Guest guest Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 Hello, I have a question to Russ and other knowledgable people here. There is a man, Forrest - he sells his own version of Beck device (calls it microbe electrifier) and claims, that it is " improved " version of the original. His claim is that since Kaali and others measured 100uA of current to be effective, one needs to apply 130uA to the skin. He intentionally limited the current in his device and says, that the current applied to the skin equals the current flowing through the blood (there are almost no losses). On the other hand Beck said, that in order to achieve 50-100uA in the blood itself one needs to apply some 3mA to the skin, as there are inevitable losses in the skin, different layers of tissue and walls of the vessel. So only about 3% goes to the blood. This is some huge difference! Who is right then and can this limited-current-130uA-microbe-electrifier be considered as improved version of original Beck device? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.