Guest guest Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 The recent posts on parents concerned about possible endocrine/thyroid problems and their impact on child development and linked educational difficulties are not, I believe, insignificant. At some point in time, I think that there MAY be some mileage in getting together some stats or doing a poll on parental experiences in this context.....it might give added weight to the need for endocrinologists to take such matters seriously in young adults who themselves will go on to be parents. Genetic links are important here. The medical profession need strong incentives to address such issues. I have for years been concerned about treatment of fertility related issues in ways that do not seek to address underlying factors (with regard to endocrine related problems) which may affect quality of development of the foetus in utero. Increasing medical success has increased survival rates with regard to infant mortality, but it has not yet succeeded in matching these statistical " successes " with ensuring quality of life measure that ensure the resulting children have equally good chances within our educational system and subsequent lives. The government gives them no " brownie " points for so doing (!) Most people will be unaware that in years gone by dyslexia and related conditions were a medical responsibility in financial terms (linked also to appropriate educational provision, in much the same way as speech therapy and occupational therapy). I think it was in around the late 1970's early 1980's that funding for education for those with dyslexia/dyspraxia etc was transferred to education rather than health departments. The effect of such changes in funding provision was to lessen the incentive for those involved in healthcare to prioritise prevention of such difficulties. This funding element may appear to be a side issue. However, it is clear that schools have been creaking at the seams in their attempts to make appropriate educational provision for children with such difficulties....particularly given the sheer number of those affected. These issues therefore go much further than might at first appear. Yes, it is obvious that we do not have sufficient high quality endocrinologists to meet existing needs, there being a particular shortage of those able to understand and disentangle pituitary and thyroid related issues. The health care system is also creaking at the seams and no doubt in time will reconsider whether or not there may need to be a radical overhaul of not only provision of appropriate NUMBERS of suitable endocrinologists - but also, I hope, may consider whether or not departmental structures within health care adequately allow for appropriate referrals. At the current time, as far as my limited experience allows,it seems that people needing referrals tend to be channelled towards thyroid/diabetes specialists or towards fertility specialists. Many patients actually have symptoms and difficulties which may involve a combination of factors, ranging from any/all of the above but also including emotional factors - there being well recognised links also with depression, bi-polar and other difficulties for which input may also be sought from the psychiatric profession. What we do NOT have, are departments and professionals who are trained in sufficient depth to be able to offer comprehensive and integrative help for patients whose real life difficulties cross over departmental domains. Appropriate " channeling " at the current time creates enormous difficulties for doctors and patients alike, primarily because of the inappropriate departmental structures and divisions that exist within the STRUCTURE of NHS provision. Patients who need integrated care get compartmentalised into " boxes " that reflect NHS structures rather than being given integrated health care that allows recognition of genuinely interrelated problems affecting every sphere of life. I am not volunteering for a role in taking action on this one as I know I have to focus on resolving my own difficulties at this time. Until I get much further along the path with regard to my own health I am not realistically in a position to give consistent input in any domain. But I mention it because I feel I have to! I apologise in advance for raising another " headache " in considering appropriate standpoints in campaigning strategies. Because the problem is potentially an issue that affects health, education, employment and productivity - and hence the eventual financial strength of the UK, there may be arguments for the issue being confronted on a wider political base than simply within the health care system. Vicky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.