Guest guest Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 BlankBendamustine treatment of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders: A single-institution experience. Sub-category: Lymphoma Category: Lymphoma and Plasma Cell Disorders Meeting: 2010 ASCO Annual Meeting Citation: J Clin Oncol 28, 2010 (suppl; abstr e18542) Abstract No: e18542 Author(s): J. L. Knoble, J. Densmore, M. E. ; University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA Abstract: Background: Bendamustine ( has been an established treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD) in Germany for over 30 years. The drug has only recently gained FDA approval, however, and clinical experience with the drug in the United States is limited. The unique drug structure, with both alkylating and antimetabolite features, suggests a unique clinical activity profile including alkylator-resistant LPD. We evaluated B response and toxicity data and compared these outcomes with reported experience. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who received B at our institution for treatment of a LPD, both on or off clinical trials. 30 patients, median age 68.5, received 1 to 7 cycles of therapy from 9/2004 through 7/2009; 17 patients received the drug on clinical trial. B was used as a single agent (n=11) or in combination with rituximab ® (n=19). All patients were treated previously, 28 with at least one prior R- containing regimen. Dosing ranged from 60 to 120 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of each 3 or 4 week cycle. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was 73%. Complete response (CR/CRu) was 37%, and partial response (PR) was also 37%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months. Toxicity was evaluated using the CTCAE v3.0 grading system. Nausea was the most common reported toxicity (grade 1, n=8, grade 2, n=3) . Grade 1 skin rash was reported in 3 patients. Grade 1 thrombocytopenia was reported in 7 patients, and 3 patients required dose reduction/delay due to grade 3 toxicity. 3 patients developed grade 1 neutropenia, and 1 had grade 3 toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: B ± R responses correlated with previously reported findings among several individual LPD subtypes, with the exception of a poorer response in MCL patients. Our findings endorse significant clinical activity including patients with relapsed/refractory disease, with an acceptable toxicity profile. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LPD subtype n ORR (%) CR (%) PR (%) Median PFS (mo.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Follicular 14 13 (93) 6 (43) 7 (50) 22 Mantle cell 6 3 (50) 0 3 (50) 3.5 CLL/SLL 8 6 (75) 5 (62.5) 1 (12.5) 21 Diffuse large B cell 2 0 0 0 NA Totals 30 22 (73) 11 (37) 11 (37) 17 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.