before six weeks was done. ..otherwise I was going to have a loooong wait *grin*...if I had gotten pregnant I would have children 10 months apart. Just like vaccinations... " reccomendations " don't always fit with " real life " ...I am forty years old...lost weight in my pregnancy(I never lost the fifty pounds my 18 year old gave me) and ate TONS of good food but still had a 8 lb 4 oz healthy baby. I had a four hour labor with NO damage...I worked the day before I gave birth and three days after the birth (with my baby right beside me)...I could have worked the DAY I gave birth...I felt that good. Reccomendations say vaccinate your baby...I don't ...my husband nearly died from vaccines and my oldest had reactions...I don't follow the reccomendations...I follow what my " gut " and research and common sense tell me to do. Anjin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 1999 Report Share Posted December 2, 1999 In a message dated 12/1/99 11:17:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, C8743@... writes: > < What about the fact that you not even supposed to have sex for at least 6 > weeks after giving birth? >> > > Huh? I think (if I remember correctly) this is related to the episiodomy... > > the stitches usually come out, or it is at least checked at your 6-week > check-up. Other than that, those of us who were not exhausted and didn't > have epis. didn't have any *time* limit put on us -- I had a c-section and had the 6 week time limit set by my doctor. Chelly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.