Re: Better than Beck - DK device

[Guest guest]

Dr. has a machine in his Mexico Clinic. Kazenbach is

trying to get FDA approval for this device and he no longer sells them.

Well, good luck with that one! That should take years of red tape and

needless suffering if it as good as they say it is. It seems that the people

who purchased the rights to the machine do not want to let any information

out.

Here is a post from the Rife List in 1999 and below that are more recent

posts from the Oxyplus List last week. Dotsie

Date: 6/19/99 10:21:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time

From: ygammil1@... (VGammill)

Reply-to: ygammil1@...

rifers@... (Rifers), rife-list@...

List,

I met with , Corina, Max and at the clinic in Tijuana near

the airport. The clinic is quite modest. took me to a site where he

hoped to build a bigger and better clinic in the area. $35,000 for the

land. Personally, I don't think it will fly. I would strongly encourage

him to rent a clinic space near the main border crossing. I did not tell

him this at the time as he seemed very proud and enthusiastic. I just

didn't want to tamper with a man's dream.

He has a good sense of what to charge for therapy. Kazenbach

suggested the prices. I suspect if was setting the prices the way

he'd feel most comfortable, he'd have to plan on missing a few meals.

Corina is also a physician. She apparently has a leiomyosarcoma

metastasis to the lungs. seems to have pretty good control of the

situation with the DK device, but now with the mediastinal involvement I

think he felt some reluctance to crank it up so close to the heart. I can

appreciate this. Although many have used the device without a problem

there is a far greater current density than with any of the Beck or

devices that I've seen.

I tried the device. cranked it up perhaps a third of a treatment

dose before I decided that it was a good time to let go of the copper

handles. It sure made my palms sweat and forearms rigid. The electrodes

are also applied to the feet and again on opposite sides of a tumor mass.

You feel the pulsing of the accoustic range carrier wave. The device is a

pad device in a simple case, maybe a foot square and three inches high. A

couple of wires plug in for the electrodes, a simple rheostat, an on-off

switch with indicator light and that is it.

showed me the lab tests and a video of the fast reduction of a

breast mass in another patient -- all using the DK device.

Kazenbach is the fellow who put this device together to help him

control his HIV. He looks very healthy and has a very ready sense of

humor. It is easy to like someone who laughs at your jokes. I think

had to do a lot of self-censoring of technical discussions because of

agreements with the company that wants to develop the device and the

presence of their technical investigator (Max Lechtman) who sat through the

meeting with pursed lips as I tried to tease out information. I do think

it is a good machine and would want to try it if I had cancer.

If I recall correctly, said that the device delivers up to a

third of an amp. That does seem like a lot. Does anyone know how much

current one can safely use with these types of devices? Hazard info to

follow.

Hazards of Electricity

Electrical Current and the Human Body

The five primary hazards associated with electricity and its use are:

1. Shock. Electric shock occurs when the human body becomes part of a path

through which electrons can flow (i. e., the circuit). The resulting effect

on the body can be either direct or indirect:

•Direct. Injury or death can occur whenever electric current flows through

the human body. Currents of less than 30 milliamps (mA) can result in

death. •Indirect. Although the electric current through the human body may

be well below the values required to cause noticeable injury, human

reaction can result in falls from ladders or scaffolds, or movement into

operating machinery. Such reaction can result in serious injury or death.

There are three basic ways which shock occurs:

•A person comes in contact with both wires of an electric circuit. •A

person comes in contact with a wire from an electric circuit and the ground

source. •A person comes in contact with a ground source and a metal part

that is in contact with a wire from an electric circuit.

2. Burns. Burns can result when a person touches electrical wiring or

equipment that is improperly used or maintained. Typically, such burn

injuries occur on the hands.

