Another View

[Guest guest]

What does this mean?????

Sonja

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Guest guest]

At 09:51 03.02.99 -0500, you wrote:

>What does this mean?????

>Sonja

It is just a " fiction " , as I said :-)

Apprechiate your disease, because DISEASE IS THE BEST YOUR BODY CAN DO :-)

What is wrong with doing the best? :-)

Dusan

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Guest guest]

Sure would like to know the meaning of all these e-mail addresses.

What's the purpous?? Who are they?

Thanks for answering!

Sonja

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Guest guest]

, I was told in our " briefing " this past Sunday that the masks DO filter

out the anthrax micron.

Geneva

Another view

> From: " marie i. schatz " <marys100@...>

>

> I saw an article yesterday on the DIA Early Bird (you can get this

compilation

> military related articles from around the country on the DIA site) where

an Army

> Officer was discussing Anthrax. It touched on what I have been really

really angry

> about - even more so that the shot itself.

> He said <paraphrase> We don't have enought detection equipment and the

systems we

> do have aren't very accurate. We are looking into new and more equipment.

> <paraphrase> We don't have enough chem protective gear and the gear we

have is

> terrible.

> I personally find it criminal - as in Congressman and Pentagon careerists

ought to

> be going to Leavenworth - that it has taken them 9 years since the Gulf

war to

> start to address this. This was recognized during and after the war as a

HUGE

> shortfall and lesson learned. Had they acted on this when they should

have Crowe

> never would have gotten his greedy foot in the door with anthrax. We

would have

> detection systems capable of giving warning so we could put on protective

gear that

> works. Then we would not only be protected against anthrax but against

all the

> other bio/chem agents out their we will currently die from. So what are

we

> supposed to do when we're dying from Soman or the Plague or some other

newly bio

> engineered weapon? Thank Cohen for sending us into war with our " anthrax

helmet "

> with our dying breath no doubt. They ought to be fired and arrested.

> in MI

> P.S. If our current charcoal filters protect us to 2 microns (I think)

anyone know

> the precise particle size of the weaponized anthrax spore?

> P.P.S. Please forward this as you see fit.

[Guest guest]

Hello All,

There is another view to our problem. If one withdraws some and looks at this

problem from some distance one would see the following:

1. Medical science has discovered the bodily functions that can be the

culprit in our feeling bad. This was done by Refetoff, Braverman, et al. in the

60's. So by 1970, medical science knows that there is no longer a direct

connection between the thyroid and symptoms. So while a deficient thyroid

secretion can cause the symptoms of hypothyroidism, so can deficiencies in the

discovered bodily functions of peripheral metabolism and peripheral cellular

hormone reception.

The thyroid predominately produces the prohormone thyroxine (T4) -- sort of like

crude oil. This crude must be then refined by the peripheral metabolism into

the active hormone (T3) -- which is akin to petrol or gasoline. Then the T3

must go to the cells' nuclei by way of the hormone reception -- very loosely

like the carburator atomizing the petrol and creating an air-gas mixture that

can be ignited to create power.

So cars don't run on crude and they don't run with some sort of means of

creating an air-gas mixture. We don't run unless we have triiodothyronine (T3)

and the cells can acquire the T3 from the circulating blood.

In short these functions, which are known to medical science, exists.

2. Just as your car mechanic checks on the carburator, fuel injectors,

ignition system, etc. when your car does not run, physicians should also check

on bodily functions that are known to exist that also produce the patient's

symptoms. This is fundamental to the medical philosophies of Evidence Based

Medicine and Differential Diagnosis.

So if you have continuting symptoms of hypothyroidism, the mimics of

hypothyroidism, those post thyroid operations of peripheral metabolism and

peripheral cellular hormone reception should be tested.

But they are not. The T3 and rT3 tests would be a good beginning, but they are

not recommended by endocrinology establishment. In fact, no test that would

suggest a T3 containing hormone replacement is recommended. In fact, they are

virtually banned.

3. Next, let us assume that we have arrived at non-prescribed test that

suggests a T3 replacement. Well, those are banned as well. Instead the

self-proclaimed masters of thyroid mechanics replace the fuel injectors with

spark plugs or something equally silly -- i.e., they want to replace the

deficient T3 with T4 (assuming all the time that peripheral metabolism and

peripheral hormone reception, the post thyroid functions, never fail.

So what do we have? In the name of combatting quackery, the victims of post

thyroid deficiencies are restricted from the information that would suggest the

prescription of needed but banned hormone replacements. In the name of

combatting quackery, with respect to the post thyroid deficient patient, they

promote quackery -- life-long quackery.

4. But we must step back and see where the fault is. The fault is in the

ignoring of medical science and the ignoring of medical protocols for diagnosis.

If your mechanic ignored the functionality of cars, he would be out of business

shortly. But since the endocrinology establishment is not subject to the same

requirements of providing good and proper service, they don't. They do not need

to know the complete functionality of the greater thyroid system (including the

post thyroid operations of peripheral metabolism and hormone reception) to make

money.

And they won't provide good service until things go horridly wrong for them. . .

.. .

Have a great day,