Guest guest Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 No; the TSH level before treatment pertains basically more to how long you've been hypothyroid without treatment. Luck, > I have a very high level of TSH when > I was first tested without any medication before. Does it mean the > hypothyroidism is more severe than the one who have the lowest level? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 Hi , the TSH is not a reliable test. the higher it is the more auto-antibodies you have and the higher the speed at which you will have a destroyed gland. it matters not what the result is. it could be at 3.0 or 13.0 the outcome is the same. We all have hashimoto`s thyroiditis . this is why the thyroid is damaged and do not work properly.the TSH do not move very fast , so you could be waiting years for it to show up anything.I have a slow progression of hash`s and my TSH test was only at 3.8 after 25 years , so you see how it works, the speed at which it travels= the number of auto-antibodies. angel.who have been sub-clinical for nearly 40 years, how i hate that word (sub clinical) grrrrr. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008  Hi Angel/ - its also not reliable for people who have other forms of hypothyroidism - me for example who doesnt have antibodies but loads of symptoms and a TSH of only 2.5, similarly our member Sharon, who also doesnt have antibodies. People with pituitary problems also wont have a rising TSH as the TSH is produced by the pituitary - and some other forms of hypoT which I think they refer to as secondary and/or central hypoT. All in all, as you say Angel - we could be waiting years for the TSH to go out of range - actually I was!! Gill the TSH is not a reliable test. the higher it is the more auto-antibodies you have and the higher the speed at which you will have a destroyed gland. it matters not what the result is. it could be at 3.0 or 13.0 the outcome is the same. We all have hashimoto`s thyroiditis . this is why the thyroid is damaged and do not work properly.the TSH do not move very fast , so you could be waiting years for it to show up anything.I have a slow progression of hash`s and my TSH test was only at 3.8 after 25 years , so you see how it works, the speed at which it travels= the number of auto-antibodies. angel.who have been sub-clinical for nearly 40 years, how i hate that word (sub clinical) grrrrr. Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1192 - Release Date: 21/12/07 13:17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 Hi Angel I dont have Hashimotos. Chris > > Hi , We all have hashimoto`s thyroiditis . this is why the thyroid is damaged and do not work properly. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 I also have Hashis,when diagnosed 2 yrs ago my TSH was 8 something, it is now 0.66 at last test, so mine seems to have lowered quite quickly, what does this mean then? My anti bodies at last test was 628--- On Sun, 31/8/08, GILL <gilljohnthurgo@...> All in all, as you say Angel - we could be waiting years for the TSH to go out of range - actually I was!! Gill the TSH is not a reliable test. the higher it is the more auto-antibodies you have and the higher the speed at which you will have a destroyed gland. it matters not what the result is. it could be at 3.0 or 13.0 the outcome is the same. We all have hashimoto`s thyroiditis . this is why the thyroid is damaged and do not work properly.the TSH do not move very fast , so you could be waiting years for it to show up anything.I have a slow progression of hash`s and my TSH test was only at 3.8 after 25 years , so you see how it works, the speed at which it travels= the number of auto-antibodies. angel.who have been sub-clinical for nearly 40 years, how i hate that word (sub clinical) grrrrr. Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.6/1192 - Release Date: 21/12/07 13:17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 Hi, Judith. I don't think that statement is correct. Some people who are hyperthyroid have Hashimoto's and some do not; although I believe Hashimoto's is the largest contributor. AFAIK I do not have elevated indicators for Hashimoto's. Here's some other causes: Hypothyroidism may result from one of the following: * *Congenital disease.* Approximately one in 3,000 babies in the United States is born with a defective thyroid gland or no thyroid gland at all. In most cases, the thyroid gland didn't develop normally for unknown reasons, but some children have an inherited form of the disorder. Often, infants with congenital hypothyroidism appear normal at birth. That's one reason why most states now require newborn thyroid screening. * *Pituitary disorder.* A relatively rare cause of hypothyroidism is the failure of the pituitary gland to produce enough TSH — usually due to a benign tumor of the pituitary gland. * *Pregnancy.* Some women develop hypothyroidism during or after pregnancy (postpartum hypothyroidism), often because they produce antibodies to their own thyroid gland. Left untreated, hypothyroidism increases the risk of miscarriage, premature delivery and preeclampsia — a condition that causes a significant rise in a woman's blood pressure during the last three months of pregnancy. It can also seriously affect the developing fetus. * *Iodine deficiency.* The trace mineral iodine — found primarily in seafood, seaweed, plants grown in iodine-rich soil and iodized salt — is essential for the production of thyroid hormones. In some parts of the world, iodine deficiency is common, but the addition of iodine to table salt has virtually eliminated this problem in the United States. Regards, .. .. > We all have hashimoto`s thyroiditis . this is why the thyroid is > damaged and do not work properly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 Hi , well if you don`t have hash`s , do you have graves or some other auto-immune problem.? if you are hypo then this is hash`s. if hyper then this is graves. they are all auto-immune in nature, if you have had auto-antibodie test that is negative, you are liklyto have them in the gland its self. if they are not in any blood or thyroid then I think they aresomewhere as you can not have a distroyed gland with out them.where is the logic- the gland has to be damaged by something duh angel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 Judith, I have hypo and can assure you I definately do not have hashimotos. Chris Chris > > Hi , well if you don`t have hash`s , do you have graves or some other auto-immune problem.? if you are hypo then this is hash`s. if hyper then this is graves. they are all auto-immune in nature, if you have had auto-antibodie test that is negative, you are likly > to have them in the gland its self. if they are not in any blood or thyroid then I think they are > somewhere as you can not have a distroyed gland with out them.where is the logic- the gland has to be damaged by something duh angel. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 Hi Angel I'm sorry but this is not true. Hashimotos and Grave's are the most common causes of thyroid disease in the UK but by no means the only ones. Some people are born hypothyroid as they have a congenital issue with their thyroid... Leah x they are all auto-immune in nature, if you have had auto-antibodie test that is negative, you are likly > to have them in the gland its self. if they are not in any blood or thyroid then I think they are > somewhere as you can not have a distroyed gland with out them.where is the logic- the gland has to be damaged by something duh angel. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.