3. Arc-Blast. Arc-blasts occur from high-amperage currents arcing through

air. This abnormal current flow (arc-blast) is initiated by contact between

two energized points. This contact can be caused by persons who have an

accident while working on energized components, or by equipment failure due

to fatigue or abuse. Temperatures as high as 35,000 o F have been recorded

in arc- blast research. The three primary hazards associated with an

arc-blast are:

•Thermal Radiation. In most cases, the radiated thermal energy is only part

of the total energy available from the arc. Numerous factors, including

skin color, area of skin exposed, type of clothing have an effect on degree

of injury. Proper clothing, work distances, and overcurrent protection can

improve the chances of curable burns. •Pressure Wave. A high- energy arcing

fault can produce a considerable pressure wave. Research has shown that a

person 2 feet away from a 25,000 amp arc would experience a force of

approximately 480 pounds on the front of their body. In addition, such a

pressure wave can cause serious ear damage and memory loss due to mild

concussions. In some instances, the pressure wave may propel the victim

away from the arc- blast, reducing the exposure to the thermal energy.

However, such rapid movement could also cause serious physical injury.

•Projectiles. The pressure wave can propel relatively large objects over a

considerable distance. In some cases, the pressure wave has sufficient

force to snap the heads of 3/ 8- inch steel bolts and knock over ordinary

construction walls.

The high- energy arc also causes many of the copper and aluminum components

in the electrical equipment to become molten. These " droplets " of molten

metal can be propelled great distances by the pressure wave. Although these

droplets cool rapidly, they can still be above temperatures capable of

causing serious burns or igniting ordinary clothing at distances of 10 feet

or more. In many cases, the burning effect is much worse than the injury

from shrapnel effects of the droplets.

4. Explosions. Explosions occur when electricity provides a source of

ignition for an explosive mixture in the atmosphere. Explosive atmospheres

can result from the accumulation of flammable vapors or gases generated by

nearby sources and processes. Ignition can be due to overheated conductors

or equipment, or normal arcing (sparking) at switch contacts. OSHA

standards, the National Electrical Code and related safety standards have

precise requirements for electrical systems and equipment when applied in

such areas.

5.Fires. Electricity is one of the most common causes of fire both in the

home and workplace. Defective or misused electrical equipment is a major

cause, with high resistance connections being one of the primary sources of

ignition. High resistance connections occur where wires are improperly

spliced or connected to other components such as receptacle outlets and

switches. This was the primary cause of fires associated with the use of

aluminum wire in buildings during the 1960s and 1970s.

The Effects of Shock on the Human Body

The effects of electric shock on the human body depend on several factors.

The major factors are:

•Current and Voltage •Resistance •Path through body •Duration of shock

The muscular structure of the body is also a factor in that people having

less muscle tissue typically show similar effects at lesser current levels.

Current and Voltage

Although high voltage often produces massive destruction of tissue at

contact locations, it is generally believed that the detrimental effects of

electric shock are due to the current actually flowing through the body.

Even though Ohm's law (I= V/ R) applies, it is often difficult to correlate

voltage with damage to the body because of the large variations in contact

resistance usually present in accidents. Any electrical device used on a

house wiring circuit can, under certain conditions, transmit a fatal

current. Although currents greater than 10 mA are capable of producing

painful to severe shock, currents between 100 and 200 mA can be lethal.

Table 1 provides the effects of electricity on the body for different

current levels.

With increasing alternating current, the sensations of tingling give way to

contractions of the muscles. The muscular contractions and accompanying

sensations of heat increase as the current is increased. Sensations of pain

develop, and voluntary control of the muscles that lie in the current

pathway becomes increasingly difficult. As current approaches 15 mA, the

victim cannot let go of the conductive surface being grasped. At this

point, the individual is said to " freeze " the circuit. This is frequently

referred to as the " let- go " threshold.

As current approaches 100 mA, ventricular fibrillation of the heart occurs.

Ventricular fibrillation is defined as " very rapid uncoordinated

contractions of the ventricles of the heart resulting in loss of

synchronization between heartbeat and pulse beat. " Once ventricular

fibrillation occurs, it will continue and death will ensue within a few

minutes. Use of a special device called a de- fibrillator is required to

save the victim.

