Guest guest Posted July 10, 2010 Report Share Posted July 10, 2010 Hi Smita,I presume you used Fisher's z-transformation to normalize the distribution of correlation coefficient (in that case, should this not apply only to Pearson's correlation? What happens with Spearman's or Kendall's rank correlation?) This is the z transformation that z^' = 0.5 * ln([1+r] / [1-r]) where z^' = transformed z, r = correlation coefficient for the corresponding z, ie r0, and r1, ln = natural logarithmYou can get the corresponding z from z^' therefore by the following formula: z = z^' - ((3 * z^' + r) / 4 * n)These formulae were taken from the Statsdirect website:http://www.statsdirect.com/help/sample_size/sscorr.htm Best,Arin On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 2:30 AM, smita mali <smt_mali@...> wrote: [Attachment(s) from smita mali included below] Hello Sir, For calculating the sample size to do the correlation studies here is the formula N= [(z1-á/2 + z1-â) / |z’r0 – z’r1|]2 + 3 where, Information required POWER: probability of detecting a true effect ALPHA: probability of detecting a false effect (two sided: double this if you need one sided) R0: correlation coefficient under the null hypothesis (often 0) R1: correlation coefficient under the alternative hypothesis I am attaching the reference document and explanation for the derivation of this formula. Sir, I could not found anything simpler than this. It will be definitely welcome to hear from NetRUMians if anyone would come up with more information. Regards, Dr Smita Mali Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.