Guest guest Posted January 9, 2005 Report Share Posted January 9, 2005 Hi Chuin: I almost always end up with a big smile on my face after reading your posts. Including, especially, this one! I agree with the point you make. But the study appears to go much further than that. They do not limit their observations regarding LBM and BP only to stress-related spikes in BP. They very specifically stated that: " The BP levels and changes were positively correlated with LBM. " So they found that the ***levels*** of BP are also positively correlated with LBM. If one does not have a material BP problem (and the vast majority on CRON will not have) then having more LBM than is absolutely necessary presumably does not much matter. But this has now raised my curiosity regarding the relationships, if any, between LBM and other serious health problems, cancer for example (after controlling for BF%, which may be tricky to do because they are fairly well correlated with each other). I wonder if there are any studies that have satisfactorily examined this. Rodney. --- In , " chuinyun " <chuinyun@a...> wrote: > > Greeting Rodney! > > I think you " out to lunch " here! I always sense glee in you when > results go this way with this topic! > > People with more lean muscle get higher BP spike during stress but BP > normalize more quickly than people with more FM. People with more fat > get less BP spike but have more problem normalize BP! Explained > because sodium excretion regulate BP and more fat inhibit sodium > excretion. > > Long Life! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.