Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 LONG article regarding iron and Lymphoma --- Sue92195@... wrote: ) > From: Sue92195@... > Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 02:29:25 EDT > Reply-to: Copper-Depletion > Subject: [Copper-Depletion] Serum Ferritin - A > " Tumor Marker " for Malignant Lymphoma? > > I have finished my translation of a medical article > written in German about > lymphoma (cancer of the immune system) and > elevations of ferritin blood > levels. Please keep in mind, this is an amateur > translation which is surely > not perfect. We have tried hard to retain the exact > meanings of the original > investigators, but there are no guarantees of the > translation accuracy. I > used a scanner, lots of special character needed > manual corrections, and an > on-line German translator for a start. Then I had a > lot of help from two of > my German lymphoma friends at nhl-info to whom I > give my hearty thanks. > > The two-column Word for Window version with German > on left and the English > translation on the right is in the group files > section or attached to this > e-mail. > > ========================================================= > > > Original Papers > Onkologie 1990;13:102-108 > > Serum Ferritin - A " Tumor Marker " for Malignant > Lymphoma? > > Aulbert(a), O. Steffens( > > (a) Ev. Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Akademisches > Lehrkrankenhaus d. Freien > Universität Berlin > ( Innere Klinik und Poliklinik (Tumorforschung), > Westdeutsches > Tumorzentru, Universitätsklinikum Essen > > Summary and Key Words > > Serum ferritin concentration as a tumor marker > was investigated in 535 > patients with malignant lymphomas. The study > included 207 patients with > Hodgkin disease, 196 patients with low grade > non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 132 > patients with high grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma of > different tumor stages. > > Increased serum ferritin concentrations were > found in 54% of the > patients. When we divided the group according to > disease stage, we then > found serum ferritin concentration was elevated in > 12.3% of patients with > stage I, in 33.8% of patients with stage II, in > 72.2% of patients with stage > III and in 94% of patients with stage IV. The serum > ferritin levels > correlated with the tumor mass. There was no > significant difference between > Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. > > Patients with concomitant hepatocellular > disease and also patients in > chemotherapy had high levels of serum ferritin. In > patients with low grade > malignant non-Hodgkin lymphoma which included bone > marrow infiltration, serum > ferritin levels correlated better with the tumor > stages according to Rai > (Endnote A) than with the Ann Arbor classification. > > The serum ferritin concentration closely > followed the activity of the > disease. Ferritin levels dropped with cancer > treatment, and patients > achieving complete remissions normalized their serum > ferritin levels. With > tumor relapse or tumor progression, serum ferritin > levels increased again. > > The data suggest that the serum ferritin > concentration can be used for > monitoring cancer condition of patients with > malignant lymphoma. Because of > its limited specificity and low sensitivity, it > cannot be used as a screening > test. Nevertheless, it is a helpful additional > parameter for the control of > the activity of the disease. > > Ferritin - Malignant Lymphoma - Tumor Marker - Tumor > Stage > > Introduction > > Along with hemosiderin (insoluble iron > storage), ferritin represents the > substantial intracellular iron-binding protein [1]. > It can be found in almost > every part of the human body, above all however in > the liver, spleen, and > bone marrow. In small quantities, it is also in the > circulating blood. Its > concentration amount is normally 20-150 ng/ml [2]. > Serum ferritin > concentration represents a very reliable measure for > the storage iron. The > correlation between serum ferritin concentration and > iron storage is so > accurate that 1 ng/ml ferritin blood serum is > equivalent to F-10 mg storage > iron [2-9]. Accordingly primary or secondary iron > overload statuses are > partially characterized by substantial increases in > the serum ferritin > concentration by [10-14]. > > Increased serum ferritin concentration is also > found during inflammatory > illnesses and infections [15-17]. Here the ferritin > has obviously the meaning > acute phase protein, just like other tests > representing systemic response to > inflammation -- Lactic Dehydrogenase (LDH), > C-Reactive Protein (CRP), > Fibrinogen (a soluble plasma protein), Haptoglobin > (a plasma protein > increased in certain inflammatory disorders) or the > BSG [blut Senkungs > Geschwinidigkeit, blood / separating or going down / > speed OR speed of > separation of the blood]. > > Recently, elevated serum ferritin > concentrations were also found in > various tumor illnesses. With certain forms of > leukemia, increased serum > ferritin is a genuine tumor marker [18, 19]. > However, since elevated serum > ferritin can also indicate increased iron storage, > the acceptance of serum > ferritin as either a " tumor-associated marker " or as > an " acute phase protein " > with solid tumor cancers is still being > controversially discussed [20-27, 32]. > > Lymphatic system illnesses seem to be a special > case [10, 22, 26-33]. > Thus, with Hodgkin’s disease, the lymphocytes in > the stricken spleen and also > the peripheral blood show an increased ferritin > synthesis and secretion > [28-31], however, this data did not remain without > contradiction [27, 33]. > Accordingly the cause of increased concentrations of > serum ferritin with > malignant lymphoma is not settled. The present study > examines the serum > ferritin concentrations of 535 patients with > non-Hodgkin lymphoma and with > Hodgkin’s lymphoma as well as their dependency of > the degree of tumor > propagation and of progression of disease. > > Methods > > Criteria of patients selected in the study > > Patients with malignant lymphomas of various > histological types and > various degrees of tumor propagation were examined. > Patients were excluded > from the investigation if their disease was > accompanied by blood loss in the > intestine, the urinary passage or the genitals; > patients with liver > illnesses, which accompanied with > laboratory-chemically understandable liver > cell decay or with protein synthesis disturbances, > with renal protein losses, > characters of a infection or a inflammation > reaction, with several preceded > blood transfusions with higher grade transformations > or parenteral > (intravenous) nutrition. > > Laboratory tests > > All hematological and chemical measurements > were performed in the > laboratories of the internal hospital and health > center (tumor research) of > the university clinic in Essen, the West German > tumor center, as well as in > the central laboratory of the St. Barbara Hospital > in Gladbeck. Ferritin, > transferrin, iron, GOT, GPT, gamma GT, LDH, total > protein, creatinine and > urea were all measured by peripheral blood testing. > > Measurement of Ferritin > > The serum ferritin concentrations were measured > by an enzyme immunoassay > (12). A commercially available enzyme immnoassay was > used (Ferrizyme of > Abbott Labs). The ferritin serum levels were charted > and shown as standard > curves of ferritin concentration. The average, > which was determined at 60 > healthy persons was 45 ng/ml (18-114 ng/ml) in > females and 83 ng/ml (28-186 > ng/ml) in males. > > Histological Investigation > > The histological and cytotoxic analysis of the > tumor sample was performed in > pathological Institute of the University Clinic as > well as parallel to it in > pathological Institute of the University of Kiel > (lymphoma register). The > non-Hodgkin lymphoma was classified according to the > Kieler Classification > System (Endnote C) [3-4]. > > Determination of the Tumor Mass > > The classification of the tumor mass was > differentiated from + to +++++. > The tumor propagation of the lymphomas were > subdivided into the tumor stages > I-IV after either the Ann Arbor (Endnote [35] or > the Rai (Endnote A) > classification [36]. > > Results > > Clinical levels of the serum ferritin > concentration in relationship to > tumor propagation were evaluated to determine if > ferritin level could be a > tumor associated marker with lymphatic system > illnesses. We analyzed the > serum ferritin level in 535 patients with malignant > lymphoma who were > monitored or treated in the years 1983-1988 and > related the results to the > disease tumor progression. In a second step we > examined different > interference factors which limit the value of serum > ferritin concentration as > indicator for the tumor propagation. Beyond that we > continually monitored > serum ferritin concentration over the entire disease > process and related it > with the proliferation activity the lymphatic tumor > illness. > > The Dependency of the Serum Ferritin Concentration > on the Tumor Propagation > > From the patients examined by us, there were > 207 with Hodgkin’s > lymphoma, 196 with low-grade non-Hodgkin’s > lymphoma, and 