Heavy current flow can result in severe burns and heart paralysis. If shock

is of short duration, the heart stops during current passage and usually

re- starts normally on current interruption, improving the victim's chances

for survival.

Resistance

Studies have shown that the electrical resistance of the human body varies

with the amount of moisture on the skin, the pressure applied to the

contact point, and the contact area.

The outer layer of skin, the epidermis, has very high resistance when dry.

Wet conditions, a cut or other break in the skin will drastically reduce

resistance.

Shock severity increases with an increase in pressure of contact. Also, the

larger the contact area, the lower the resistance.

Whatever protection is offered by skin resistance decreases rapidly with

increase in voltage. Higher voltages have the capability of " breaking down "

the outer layers of the skin, thereby reducing the resistance.

Path Through Body

The path the current takes through the body affects the degree of injury. A

small current that passes from one extremity through the heart to the other

extremity is capable of causing severe injury or electrocution. There have

been many cases where an arm or leg was severely burned to the point of

detachment when the extremity came in contact with electrical current and

the current flowed through a portion of the limb before it went out into

the other conductor without going through the trunk of the body. Had the

current gone through the trunk of the body, the person would almost surely

have been electrocuted.

A large number of serious electrical accidents in industry involve current

flow from hands to feet. Such a path involves both the heart and the lungs.

This type of shock can be fatal.

Duration of Shock

The duration of the shock has a great bearing on the final outcome. If the

shock is of short duration, it may only be a painful experience for the

person.

If the level of current flow reaches the approximate ventricular

fibrillation threshold of 100 mA, a shock duration of a few seconds could

be fatal. This is not much current when you consider that a small light

duty portable electric drill draws about 30 times as much.

At relatively high currents, death is inevitable if the shock is of

appreciable duration; however, if the shock is of short duration, and if

the heart has not been damaged, a normal heartbeat pattern may resume after

contact with the electrical current is interrupted.

Summary of Effects

We can sum up the lethal effects of electric current as follows:

•Current flow greater than the " let go " threshold of an individual may

cause a person to collapse, become unconscious and can result in death. The

current flow would most often have to continue for longer than five

seconds. Although it may not be possible to determine the exact cause of

death with certainty, asphyxiation, or heart failure are the prime

suspects. •Current flow through the chest, neck, head, or major centers

controlling respiration may result in a failure of the respiratory system.

This is usually caused by a disruption of the nerve impulses between the

respiratory control center and the respiratory muscles. Such a condition is

dangerous since it is possible for the respiratory failure to continue even

after the current flow has stopped. •The most dangerous condition can occur

when fairly small amounts of current flow through the heart area. Such

current flow can cause ventricular fibrillation. This asynchronous movement

of the heart causes the hearts' usual rhythmic pumping action to cease.

Death results within minutes. •When relatively large currents flow through

the heart area, heart action may be stopped entirely. If the shock duration

is short and no physical damage to the heart has occurred, the heart may

begin rhythmic pumping automatically when the current ceases to flow.

•Extensive tissue damage, including internal organ damage due to high

temperatures, occurs when very large currents flow through major portions

of the body.

There are recorded cases of delayed death after a person has been revived

following an electrical shock. This may occur within minutes, hours, or

even days after the event has occurred. Several assumptions for such

delayed effects are:

•Internal or unseen hemorrhaging •Emotional or physical effects of shock

•Aggravation of a pre- existing condition

In many accidents, there is a combination of the above effects, or

additional effects may develop after the initial accident, thus making an

accurate diagnosis quite difficult.

From Oxyplus List 7/2/01:

The web page was shut down due to requirements from the Licensor. They do

not want to let know about this apparatus till get approved by the FDA.

I cannot report because I signed a non-disclosure agreement with D.K. and

the licensors, but quickly you will know about this machine.

Right now we have a patient with the prognosis from Neurologist " He never

will move a finger "

After 2 ozone treatments, plus the Kanzenbach machine he was able to:

Control sphincters (before no control of stools and urine)

Move fingers, arms and hands in a coordinated manner with fine and coarse

movements.

