Re: S.510

[Guest guest]

What a roller coaster! This is great news. Anyone with Senators who voted

against the bill, you might contact your senators and ask them to oppose

the unanimous consent agreement in the Senate to strike that

revenue-raising provision from the bill, because additional voices against

the rewrite would end any hope they had of moving it that way.

Wow, what an odd " save the day " sort of mistake that was to include

fundraising in a Senate-originated bill. That is pretty basic to how things

work in Congress. oh well, for whatever reasons, the natural health

community may have been given a reprieve, and for that I am very grateful.

Thanks again to everyone who called your senators.

--

At 07:27 PM 12/1/2010, you wrote:

> According to The Alliance for Natural Health:

>

>The Senate’s controversial FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (S. 510) now

>appears to be dead in the water!

>

><http://aahf.convio.net/site/R?i=gX1DULeNfGphk1I0vvNDGA..>As we reported

>to you yesterday, the Senate passed its version of the Food Safety bill by

>a margin of 73 to 25, and sent it on to the House of Representatives for

>approval. Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA) had

><http://aahf.convio.net/site/R?i=vU9v9utp_NzNz-7WmC5-ZQ..>previously

>agreed to accept the Senate’s bill in place of the House’s version,

>already approved, so this approval was expected to be pro-forma.

>

>But it turns out that Section 107 of the Senate bill contains a

>revenue-raising (i.e., taxing) provision. And such a provision is

>unconstitutional: “All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the

>House of Representatives,” according to Article I, Section 7, of the

>Constitution. Because the Senate violated the funding origination clause,

>the House has implemented a procedure known as “blue slipping” to block

>the bill, keeping it out of consideration and sending it back to the Senate.

>

>The only possible “quick fix” would be a unanimous consent agreement in

>the Senate to strike that revenue-raising provision from the bill­but Sen.

>Tom Coburn (R-OK) has already stated that he will oppose, so unanimity

>will be impossible. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is now faced with

>some tough choices: spend a huge amount of time all over again to deal

>with this (which is unlikely in a Lame Duck Congress, especially

>considering how controversial the bill is); or do nothing, and allow the

>bill to die at the end of this Congress. This will mean a new Food Safety

>Bill will be introduced next year­but next year’s Congress will be very

>different from the current one, so we expect that the bil

~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~

--A.J. Muste

[Guest guest]

I hope you are right...but the constitution doesn't seemed to have stopped this Congress from doing exactly as they please!

BarbF

In a message dated 12/1/2010 8:27:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, drlanphier@... writes:

According to The Alliance for Natural Health:

The Senate’s controversial FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (S. 510) now appears to be dead in the water!

As we reported to you yesterday, the Senate passed its version of the Food Safety bill by a margin of 73 to 25, and sent it on to the House of Representatives for approval. Congressm an Henry Waxman (D-CA) had previously agreed to accept the Senate’s bill in place of the House’s version, already approved, so this approval was expected to be pro-forma.

But it turns out that Section 107 of the Senate bill contains a revenue-raising (i.e., taxing) provision. And such a provision is unconstitutional: “All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives,†according to Article I, Section 7, of the Constitution. Because the Senate violated the funding origination clause, the House has implemented a procedure known as “blue slipping†to block the bill, keeping it out of consideration and sending it back to the Senate.< /p> The only possible “quick fix†would be a unanimous consent agreement in the Senate to strike that revenue-raising provision from the bill—but Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) has already stated that he will oppose, so unanimity will be impossible. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is now faced with some tough choices: spend a huge amount of time all over again to deal with this (which is unlikely in a Lame Duck Congress, especially considering how controversial the bill is); or do nothing, and allow the bill to die at the end of this Congress. This will mean a new Food Safety Bill will be introduced next year—but next year’s Congress will be very different from the current one, so we expect that the bill will look very different, and could be much more favorable to the natural health community.

As always, we will keep you posted on any new developments.

Sincerely,The Alliance for Natural Health USA