132 with high-grade > non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Pathologically increased > serum ferritin concentrations > were found in the stage I by 12.3%, in the stage II > by 33.8%, in the stage > III by 72.7% and in the stage IV by 94% of the > patients. There was not a > significant difference between the patients with > Hodgkin disease and those > with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The serum ferritin > concentration rose with > increasing tumor propagation on (table 1, picture 1) > While there was only a > very slight tendency toward hyperferritinemia (high > ferritin) in the stages > I and II, the serum ferritin concentration in the > tumor stage III was > significantly for over the standard value. Even > higher serum ferritin > concentration showed up in the stage IV. On the > other hand, patients who > achieved a full remission again displayed normal > serum ferritin concentration. > > Table 1 Serum Ferritin Concentration in patients > with untreated malignant > lymphomas (n=535). > > Hodgkin n > > Stage I 90 ± 4T ng/ml 28 > Stage II 138 ± 65 ng/ml 44 > Stage III 256 ± 108 ng/ml 28 > Stage IV 490 ± 144 ng/ml 24 > Full Remission 72 ± 45 ng/ml 83 > > Non-Hodgkin-L. n > > Stage I 68 ± 43 ng/ml 56 > Stage II 124 ± 51 ng/ml 43 > Stage III 214 ± 117 ng/ml 48 > Stage IV 719 ± 360 ng/ml 69 > Full Remission 61 ± 43 ng/ml 112 > > * Standard deviations > > > Disrupted correlation between serum ferritin > concentration and tumor > propagation > > The observations of increased serum ferritin > concentrations with > different malignant tumors and inflammatory > illnesses suggests that it is not > a specific tumor-associated marker for lymphatic > system illnesses. During our > investigations different interference factors > presented themselves, which > limited the clinical value of the serum ferritin > concentration as a > tumor-associating marker > > Elevated serum ferritin concentration under a > chemotherapy: > > Ferritin is present in the blood serum in very > low concentration > compared with total body’s stores of ferritin. So, > serum ferritin > concentration can quickly rise by release of > ferritin from damaged cells. > Such a situation is conceivable in the context of > chemotherapy. Therefore, we > have measured the serum ferritin concentration in > patients with malignant > lymphoma directly before and during any tumor > fighting therapy (chemotherapy, > radiation, etc.) > > A clear elevation of the serum ferritin > concentration was observed under > chemotherapy (fig. 2). It is remarkable that the > increase of ferritin during > chemotherapy was more pronounced in those patients > whose initial > concentration serum ferritin was the highest before > being treated. These > findings show that the extent of the serum ferritin > increases under a > chemotherapy depends upon the serum ferritin > concentration before the patient > has been treated - and thus correlates with the > tumor stage or the tumor > mass. > > Elevated, high serum ferritin concentrations > are found in the present a > hepatocellular damage: As the most substantial iron > storage organ, the liver > indicates a particularly high content of > intracellular ferritin. The question > therefore arises to what extent liver cell damage > also accompanying limits > the usability of the serum ferritin in concentration > with malignant > lymphomas. In order to check this, we examined our > patients with both > conditions of malignant lymphoma and simultaneous > liver cell damage. In > figure 3 the patients, whose pathologically > increased laboratory-chemical > parameters (GOT. GPT, Gamma GT) of liver damage, > individually according to > their tumor stage. It is remarkable that the serum > ferritin concentration of > these patients was elevated over the tumor-dependent > serum ferritin > concentration of the other lymphoma patients. > > These findings show that when there is more > hepatocellular damage the > correlation between serum ferritin concentration and > tumor propagation degree > is faulty. > > Deviations of serum ferritin level in relationship > to lymphoma stage depended > upon the classification system used: > > Remarkably low serum ferritin concentrations > became apparent in a number > of early low grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients > categorized as Stage IV by > the Ann Arbor criteria [47] only because of bone > marrow involvement or > categorized as Stage III only because of the spread > of cancer which is still > at a minimal disease level. As can be seen in > figure 4, these values were > clearly under the appropriate ferritin > concentrations of