Guest guest Posted November 9, 2001 Report Share Posted November 9, 2001 Two stories from NHL-low list: Popular Arthritis Drug May Enhance Radiation Effects Against Cancer ATTENTION: Medical editors PHILADELPHIA, Nov. 7 (AScribe News) -- Researchers at Jefferson Medical College have shown in the laboratory that a popular arthritis drug, Vioxx, may enhance the effects of radiation against cancer. Interest in such arthritis drugs, known as cox-2 inhibitors and which include the well known drug Celebrex, stems from the mechanism by which they apparently work against cancerous tumors. According to Adam Dicker, M.D., Ph.D., assistant professor of radiation oncology at Jefferson Medical College of Jefferson University in Philadelphia and a member of Jefferson's Kimmel Cancer Center, who led the work, the drugs appear to affect angiogenesis, a process by which a tumor's growth is fed by the development of blood vessels. A new field of research on anti-cancer drugs known as angiogenesis inhibitors has sprung up in recent years based on the concept that by blocking the formation of blood vessels, cancers cannot grow or spread without a blood supply to feed them. Dr. Dicker presents his team's findings November 7 at the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology meeting in San Francisco. According to Dr. Dicker, tumors actually make cox-2, an enzyme, and nearly every tumor " overexpresses, " or makes too much of it. It is also present in blood vessels associated with the tumor, though the enzyme's precise role is uncertain. In animal models, both Vioxx and Celebrex have shown anti-tumor properties, in some cases even shrinking tumors, possibly through an anti-angiogenic effect. Other researchers have demonstrated in animal models that Celebrex enhances the effects of radiation on tumors. But little had been known, Dr. Dicker explains, about the effects of Vioxx. Dr. Dicker, using various laboratory tests and a number of different models for angiogenesis, showed the drug also enhances the effects of radiation on tumor cells by interfering with angiogenesis. " People are excited about cox-2 inhibitors because they appear to lower toxicity for patients with arthritis, " he says. " In addition, they also enhance radiotherapy effects and have anti-angiogenic activity. " Angiogenesis has become one of the hottest areas of cancer research. Some researchers believe that anti-angiogenesis drugs will expand the armamentarium of drugs that will halt cancer growth, with the disease becoming more a chronic illness patients can live with. Dr. Dicker is leading a number of clinical trials looking at the use of these inhibitors for the treatment of cancer. At the same time, he chairs the -2 Inhibitor Working Group at the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, a federally funded cancer clinical trials organization that is conducting trials nationwide on the use of cox-2 and its role in cancer therapy. " There will be a lot of research in this area - it's an exciting time, " Dr. Dicker says. === http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi- 0111070348nov07.story?coll=chi%2Dnewsnationworld%2Dhed Cancer treatment raises early hopes Combined therapy uses X-rays to stir tumor-killing gene By Gorner Tribune science reporter Published November 7, 2001 Cancer researchers on Tuesday reported promising, but very preliminary, results from clinical trials of a novel high-tech therapy invented at the University of Chicago that provides powerful, precisely targeted treatments for tumors generally considered hopeless. The results announced Tuesday at a convention of cancer specialists meeting in San Francisco may herald the birth of a new anti-cancer strategy, one that marshals a number of weapons at once. The procedure brings gene therapy, angiogenesis inhibitors and radiation therapy to bear on localized tumors. It also could make lower doses of radiation more effective, which would benefit the estimated 60 percent of all cancer patients who undergo radiation each year in the U.S. In the new therapy, doctors inject into tumors a modified flu virus carrying the supercharged gene for a potent immune system protein called tumor necrosis factor. TNF is a central regulator of the inflammatory response, crucial to wound healing, but so powerful that the body summons it only with great care, disarming it quickly when its job is done. Once inside the tumor, the TNF gene sits quietly like a Trojan horse until the cancer is zapped by radiation. The X-ray beam causes the gene to switch on and start churning out high doses of TNF, which kills the tumor cells by destroying their blood supply. Seven advanced cancer patients at three institutions, all of whom had failed standard treatment and were due to receive radiation therapy, volunteered for the experiment. All had solid tumors accessible for repeated injections. They were to receive five escalating doses of the virus to determine safety levels. Even though the tumors were large and the first dose was minimal, all the patients immediately responded, some dramatically. In two of the seven, the tumors being tested simply disappeared. In two other patients, they shrank drastically. In the remaining patients, the cancer was held in check--it stopped growing. Experts said that such a response--seven out of seven--is extremely rare in Phase 1 cancer trials, which are not designed to determine the effectiveness of new drugs, only whether they are toxic to patients. But even to the U. of C. researchers, who have been working to perfect the treatment for 10 years, the initial results came as a surprise. " Certainly, this is very early data with just a few patients, but the important thing is the concept: You can control gene therapy with radiation, " said Dr. Ralph Weichselbaum, the U. of C.'s chairman of radiology and cellular oncology who invented the combined therapy. " Potentially, it could convert radiation to a systemic treatment-- using X-rays to turn on cancer-killing genes wherever they find tumor cells. " The synergistic technique so far has been shown to cause tumor regression in laryngeal, prostate, glioma, esophageal and colorectal cancers. The new data include cancers of the breast, pancreas and lung. But in principle, it could work for any solid tumor, Weichselbaum said, and those constitute 85 percent of all cancers. The first human trials of the combined therapy were good news to cancer pioneers. " Ralph Weichselbaum is outstanding, a visionary thinker in cancer biology and radiation therapy, " said Harvard University researcher Dr. Judah Folkman, who for 30 years has developed his theory of anti- angiogenesis that has led to the creation of tumor-starving drugs. " I find these results very encouraging, " Folkman said. " It's highly unusual to see this kind of efficacy in a Phase 1 trial. And it's a very elegant way to do anti-angiogenic therapy. " To gene therapy pioneer Dr. French , of the University of Southern California, " This is the first example of a true gene-therapy vector for cancer therapy. The idea makes sense. It has the right feel to it. And it will be a tremendous advance in the field. " Preliminary results were reported Tuesday at the annual meeting of the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology in San Francisco by physicians from the University of Kentucky, Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York and U.S. Oncology in Dallas. Since 1999, Weichselbaum has worked with GenVec, a biotech company in Gaithersburg, Md. GenVec spokesmen said they will begin at least one major randomized Phase 2 study as early as next year. In another trial under way at the University of Chicago, 18 to 30 patients with soft tissue sarcomas, a rare but dangerous cancer, will undergo the TNF-radiotherapy treatment. They will receive two injections during the first week and one for each of the next four weeks. Radiation therapy aimed at the injected tumor will begin the first week and continue for up to five weeks. The first patient, Goldberg, 50, of Chicago, has seen the tumor on his right knee shrink dramatically after five weeks of therapy. He reports no side effects, beyond the discomfort of the first injections. " They used a bigger needle the first time and that hurt, " he said. " Since then they shifted to a smaller-gauge needle and now I barely feel a thing. " __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.