Guest guest Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 Something must have been lost in someone's translation about the CKit study, because according the abstract of the article in Blood, this is about AML not CLL: Distinct forms of tyrosine kinase domain (TKD), juxtamembrane domain, exon 8, and internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations of c-KIT , were observed in about 46% of core binding factor leukemia (CBFL) patients. To evaluate their prognostic significance, 67 adult CBFL patients were analysed to ascertain the c-KIT mutation status. In AML with t(8;21), the presence of c-KIT TKD mutation at codon 816 (TKD816) was associated with a high white blood cell count at diagnosis (median 29.60x109/L) and a higher incidence (33%) of extramedullary leukaemia (EML) during the course of the disease. Data also showed that the TKD816 mutation patients (n = 12) had a significantly higher incidence of relapse and a lower overall survival (OS) at 24 months, compared with the 17 c-KIT unmutated (c- KIT-) patients (90% vs 35.3%, p = 0.002; 25% vs 76.5%, p = 0.006, respectively). No difference in relapse incidence (p = 0.126) and OS (p = 0.474) was observed between the c-KIT mutated other than TKD816 (n = 7) and the c-KIT- patients. These findings indicate that c-KIT TKD816 mutation has a negative impact on the outcome of AML with t (8;21). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.