other lymphomas in > Stage III or IV. > > This apparent lack of correlation between serum > ferritin concentration > and tumor propagation could be avoided when these > patients were staged > according to the Rai Classification System (Endnote > A) [36]. This > classification is preferable for lymphomas > infiltrating the bone marrow as > it uses the lymphatic marrow infiltration on the > blood formation and > therefore takes into consideration the tumor mass. > > The correlation of the serum ferritin concentration > with the disease process > > As a further step, we examined, to what extent > the serum ferritin > concentration can be a measurement of disease > progression with patients with > malignant lymphoma. We measured the serum ferritin > concentrations during the > entire duration of the disease and compared these > with the disease progress > Figure 5 shows serum ferritin movements of patients > during primary induction > therapy. It can be observed that a decline of > elevated serum ferritin levels > parallel the therapy-induced remission. The amount > of decrease in serum > ferritin is not dependent upon of the prior > elevation level of the untreated > lymphoma patient’s serum ferritin nor is it > dependent on initial tumor stage. > With achieving a full remission, serum ferritin > concentration completely > normalized. > > During further disease progression, serum > ferritin concentrations were > monitored and showed that a lymphoma relapse was > accompanied by increasing > serum ferritin concentration (fig. 6). If > additional chemotherapy induced > another remission, the serum ferritin levels were > again decreased. If the > tumor progression was therapeutically not > controllable, the serum ferritin > concentration continued to rise uninfluenced by > therapy. These results show > that the serum ferritin concentration is a useful > parameter for process > evaluation of our patients. > > Discussion > > So far, no specific tumor associated marker is > well-known for malignant > Hodgkin’s disease or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. For > diagnostic assistance with > the care of patients with malignant lymphomas, one > fell back on the > relatively nonspecific markers or acute phase > proteins, for example the blood > corpuscle lowering rate, the lactic dehydrogenase > (LDH), the Haptoglobin (a > protein binding to hemoglobin which is decreased in > certain inflammatory > disorders), ferritin, and beta-2 microgloblin. > > The problem with these markers, however, is > their small sensitivity > which does not support early diagnosis of disease. A > measurable elevation of > these markers usually takes place only during a > large tumor propagation, and > even then the elevations largely overlaps normal > levels. Besides this, > specificity is also limited since we know situations > other than lymphoma can > cause modification of these parameters. > > Observations from this study point toward the > fact that the serum > ferritin concentration represents a clinically > useful diagnostic parameter > with malignant lymphomas [10, 15, 26-33], and > additionally, with other > different malignant tumors [20-25]. In the majority > of the investigations, > the serum ferritin concentration correlates with the > tumor mass and with the > process of the illness. On the other hand , other > diseases have been shown to > be accompanied by increased ferritin levels [2-9] > Also, liver cell damage or > inflammation could cause increase in [15-17] serum > ferritin concentration. > > The first step in our investigation was to > measure untreated lymphoma > patients for their serum ferritin concentration in > relationship to tumor > stage. The serum ferritin concentrations of > untreated lymphoma patients were > increased in 54% of the cases. The serum ferritin > concentration increased in > relationship with increasing tumor propagation > (table 1, fig. 1). > > Our data is confirmed by the reports of other > groups which found > increased serum ferritin concentrations with > malignant lymphomas [26, 27, 33, > 38-40]. These studies also showed that in both > Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s > lymphoma, increasing tumor propagation was > accompanied by rising serum > ferritin concentration, elevations significantly > above the normal range > especially in the tumor stages III and IV. The > cause for this > hyperferritinemia was thereby attributed to a > disturbance of the iron > metabolism with an increase of the RES ferritin > store [26]. (See Endnote E) > > In order to be able to measure the specificity > of the hyperferritinemia > with malignant lymphomas, different