Re: hard proof

[Guest guest]

>

> Dear Gail

> Thank you for your honest assessment of this issue. That was an

intelligent response to what I consider a reasonable debate on this

matter. Have a great weekend!

> GT 

>

>Hello GT,

You are welcome. I'm not at all bias because I am not selling anything

and can only give you what I have experienced and observed.

Electric medicine works. Doctors know this and use it. For example;

my sister broke her ankle. She went to the hospital; had surgery and

was sent home with an electrical gadget that helped stimulate the bone

to heal. I also had a friend that broke her ankle. They put her in a

cast and said she had to have therapy or she would end up with a stiff

ankle. She could not afford therapy so I lent her my magnetic pulser

which she was able to pulse through her cast and her ankle healed fine

leaving no stiffness in it.

The debate is not in if electric medicine works, rather it lies in to

what degree does it work and does it work to the degree Beck claims it

does. That is where you get into trouble if you use the cure word.

Words are a marvelous way of communicating, but you need to choose your

works carefully. You can say almost the same thing in a different way.

The key word is 'almost'... but not the same. For instance; you could

say, " I'll keep you in my prayers " , which might offend Duncan

<chuckle>, or you could say, " I'll keep you in my thoughts " , which

probably would not offend anybody, or you could say, " I'll send some

positive energy your way. " They're all a little different, but what

they all have in common is they all are saying to the other human

being, they consider them a thing of value worth praying, thinking, or

sending positive energy to. It is the knowledge that somebody else

values them that is what touches them and brings healing. If the

person knows and values themself, they can then also believe they are

worthy of life, health, and all that good stuff. It is delving into

the spirit of things, but also contributing to the physical health of

the person. I have actually seen a person's spirit get so defeated it

gives up and dies before their body does. The body soon follows. The

two are connected.

When it comes to legal issues and cured vrs recovered, they too are two

different things but not exactly alike, with the common demoninator

being health. So you can say, I used the Beck protocl and recovered

from such and such (most will have some improvement in their health

with it) regaining all or most of their health. However, if you say I

cured myself of such and such with the protocol, then in the future you

find yourself sick again with the same thing, chances are you were not

cured.

I do not believe the Beck protocol cures HIV. But even if it can keep

the symptoms at bay (isn't that also what the drugs are suppose to

do?), then it is beneficial to that person.

People need to stay away from the cure word. Many have recovered from

ailments, but also have to continue to use the protocol to maintain

their health. I suspect the protocol keeps the symptoms away, but

doesn't necessarily cure the illness itself. If it was a cure, you

could walk away from the protocol and not have to use it to remain

healthy. Most will continue to use it for the benefits they get from

it.

That's my take on it anyway.

I have also read of people having good results with ozone for HIV, but

again I don't think it's a cure but have been able to get the viral

count down.

Most people have to do a multiple of protocols to regain their health,

with a healthy diet being one of the main things.

Kind regards,

Gail