Guest guest Posted June 14, 2006 Report Share Posted June 14, 2006 Use of prognostic factors in risk stratification at diagnosis and time of treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Lymphoid biology and diseases Current Opinion in Hematology. 13(4):266-272, July 2006. Gowda, Aruna a; Byrd, C a,b Abstract: Purpose of review: To review risk stratification strategies used in chronic lymphocytic leukemia at diagnosis to predict aggressiveness of disease and, at time of treatment, to predict duration of response. Recent findings: Several new prognostic factors can better assist clinicians in predicting the aggressiveness of chronic lymphocytic leukemia at diagnosis and the likelihood of maintaining a prolonged remission with treatment. This article reviews older prognostic factors such as [beta]2- microglobulin and thymidine kinase activity that have been partially validated by recently completed large studies. New prognostic factors such as interphase cytogenetics, immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene mutational analysis, and relevant secondary surrogate markers of immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene, including methylation of the zeta- associated protein gene, lipoprotein lipase overexpression, telomere length, and telomerase activity are reviewed. Some prognostic factors (interphase cytogenetics) but not others (immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene mutational status, zeta-associated protein expression) predict the duration of response to fludarabine- based combination strategies. Summary: Recent advances in risk stratification provide clinicians with tools to better predict outcome of chronic lymphocytic leukemia at the time of treatment and response to treatment at the time of developing symptomatic disease. © 2006 Lippincott & Wilkins, Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.