Guest guest Posted June 5, 2006 Report Share Posted June 5, 2006 Quality of life, depression and anxiety in chronic lymphocytic leukemia during phases of " watchful waiting " and active treatment. Meeting: 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Abstract No: 6603 Citation: Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 24, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 6603 Author(s): T. Levin Abstract: Background: Although chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) accounts for 25-30% of leukemia cases in the USA, little is known about its quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial burden. The purpose of this study was to compare QOL, anxiety and depression in watch and wait versus actively treated CLL. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, 105 patients were recruited from a CLL research database. 57 were classified as watch and wait and 48 as receiving or having received chemotherapy for CLL. The patients completed a battery of QOL measures including the SF-36, FACT-Lym, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Patient Health Questionnaire. Results: No differences were found between the treatment groups on the main QOL outcome measures - Mental Component Score, Physical Component Score, FACT-G, FACT-lymphoma (15 item), BDI-II and BAI. There was a clear age effect: younger patients (<60 years old) have worse Mental Component (p=0.0001), FACT-G (p=0.060), depression (p=0.014), Role Emotional (p=0.042), Mental Health (p=0.001), FACT- Emotional (p=0.0001) and FACT-Social (p=0.002) scores. Younger watch and wait patients seem to be particularly vulnerable to anxiety (p=0.052). Social and emotional QOL are statistically similar in both newly diagnosed and patients diagnosed six or more years ago, although patients do carry a greater physical QOL burden with time (p=0.05). Conclusions: Overall QOL, depression and anxiety are remarkably similar in watch and wait versus actively treated CLL, despite the latter group having, by definition, later stage disease. Younger patients (<60 years old) seem particularly vulnerable to having a reduced emotional and social QOL and having more depression. Younger watch and wait patients stood out as suffering from more anxiety. Patients diagnosed for more than 6 years carry a greater physical QOL burden, but social and emotional QOL are similar to newly diagnosed patients. Implications of these findings are considered. QOL, depression & anxiety in CLL: Watch & Wait vs. Active Treatment WATCH AND WAIT mean (SD) ACTIVE TREATMENT mean (SD) WATCH & WAIT vs. ACTIVE TREATMENT AGE AGE - TREATMENT INTERACTION Age < 60 (n = 34) Age>60 (n = 23) Age < 60 (n = 24) Age>60 (n = 24) SF-36 Mental Component Score 49.34 (8.03) 55.64 (5.69) 46.85 (10.90) 53.72 (6.34) - p=0.0001 - SF-36 Physical Component Score 52.82 (7.63) 50.01 (8.37) 53.22 (5.89) 45.55 (8.99) - p=0.001 - FACT-G 52.67 (12.53) 57.69 (5.38) 52.72 (6.63) 54.42 (7.40) _ p=0.060 - FACT-Lymphoma (15 items) 47.09 (7.34) The lower mean scores on the FACT and SF-36, the better the QOL colspan= " 1 " >50.57 (8.31) 48.21 (4.87) 46.15 (7.76) - - p=0.059 FACT-Lymphoma Physical (8 physical items only) 27.59 (3.61) 27.65 (4.28) 28.25 (1.89) 25.82 (4.58) - - p=0.09 Beck Anxiety Inventory 6.18 (5.47) 2.91 (3.04) 4.75 (4.01) 5.38 (6.46) - - p=0.052 Beck Depression Inventory-II 8.09 (6.07) 4.75 (4.54) 8.62 (6.78) 6.39 (4.54) - p=0.014 - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.