" Talk " as a little child, but letting us to understand what he needs or

thinks.

See the light and surroundings

Hear our voices (before was deaf)

With help go out of the wheelchair and walk with crutches (under our

supervision)

The protocol:

Every other day: Use of the D.K. machine on arms and legs (thirteen minutes

total) Ozone I.V. 50 c.c.

M.D.

[Guest guest]

Thanks for mentioning the name of Dr. . Because of that, I was

able to track down a website of his last night which was updated just

last month. Most of the website is in spanish but here is his one

english page:

http://www.geocities.com/compu_dr/nueve/fondos_eng.htm

I also had the spanish text from his other pages translated and for

anyone interested, I have put that translation onto a webpage here:

http://edvt.50g.com/dk.html

Kanzenbach wrote to me in April of last year and said he was

looking forward to making a presentation of his device and case

studies at a world AIDS conference in Europe that June. Since that

event, I have written him but no longer get replies.

> Dr. has a machine in his Mexico Clinic. Kazenbach

is

> trying to get FDA approval for this device and he no longer sells

them.

> Well, good luck with that one! That should take years of red tape

and

> needless suffering if it as good as they say it is. It seems that

the people

> who purchased the rights to the machine do not want to let any

information

> out.

[Guest guest]

is in Africa running a trial with his device.

Regards

Noel

Please request a 'Read Receipt' to ensure that I receive your Email.

Prof. Noel P O Box 137 Parkville VIC 3052 Australia

Phone 03 9639 6090 International 613 9639 6090

Mobile 0412 994 001 International 61 412 994 001

Fax 03 9639 6392 International 613 9639 6392

Email noelc@... Web: http://smile.org.au

Sapere Aude: Dare to be wise.

Dare to care: Clinton.

All truth goes through three stages: first it is ridiculed: then it is

violently opposed: finally it is accepted as self evident. Schopenhauer.

Genius is the ability to look at what others have looked at, and see what

they have not seen. Szyent-Gyorgy.

Effort only fully releases its reward after a person refuses to quit.

Re: Better than Beck - DK device

Thanks for mentioning the name of Dr. . Because of that, I was

able to track down a website of his last night which was updated just

last month. Most of the website is in spanish but here is his one

english page:

http://www.geocities.com/compu_dr/nueve/fondos_eng.htm

I also had the spanish text from his other pages translated and for

anyone interested, I have put that translation onto a webpage here:

http://edvt.50g.com/dk.html

Kanzenbach wrote to me in April of last year and said he was

looking forward to making a presentation of his device and case

studies at a world AIDS conference in Europe that June. Since that

event, I have written him but no longer get replies.

> Dr. has a machine in his Mexico Clinic. Kazenbach

is

> trying to get FDA approval for this device and he no longer sells

them.

> Well, good luck with that one! That should take years of red tape

and

> needless suffering if it as good as they say it is. It seems that

the people

> who purchased the rights to the machine do not want to let any

information

> out.

[Guest guest]

Dear List

After having read about the Kazenbach Device,

I am curious about the output performances of the device.

There are a few little hints. Could I invite the list members to speculate

a little further ?

What frequency he might use ?

What Wave forms ?

Power output ?

Duration of treatment ?

Negative health effects, if any ?

Cheers Klaus

Snip

>there is a far greater current density than with any of the Beck or

>devices that I've seen.

> I tried the device. cranked it up perhaps a third of a treatment

>dose before I decided that it was a good time to let go of the copper

>handles. It sure made my palms sweat and forearms rigid. The electrodes

>are also applied to the feet and again on opposite sides of a tumor mass.

>You feel the pulsing of the accoustic range carrier wave. The device is a

>pad device in a simple case, maybe a foot square and three inches high. A

>couple of wires plug in for the electrodes, a simple rheostat, an on-off

>switch with indicator light and that is it.

Snip

> If I recall correctly, said that the device delivers up to a

>third of an amp. That does seem like a lot. Does anyone know how much

>current one can safely use with these types of devices? Hazard info to

>follow.

