Guest guest Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 > > Sorry cannot remember who it was who mentioned a couple of weeks ago a BMJ article about the inadequacy of thyroid tests. > I was emailing my GP about something else and sent him the link to this. > This particular GP has been making my life a misery for years now, insisting that I am hypothyroid when I am not because of my suppressed TSH and refusing to test my FT3 even though i was, until recently, on T3 only meds. > So much to my surprise I received a letter this morning from him saying - > " Thank you for bringing to my attention the BMJ article on the usefulness (or otherwise) of thyroid function tests. This certainly puts the case for less reliance on testing, and more reliance on symptomatology. " > > Well blow me over with a fevver LOL! > > My endo appt looms and my concern now is my suppressed TSH. The new info in the Files is good because it gives new guidelines for just how suppressed a TSH can be before complications can be expected. > BUT my TSH is always more suppressed than the numbers indicated therein so where does that leave me when my upcoming tests show a TSH of .001 or whatever? > > I have aded in 100 mcg T4 to my T3 dose and, as posted, there was no sign of the expected hyper symptoms at all. even at 28 days. So the penny dropped that what was probably happening was that I was showing the hypo-type hyper signs and I reduced my T3 by 1 3/4 25 mcg tabs (sorry disculia!)and lo and behold up came my energy and the afternoon sleeps went west. > > So so far, so good. Just how do I get the endo off my back when she inevitably insists on going all T4? > Thanks. And huge thanks to whoever it was you brought the BMJ article to the list! > > Mo > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.