factors were > examined, which disturb the > relationship between the serum ferritin > concentration and the tumor status. > These factors have to be known to assess and > evaluate this tumor marker. > > There are indications that malignant tumor cells can > both elevate and > decrease levels of serum ferritin. Thus, it has > been shown that tumor cells > in vitro synthesize ferritin [41].Also in breast > cancer tissue, ferritin > could be proven by Immune fluorescence [42]. The > direct proof of a increased > ferritin synthesis held true for leukemia cells [18, > 19, 43]. Likewise it > could be shown that normal lymphocytes as well as > malignant lymphatic cells > synthesize and contain ferritin at higher > concentrations [28, 30]. > > The question therefore arises, could some of the > disintegrating lymphatic > cells release measurable quantities of intercellular > ferritin which causes an > increase of the serum ferritin concentration. This > question is of importance, > since patients mostly undergo chemotherapy during > the active phase of the > disease, and, in such cases, increased serum > ferritin concentration cannot > always be associated with tumor activity. > > Therefore, we compared the serum ferritin > concentration of our untreated > lymphoma patients with that of the lymphoma patients > currently under > chemotherapy. In all cases, there was a clear > elevation of serum ferritin > with patients in chemotherapy. This increased > elevation was more pronounced > in cases with larger tumor mass. (fig. 2). > > These findings agree with other reports that > high intracellular ferritin > concentration exist in tumor cells and in lymphoma > cells [22, 31, 39, 43-45]. > They indicate that the rise of the serum ferritin > concentration actually > originates by the release of ferritin from > intracellular lymphatic cells. > This would explain why larger tumor masses release > more ferritin during > successful chemotherapy treatments. On the other > hand, these findings lead to > the conclusion that while currently under > chemotherapy, level of serum > ferritin does not relate to tumor propagation or the > activity of the disease. > > Increased serum ferritin concentration with > chronic and acute liver > illnesses has been observed [9, 17, 37, 38]. This is > based on the fact that > this hyperferritinemia is to be explained by an > increased release of ferritin > from damaged liver cells. Considering the > extraordinarily low physiological > serum ferritin concentration in the blood, it is to > be expected that a such a > ferritin release from the damaged liver tissue leads > to measurable increase > in serum ferritin concentration [1, 37]. On the > other hand the liver > represents also the reduction organ for the > ferritin, so that a liver cell > damage can also be accompanied with a decreased > reduction rate and so cause > an increase of the serum ferritin concentration > [46]. > > In malignant lymphatic system illnesses, we > observe liver cell damage > due to direct infiltration of lymphoma in the liver > or due to hepatoxic > therapy. With the examination of this connection > (fig. 3) high serum ferritin > concentration were found elevated in all cases even > comparing the ferritin > values to comparable patients with the same degree > of tumor propagation > without simultaneous liver damage. This data agreed > with identical findings > of other authors [38] and to demonstrated that in > such situations of liver > damage, the serum ferritin concentration could not > be used as a > tumor-associated marker. > > A dependency of the serum ferritin in > concentration of the histological > type of the non-Hodgkin lymphoma has already been > described by some other > authors [47]. Other authors could find no > relationship between the > histological type and the elevation of the serum > ferritin concentration [27, > 48]. Also, we found with a part of the patients with > low grade lymphomas of > the tumor stages III and IV after the Ann Arbor > classification [35], > inadequate low serum ferritin concentration clearly > under the values of other > histological lymphoma types of same tumor stages > (fig. 4). These were mainly > cases of low grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), > partially with a very > early generalized propagation of lymph nodes, and > which had to be attributed > to the Ann Arbor classification Stage III, even if > these lymph nodes were > still small. The same applied also to patients, with > whom according to the > biological characteristics of low grade lymphoma had > a bone marrow > involvement who were classified Stage IV from the > beginning by