Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Blood Electrification current density in the artery

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hello, I have a question to Russ and other knowledgable people here. There is a

man, Forrest - he sells his own version of Beck device (calls it microbe

electrifier) and claims, that it is " improved " version of the original.

His claim is that since Kaali and others measured 100uA of current to be

effective, one needs to apply 130uA to the skin. He intentionally limited the

current in his device and says, that the current applied to the skin equals the

current flowing through the blood (there are almost no losses).

On the other hand Beck said, that in order to achieve 50-100uA in the blood

itself one needs to apply some 3mA to the skin, as there are inevitable losses

in the skin, different layers of tissue and walls of the vessel. So only about

3% goes to the blood.

This is some huge difference!

Who is right then and can this limited-current-130uA-microbe-electrifier be

considered as improved version of original Beck device?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...