Guest guest Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 This is a spinoff of the discussion currently taking place under the 'Estrogen and Iodine' subject line - a piece of that from MacGilchrist is pasted below for reference. I thought that this paragraph from the Optimox website might be relevant to the discussion if it continues ... " In patients with a normal gastrointestinal absorption of iodine but with a very defective iodine retention system, the absorbed iodine is quantitatively excreted in the urine with little or no retention. In these rare cases, the loading test will suggest whole body iodine sufficiency (90% or more excreted) but the serum inorganic iodide levels 24 hrs after the iodine load will remain low (less than 0.13 mg/L). The inefficient iodine retention mechanism could be due to either a defective cellular iodine transport system, or due to blockage of this iodine cellular transport by goitrogens that compete with iodide for the halide binding site of the symporter system. The defective iodine cellular transport mechanism could be due to genetic defects or oxidative damage to the halide binding site of the symporter (6). " Source: http://www.optimox.com/pics/Iodine/IOD-11/IOD_11.htm Dear Joan, Two points in your post caught my attention and perhaps could do with some discussion. 1) The guy peeing out more iodine than he ingested. Well, where did he get his test done? Getting a run of the mill iodine in urine test can give wildly inaccurate results. When the iodine doctors started using the iodine loading test, they sent each sample to two laboratories. No two sample pairs had the same result and sometimes the results from one lab were twice the amount in the other for the same sample, if I remember rightly. Anyhow, wild discrepancies in these samples. According to the literature that I have read on the www.optimox.com site this is probably caused by two things. (i) Most labs have machines calibrated for µg and not mg measurements of iodine. (ii) There is a problem with the electrodes used when doing regular testing for iodine. I believe that high levels of bromide, which is very close to iodine on the periodic table, can affect the reading for iodine. I believe that Dr Flechas or someone uses a filtering technique on each urine sample to remove bromide so that it does not affect the iodine measurement. If anyone is interested in reading up on this there has been a paper published on the optimox site which explains it all much better than I can. The iodine loading test takes the " bromide factor " into account. Which is why it is done in only two labs who are specially equipped for it. This might explain someone who is peeing out more iodine than he ingests. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.