Snip

[Guest guest]

Dear Klaus,

Kanzenbach's design is proprietary and is currently being evaluated by

in Africa, my research group in Melbourne Australia and in

Mexico.

It is foolish to speculate on its output etc..A third of an amp is rubbish.

The research is not yet complete but I can tell you that it does have

beneficial effects for some HIV patients and some cancer patients.

You will have to wait until the research is complete so that it can be

published.

Regards

Noel

Please request a 'Read Receipt' to ensure that I receive your Email.

Prof. Noel P O Box 137 Parkville VIC 3052 Australia

Phone 03 9639 6090 International 613 9639 6090

Mobile 0412 994 001 International 61 412 994 001

Fax 03 9639 6392 International 613 9639 6392

Email noelc@... Web: http://smile.org.au

Sapere Aude: Dare to be wise.

Dare to care: Clinton.

All truth goes through three stages: first it is ridiculed: then it is

violently opposed: finally it is accepted as self evident. Schopenhauer.

Genius is the ability to look at what others have looked at, and see what

they have not seen. Szyent-Gyorgy.

Effort only fully releases its reward after a person refuses to quit.

Re: Better than Beck - DK device

Dear List

After having read about the Kazenbach Device,

I am curious about the output performances of the device.

There are a few little hints. Could I invite the list members to speculate

a little further ?

What frequency he might use ?

What Wave forms ?

Power output ?

Duration of treatment ?

Negative health effects, if any ?

Cheers Klaus

Snip

>there is a far greater current density than with any of the Beck or

>devices that I've seen.

> I tried the device. cranked it up perhaps a third of a treatment

>dose before I decided that it was a good time to let go of the copper

>handles. It sure made my palms sweat and forearms rigid. The electrodes

>are also applied to the feet and again on opposite sides of a tumor mass.

>You feel the pulsing of the accoustic range carrier wave. The device is a

>pad device in a simple case, maybe a foot square and three inches high. A

>couple of wires plug in for the electrodes, a simple rheostat, an on-off

>switch with indicator light and that is it.

Snip

> If I recall correctly, said that the device delivers up to a

>third of an amp. That does seem like a lot. Does anyone know how much

>current one can safely use with these types of devices? Hazard info to

>follow.

Snip

[Guest guest]

Dear Dotsie and List

Many thanks for your excellent article research, it is good to know where

to look.

There is lots of very interesting and helpful information in the last

article you put on the list.

So I tried also to look up Kanzenbach's patent on the device, but I

have to admit, that my search capabilities are not nearly as good as yours

and ended in the negative.

Cheers Klaus

At 22:41 9/07/01 -0400, you wrote:

>From: http://www.mindspring.com/~turf/alt/elec/becklike.txt

>

>The following article is by Kanzenbach

>(aidsbusters@...) and describes the device he

>invented which is a pad generator that can transmit variable

>carrier (up to RF) signals modulated by DC.

>

>In Vivo Pulsed High Potential HIV Electrotherapy

>

>Pulsed high potential HIV electrotherapy technology appears to be an

>effective method for the treatment of HIV disease, reducing viral load

>to low levels and significantly improving the immune panel in

>preliminary experimental trials conducted over the past 30 months.

>Reductions of viral load by as much as 97.6%, from 369,000 to 9,800,

>and CD-4 count increases of as much as 600%, from 224 to 1410 have

>been reported in the absence of HIV pharmaceuticals in preliminary

>human clinical case studies.

>

>Pre and post treatment Immune panel and viral load by PCR reports, and

>the signed statements of Doctors, patients, and health care

>professionals confirming these results are available for review

>subject to the execution of a confidentiality agreement.

>

>This technology appears to be nearly as effective in its present form

>as any Protease inhibitor and Nucleoside analog combination drug

>therapy available at a small fraction of the cost and without

>significant side effects, and it is my belief that it can be improved

>further, perhaps significantly.

>

>It is therefore a potentially universal treatment for HIV disease and

>AIDS.

