Guest guest Posted February 4, 2011 Report Share Posted February 4, 2011 So typical. Now it's starting to come out that the levels of fluoride in municipal water are " unsafe " . But there is a cost if they don't put it in: Fertilizer companies would have to dispose of it as hazardous waste rather than selling it to cities. Please excuse my cynicism. > > Saw last nite; > " Epa is going to examine establishing 'safe' levels of perchlorate (a chemical used in rocket fuel)in drinking water. This is a chemical known to cause Thyroid damage, especially in children and pregnant women, and has been confirmed to be in over 150 samples tested. " > > Don't waste your energy, standing up to cheer. They then cut to footage of an EPA representative, speaking to congress; She was making it clear that they are going to do a thurough cost/benefit analysis, weighing the costs of removing perchlorate from the water supplies vs. the 'costs' of,....well,..not. > Said the EPA will take at least 2 years to come up with reccomendations.OH, well,.. our Government at work.! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2011 Report Share Posted February 4, 2011 Actually fluoride is a by product of the aluminum industry. Let's move this discussion to the IodineOTGroup. Thank you. Kathleen Re: In the News; EPA to examine Perchlorate So typical. Now it's starting to come out that the levels of fluoride in municipal water are "unsafe". But there is a cost if they don't put it in: Fertilizer companies would have to dispose of it as hazardous waste rather than selling it to cities.Please excuse my cynicism.>> Saw last nite;> "Epa is going to examine establishing 'safe' levels of perchlorate (a chemical used in rocket fuel)in drinking water. This is a chemical known to cause Thyroid damage, especially in children and pregnant women, and has been confirmed to be in over 150 samples tested."> > Don't waste your energy, standing up to cheer. They then cut to footage of an EPA representative, speaking to congress; She was making it clear that they are going to do a thurough cost/benefit analysis, weighing the costs of removing perchlorate from the water supplies vs. the 'costs' of,....well,..not.> Said the EPA will take at least 2 years to come up with reccomendations.OH, well,.. our Government at work.!> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2011 Report Share Posted February 4, 2011 I am beginning to think it IS a conspiracy theory. I mean safe levels? When does the madness end? I say percholorate cocktails for every member of the House and Senate - make em doubles. Barb > > Saw last nite; > " Epa is going to examine establishing 'safe' levels of perchlorate (a chemical used in rocket fuel)in drinking water. This is a chemical known to cause Thyroid damage, especially in children and pregnant women, and has been confirmed to be in over 150 samples tested. " > > Don't waste your energy, standing up to cheer. They then cut to footage of an EPA representative, speaking to congress; She was making it clear that they are going to do a thurough cost/benefit analysis, weighing the costs of removing perchlorate from the water supplies vs. the 'costs' of,....well,..not. > Said the EPA will take at least 2 years to come up with reccomendations.OH, well,.. our Government at work.! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.