Re: Response to the blood electrifiers unit comparison chart [1 Attachment]

[Guest guest]

No - the higher the frequency (in SOME people's opinion) the less likely it is

getting through the resistance of the skin. 4hz was chosen because at 0 hertz DC

you would simply bore holes through the skin. Beck chose a low enough frequency

to mimic dc and get through the barrier of the skin but high enough to not be

harmful. Yes, there are others like that disagree with this. It is an

amicable but ongoing disagreement:)

>

> Forgive the ignorance but what exactly is the difference between 4hz and 60hz?

The higher the frequency the more juice flowing through? I remember reading some

info on Tesla and he stated extremely high oscillations(not sure if that's the

same thing as frequency) we're safe to the human body and even had a therapeutic

effect of some kind although he didn't get into specifics.

>

>

> Re: Response to the blood electrifiers

unit comparison chart [1 Attachment]

>

>

>

> [Attachment(s) from Forrest included below]

>

> Vicki,

> Transfection at 4Hz is a reality, scientifically proven. (see attached

graph). What percent of the population is easily affected by it is unknown.

Maybe it is very small, maybe not. I sell blood electrifiers that allow 4, 10,

or 40 hertz frequencies so the client can select the frequency that best suits

them. If someone buys a 4Hz-only device and it causes transfection problems for

them then they have to put the device on the shelf and buy another one that has

transfection-free frequencies. I myself am very quickly affected by transfection

and it makes me very sick. I have been electrifying my blood for many years and

still do 2 hours a day. I do it at 40 Hz which is safest and easiest on the

blood. Most people with no experience with the Beck device don't know how to

differentiate between transfection effects and die-off. So your assumption that

everything's OK because of few complaints holds no weight. Most of them are

happy that they are getting " die-off " which proves they are making progress, all

the while what they are really doing is sickening themselves with

transfection-effects and limiting their treatment time which limits their

likelihood of getting over their microbial infection. I would bet that the

percentage of people who give up on blood electrification because of this is

sadly high. Our concern should be more in favor of success with customers than

in upholding the beliefs of the originator. Beck set the first brick down, but

to build a wall you have to place many more bricks upon the founding one.

> If you doubt that higher frequencies are just as effective then use my

plans to make a 60Hz device and use it on yourself the next time you get the

flu. You will see that it works just as well.

>

>

> >To scare people away from 4 hz because of electroporation is not fair

nor accurate because it has not shown itself to be an issue.

>