Guest guest Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Greetings, I was asked off list to comment on the report copied below - well actually it was an LEF.org ad citing this report. The findings are interesting and may be worth studying further, but it is not a study on which to base conclusions - it is certainly not a justification for vitamin K supplementation to fight lymphoma - as suggested by LEF.org. First, as noted within (and for any study), the findings need to be replicated. If you did the same study 4 times, would each show a positive association? Or one? Next, the rate of use of vitamin K supplements in the NHL population and the control is not stated ... my expectation is that it's probably very low. How many people do you know that supplement with vitamin K? So the findings (an association with k-foods and lower risk of NHL), are weak for supplement use - which is noted by the investigator, but spun by LEF.org as : => " When vitamin K from supplements was examined, *intake of the vitamin was also shown to be protective up to a certain level,* above which increased intake offered no additional benefit, suggesting that it is not necessary to supplement with high doses for protection to occur. " <= Yikes! Supplementation was NOT shown to be protective! This is classic spin, and hype. Back to the report: Described by the investigator as " a fairly strong protective effect, " for a vitamin K *diet*, we are not provided with the actual numbers by the researcher. And we don't see independent peer comment - which tends to be more objective. Further, it's a retrospective study, based on recall of food habits, therefore subject to reporting bias. Those with NHL, for example, looking for explanation might have a different recollection of past eating habits than people who have not been diagnosed with a cancer. Perhaps. Alright, let's assume that memory served us well, and the diets were reported accurately. The weakness here is classic: the inclusion of lettuce and spinach in ones' diet could easily be a marker for having a healthier overall diet. Further, people who include such vegetables (because they are concerned about health) may also exercise more than people who don't. Is it the exercise, the healthier diet, or the lettuce, or the vitamin k in the lettuce? Impossible to know. Conversely, people who eat Twinkies daily may be at a higher risk for cancer - but not because Twinkies cause cancer! ... but because such a daily habit is a marker for having a relatively poor overall diet. Substitute, beer, whisky, chips, ... you name it, for the Twinkies. * Will vitamin companies make use of this report to promote sales of vitamin K? Of course. Lef.org is already doing so. Good idea? Not unless your deficient in it, and if so, better to eat more spinach. * Will supplementing with vitamin K slow down an existing lymphoma or prevent a relapse? Unfortunately I see nothing in this study to make such a claim. * Might such foods reduce risk of a first lymphoma? Maybe yes, maybe no. I suppose the protective role of ANY vitamin would be very difficult to prove without a very large prospective study.... where the participants are randomized to receive a placebo, or vitamin K supplementation (or a diet with lettuce and spinach, four times a week). The endpoint would be a significant difference in incidence of lymphoma in the two groups in say 10 or 20 years. You may recall that a similar study design - with many thousands of participants - was done to determine the risks and effects of HRT in women - which showed conclusively that HRT increased the risk of breast cancer. Karl == Vitamin K May Protect Against Developing Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Say Mayo Clinic Researchers ScienceDaily (Apr. 21, 2010) - In the first study of vitamin K and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk, researchers at the Mayo Clinic campus in Minnesota have found that people who have higher intakes of vitamin K from their diet have a lower risk of developing Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma is a cancer of the immune system and is the most common hematologic malignancy in the United States. ________________________________________ At the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), the researchers report that the risk of developing Non-Hodgkin lymphoma was approximately 45 percent lower for participants who had vitamin K intakes in the top quartile of intake in the study (>108 ug/day), compared to participants who had intakes in the bottom quartile (<39 ug/day). This association remained after accounting for other factors such as age, sex, education, obesity, smoking, alcohol use and intake of foods with high amounts of antioxidants. Vitamin K is a fat-soluble vitamin and is derived from either plants (phylloquinone or vitamin K1) or bacterial synthesis. This study estimated intake of the plant form of vitamin K from diet and supplement use. The most common sources of vitamin K1 in the diet include leaf lettuce and spinach, with smaller amounts found in other vegetables, vegetable oils and some fruits. Researchers at the Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center are studying the connection between diet and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk, and they became interested in a potential role for vitamin K. While vitamin K is best known for its essential function in several proteins involved in blood clotting (the name of the vitamin is derived from the German word " Koagulations " ), it also appears to be important in other biological processes, including inhibition of inflammatory cytokines thought to play a role in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, as well as pathways involved in cell cycle arrest and cell death. " These results are provocative, since they are the first work we have done on the connection between vitamin K and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and this is a fairly strong protective effect, " says the study's lead investigator, Cerhan, M.D., Ph.D., a cancer epidemiologist. " However, as with all new findings, this will need to be replicated in other studies. " The Mayo study enrolled 603 patients who were newly diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma as well as 1,007 matched cancer-free " control " participants. Researchers asked the participants to answer a food questionnaire about their usual intake of over 120 food items two years prior to their cancer diagnosis or enrollment into the study (controls). They also asked about use of a variety of supplements. Vitamin K intake was estimated from this data. While there was a clear trend showing that a greater intake of vitamin K from dietary sources was associated with a lower risk of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the use of vitamin K supplements presented a slightly different picture. Increasing intake of vitamin K from supplements did protect against Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but reached a point where the highest intake offered no reduction in risk. " The significance of this finding is unclear, " notes Dr. Cerhan, " but suggests that taking high doses of supplements is unlikely to be helpful. " Dr. Cerhan also notes that people taking certain oral anticoagulants or seizure medications should closely follow their physician's dietary recommendations with respect to vitamin K intake, since vitamin K can interfere with these drugs. " Whether the protective effect we observed is due to vitamin K intake, or some other dietary or lifestyle exposure, cannot be definitely assessed in this study, " notes Dr. Cerhan. " But these findings add to a lot of other data that support a diet that includes plenty of green leafy vegetables in order to prevent many cancers as well as other diseases. " The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.