the Ann Arbor > system, even if the degree of the marrow > infiltration, i.e. the tumor mass, > was not yet particularly pronounced. In these > cases, a discrepancy between > the tumor stage is present by the Ann Arbor > classification and of the actual > tumor mass. > > Unlike to the Ann Arbor classification system, > [35] the Rai > classification (Endnote A) [36] corresponds more to > certain blood parameters > and the actual size of tumor mass. Thus, if one > applies the Rai > classification (Endnote A) to this kind of > non-Hodgkin lymphoma with bone > marrow involvement, then better correlations show up > between the serum > ferritin concentration and the tumor propagation. > > During the evaluation of ferritin as a tumor > marker, the question arises > whether changes of tumor growth show up clearly and > fast enough and in > measurable modifications of the serum ferritin > concentration and whether > these modifications of the serum ferritin > concentration occur early enough to > be clinically usable. > > In this connection it could be shown that the > early achieved tumor > regression was accompanied by a decrease in serum > ferritin concentration. > When a full remission was achieved, a complete > normalization of the serum > ferritin concentration occurred (fig. 5). A relapse > or a renewed tumor > progression was accompanied by a renewed > elevation of the serum > ferritin concentration. The change of the serum > ferritin concentration > occurred not substantially before other proven tumor > markers and therefore > cannot be used as a reliable early symptom, but only > as one among several > parameters. Our investigations are acknowledged by > other working groups. As a > cause an increased synthesis and secretion of > ferritin from the lymphatic > cells was assumed here. Also with patients with > acute lymphoblastic leukemia > (ALL) a rise of the serum ferritin concentration > showed up with progressive > tumor growth and a normalization of serum ferritin > concentration when > achieving a full remission. The explanation for this > is likewise an increased > synthesis and release of intracellular ferritin from > the leukemic lymphatic > cells [22, 28, 31, 49-51]. > > Our findings of a close relationship between > serum ferritin > concentration and tumor mass or the proliferation of > the illness and also in > a particular rise of the serum ferritin > concentration for the patient under a > cytotoxic chemotherapy allows the conclusion that > hyperferritinemia is caused > by increased synthesis and release of ferritin from > the malignant cells. This > does not exclude the possibility that the release of > ferritin as a > nonspecific response of the RES (See endnote E) in > the sense of one " acute > phase proteins " plays a certain role. Apparently > monocytes are responsible > for the secretion of ferritin in this case [27, 52]. > Similar processes seem > also to be the cause of hyperferritinemia with > chronic infections [15-17]. On > the other hand observations exist according to which > the hyperferritinemia is > interpreted with malignant tumors as indicator for > an increased RES (see > endnote E) ferritin storage. As a cause for this a > perturbated iron release > from the RES [26, 40] or a rearrangement of the iron > of the perturbated > Erythropoiesis (Endnote D) into the RES ferritin > storage is being considered > as a possibility [32]. This tumor-conditioned > disturbance of transferrin and > iron metabolism leads to an iron-overload of storage > iron and thereby to a > hyperferritinemia, which correlates with the extent > of the tumor illness > [32]. Possibly are situated also several of these > causes the rise of the > serum ferritin concentration with patients with > malignant lymphomas as the > base [33, 39]. > > Our data show that serum ferritin concentration > is a useful additional > parameter with the care of patients with malignant > lymphomas. Due to the > smaller specificity and low sensitivity of serum > ferritin levels, it should > remain as a monitoring devise after diagnosis of > lymphoma has been confirmed. > It must be realized that hyperferritinemia has > other cause (blood > transfusions, liver cell damage, chronic > Inflammations or infections) which > must always be excluded [1]. Unfortunately, > elevation of the serum ferritin > concentration does not show early in the disease > process. Rather the changes > in serum ferritin levels follow parallel to the > tumor progression or to tumor > recovery and serve as an additional accompanying > parameter for the process of > evaluating malignant lymphoma. > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.