Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Iodoral vs RAI

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Because doctors are not educated on natural therapies. Iodine cannot be patented. One of the pills I took for a RAI treatment was over $6,000. There's money to be made off the sick. They don't want us well.

Steph

Iodoral vs RAI

Just curious, if anyone knows:If iodine in Iodoral induces programmed cell death,i.e. it kills cancer cells and protects healthy cells, why isn't regular iodine given instead of radioactive iodine to kill cancerous thyroid tissue? Is it only because regular iodine takes too long and requires more of patients(following a protocol)than they are willing to do? Marcy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you think this is the only reason? just wondering?

Konstantine

From: ladybugsandbees <ladybugsandbees@...>iodine Sent: Sat, October 23, 2010 10:09:23 AMSubject: Re: Iodoral vs RAI

Because doctors are not educated on natural therapies. Iodine cannot be patented. One of the pills I took for a RAI treatment was over $6,000. There's money to be made off the sick. They don't want us well.

Steph

Iodoral vs RAI

Just curious, if anyone knows:If iodine in Iodoral induces programmed cell death,i.e. it kills cancer cells and protects healthy cells, why isn't regular iodine given instead of radioactive iodine to kill cancerous thyroid tissue? Is it only because regular iodine takes too long and requires more of patients(following a protocol)than they are willing to do? Marcy

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Yes, I absolutely agree ! For example, even as recent as the 1970's, the AMA insisted that the foods we eat had nothing to do with cancer! And before that, in the 1940's, said that smoking was not a cause of cancer. As they say, follow the money. (sadly) Kathleen

Iodoral vs RAI

Just curious, if anyone knows:If iodine in Iodoral induces programmed cell death,i.e. it kills cancer cells and protects healthy cells, why isn't regular iodine given instead of radioactive iodine to kill cancerous thyroid tissue? Is it only because regular iodine takes too long and requires more of patients(following a protocol)than they are willing to do? Marcy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Money is absolutely a huge driver-- they want lifelong customers, not a

healthy and free populace. I think in the case of iodine there are a few

other factors. Number one, the phony " Wolf-Chaikoff " effect (I don't think

I spelled Wolf correctly) resulted in complete iodine phobia and even

though it has long been debunked they are still teaching iodine phobia in

medical school (and took iodine out of bread and flour and replaced it with

bromine). Second, Western medicine wants instant results for cancer

treatments, thus cutting and radiation, and there is even an unspoken but

definitely present tendency to believe that if the treatment doesn't poison

you and make you sick (e.g. chemo), it can't really be working.

The idea that building nutrition to get rid of disease is STILL argued

against vociferously. For example, all over Wikipedia, which is totally

hijacked by medical conventionalists who want to preserve the status quo,

the entries for nutritional supplements tend to say that there is no

evidence for nutrition affecting disease (or any other traditional or folk

or alternative modality). (And anyone who tries to edit this so-called

" open encyclopedia " to reflect the truth is instantly overruled by the

Wikipedia medical powers that be, and they are so quick about it and so

constant and omnipresent that those people HAVE to be being paid to do

it.) Pardon my passion on this, but it really chaps my hide that Wikipedia

is hijacked on health issues. But that's just an example of the level to

which Industrialized Medicine is protecting its territory.

--

>Yes, I absolutely agree ! For example, even as recent as the 1970's, the

>AMA insisted that the foods we eat had nothing to do with cancer! And

>before that, in the 1940's, said that smoking was not a cause of cancer.

>As they say, follow the money. (sadly) Kathleen

> Re: Iodoral vs RAI

>

>

>

>Because doctors are not educated on natural therapies. Iodine cannot be

>patented. One of the pills I took for a RAI treatment was over

>$6,000. There's money to be made off the sick. They don't want us well.

>

>Steph

~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~

--A.J. Muste

Link to comment
Share on other sites



The Merck Manual suggests Lugol's as treatment for both hypo and hyperthyroid conditions.

Dr. Abraham addressed the issues of the Wolffe Chaikoff issue here:

http://www.optimox.com/pics/Iodine/IOD-04/IOD_04.html

Steph

Re: Iodoral vs RAI>>>>Because doctors are not educated on natural therapies. Iodine cannot be >patented. One of the pills I took for a RAI treatment was over >$6,000. There's money to be made off the sick. They don't want us well.>>Steph~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~--A.J. Muste

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toxic Multinodular Goiter Toxic multinodular goiter develops autonomic function and secretes thyroid hormone within the nodules. is this what you're talking about?

Konstantine

From: ladybugsandbees <ladybugsandbees@...>iodine Sent: Sat, October 23, 2010 4:46:20 PMSubject: Re: Iodoral vs RAI

 That only happens in autonomic (spell?) functioning nodules. Not in the general individual. It is a rare condition.

Steph

Re: Iodoral vs RAI>>>>Because doctors are not educated on natural therapies. Iodine cannot be >patented. One of the pills I took for a RAI treatment was over >$6,000. There's money to be made off the sick. They don't want us well.>>Steph~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the

way ~~~~--A.J. Muste

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what she was alluding to is what the doctors also allude to. Therefore, this is important to know. Is there someone you can ask if this is what is meant by toxic nodules? or a separate incidence?

Konstantine

From: ladybugsandbees <ladybugsandbees@...>iodine Sent: Sat, October 23, 2010 6:53:48 PMSubject: Re: Iodoral vs RAI

 I have no idea. This message was written by Zoe (the first owner) on July 11, 2006 and I won't even try to guess what she was alluding to. I don't think I was even a member of the group back then. I may have been. There has been a lot more learned about iodine since 2006.

Re: Iodoral vs RAI>>>>Because doctors are not educated on natural therapies. Iodine cannot be >patented. One of the pills I took for a RAI treatment was over >$6,000. There's money to be made off the sick. They don't want us well.>>Steph~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the

way ~~~~--A.J. Muste

Link to comment
Share on other sites



I don't know if that is what she meant. Mechanisms not functioning properly can mean more than this type of nodule. There are many many enzyme reactions that can go haywire. Unfortunately I don't have time to chase this down right now. I am trying to complete my ND degree by January. I am also enrolled in another school and have a family. Time is tight - it's 11:30 here and I am still working.

Sorry.

Re: Iodoral vs RAI>>>>Because doctors are not educated on natural therapies. Iodine cannot be >patented. One of the pills I took for a RAI treatment was over >$6,000. There's money to be made off the sick. They don't want us well.>>Steph~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~--A.J. Muste

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...