Guest guest Posted January 17, 2011 Report Share Posted January 17, 2011 Dear Members, Many studies of antidepressant and antipsychotic treatment effects showed there is an emphasis on " polypharmacy " in clinical practice, without much evidence of benefit and an increase in adverse effects. As the number of available medication options increases, so does the potential for polypharmacy, a practice with possible complications including greater number of side effects and the consequences of drug-drug interactions. It was also observed that many patients did not receive an adequate monotherapy trial, as defined by dose and duration, before progressing to polypharmacy. There appear to be no controlled studies showing the superiority of combinations of drugs over monotherapy. Also there is need to distinguish between rational and irrational polypharmacy. As response rates with polypharmacy for the treatment of depression in clinical practice are less and side effects are greater, I believe that the issue of polypharmacy in psychiatric practice should receive more scientific attention. It is important to understand the effects of polypharmacy on efficacy of treatment of depression as well as whether polypharmacy is instituted after appropriate initial monotherapy trials. Regards, Dr. Mangesh Bankar Assistant Prof. Pharmacology, Nagpur Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 Hi, True and I agree that irrationality is higher in Psychiatric practice and unchecked. The polypharmacy, frequent change of medicines, incremental doses, switch to newer medicines, sample practice all are rampant. Vijay > > Dear Members, > > Many studies of antidepressant and antipsychotic treatment effects showed there is an emphasis on " polypharmacy " in clinical practice, without much evidence of benefit and an increase in adverse effects. As the number of available medication options increases, so does the potential for polypharmacy, a practice with possible complications including greater number of side effects and the consequences of drug-drug interactions. It was also observed that many patients did not receive an adequate monotherapy trial, as defined by dose and duration, before progressing to polypharmacy. There appear to be no controlled studies showing the superiority of combinations of drugs over monotherapy. Also there is need to distinguish between rational and irrational polypharmacy. As response rates with polypharmacy for the treatment of depression in clinical practice are less and side effects are greater, I believe that the issue of polypharmacy in psychiatric practice > should receive more scientific attention. It is important to understand the effects of polypharmacy on efficacy of treatment of depression as well as whether polypharmacy is instituted after appropriate initial monotherapy trials. > > > > Regards, > > Dr. Mangesh Bankar > Assistant Prof. > Pharmacology, > Nagpur > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.