Guest guest Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Hi, Well said madam. While I do not have stiff lip, my lips surely wish to serve a bitter prologue. If we all self follow path of high ethics, have work culture of high morality, have self induced check and balance mechanisms, self analyse the righteous way to conduct clinicals, do we need a committee of ignorant bufoons to monitor, supervise and control us? Lesser the committees, better the monitoring of their performance. As we march towards the future, the dime a dozen committees are bound to pose migraine headache. The aura is already there. Power corrupts a person and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Let not the ECs get the stature that they do not deserve. Dr Vijay Thawani > > hello,PPT > presentation was tried to introduce a novel method of conducting an E- > workshop. It is a more active method of discussion even though it is still one > way. However the drawback is that it has to be downloaded first. And the file becomes too bulky.So lets now > revert back to our old faithful. > > > > After having seen the working of ethics > committee of the EU, we will next study > the British committees. > > > > BRITISH PERSPECTIVE > > > > > > The British > with their stiff upper lip have very n ideas and rightfully so. They do > not consider working of ethics committees as ethical activity. Read further to realize > the point. > > > > Compliance > is externally motivated while ethical activities are internally motivated. The goal of ethical activities should be to > include consideration of all stakeholders and possible long range impacts in > decision making. > > > > Any ethical > activity which is required is, by definition, > not ethical activity at all. When we attach ethics on the duties of the > compliance officer, we make it clear that genuine ethics > is of very little importance to us. > > > > Scenario in Britain > > Many hospital ethics committees have extended their usefulness by > assisting with issues such as informed consent, privacy of medical information > and organ transplantation. > > The ethics committee should again rise to the challenge of the 21st > century by making itself into an even more visible, valuable available > resource. > > > > Human cloning is still futuristic science fiction, so we can > for the time being shelve our concerns about human cloning. But stem cell research and therapy, gene > therapy, nanotechnology and other biomedical ethics issues are not science > fiction anymore. These issues will increasingly impact patient care in all > kinds of hospitals. > > One more post on British scene will > conclude this part .kunda > > > > > Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 hello, Over all this was an interesting discussion for me. I tried to introduce something new. I also tried to be as elaborate as possible on the subject. hope you too enjoyed reading the postings. with this I hand over the forum to the next moderator. Adios. kunda The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.