>

>The use of momentary high potentials breaks the skin dielectric and

>allows significant potentials to impact the tissues and accumulate in

>the body.

>

>Pulsed high potential electrotherapy is thought to denature and

>disrupt the fragile gp120 and gp41 receptor proteins found on the

>surface of the HIV virion, disabling the gp41 mechanism and thereby

>inhibiting the ability of the virus to infect CD4 cells in vivo.

>

>In addition, high potential electrotherapy is thought to rupture

>infected cells having weakened cell membranes expressing virus, and

>may prevent the formation of synctia.

>

>These effects are believed to be due to the electromechanical and

>electrostatic stresses induced by high voltage pulses at multiple

>audio and radio frequencies, as well as by one or more electrochemical

>reactions.

>One hypothesis upon which the development of this technology is based

>concerning the structure and action of the viral receptor proteins has

>been confirmed in the recently published article, " Core Structure of

>gp41 from the HIV Envelope Glycoprotein; " Cell; vol. 89, pp. 263-273,

>April 18, 1997, in that the co-receptor is in the form of a trimer

>spiral under tension and having an hydrophobic tip to act as a lipid

>harpoon.

>

>It has already been established that exposure to low potential

>currents of low power will significantly inhibit the ability of HIV to

>infect CD4 cells in vitro, (Science News, March 30, 1991, p. 207).,

>U.S. Patent of Kaali, #5,188,738.

>

>The electromechanical stresses, cell electroporation, and ion exchange

>processes induced by high voltage DC pulses are well documented in

>vitro and may serve both to destroy infected cells and to stimulate

>the immune system, (G. and J. Wolfe; Electromechanical Stresses

>Produced in the Plasma Membranes of Suspended Cells by Applied

>Electric Fields (1987); J. Membrane Biol.; vol. 96; pp. 129-139; D.C.

>Chang; Cell poration and cell fusion using an oscillating electric

>field; Oct. 1989; Biophys. J.; vol. 56; pp. 641-652; L. Dao-Sheng,

>R.D. Astumian, and T.Y. Tsong; Activation of Na and K Pumping Modes

>(Na, K)--ATPase by an Oscillating Electric Field; 1990; J. Biol. Chem.

>vol.265; pp. 7260-7267; D.S. Dimitrov and A.E. Sowers; 1990; Membrane

>Electroporation - Fast Molecular Exchange by Electroosmosis; Biophys.

>Act; vol. 1022; pp. 381-392).

>

>The action of in vivo high potential HIV electrotherapy appears to

>penetrate the soft tissues as well as the blood, targeting the

>principal reservoirs of infection in the lymphatic system.

>

>This advanced electrotherapy is painless if not comfortable for all

>persons, non-invasive, and appears to be well tolerated and without

>toxic side effects or the potential for the rapid development of

>resistant mutational strains of HIV.

>

>It should be noted that all current FDA approved pharmaceutical

>industry HIV drug therapies only inhibit the ability of the HIV virus

>to replicate once it has infected the cell.

>

>An informal clinical trial has been concluded by the Director of a

>holistic medical clinic in Newport Beach, California with extensive

>experience in the treatment of HIV disease and AIDS.

>

>In this trial no persons suffered ill effects from the use of this

>type of device.

>

>In the initial reduced power safety trial of 7 - 5 minute sessions

>delivered over 2 weeks, 3 of 4 persons reported some improvement in

>their subsequent immune panel and a reduction in their viral load.

>with 2 persons achieving a 50% or greater reduction.

>

>In a subsequent trial with the current generation of device

>3 of 3 persons reported significant increases in CD-4 cells and a an

>average viral load reduction of greater than 1 log, with 1 person

>acheiving nearly a 2 log reduction in viral load as measured by PCR.

>

>The design and development of this technology is sufficiently advanced

>to be production ready in its present form, although certain

>improvements may be rapidly incorporated into the design with further

>human trials.

>

>A search of the AIDS patent database has shown this technology to be

>both unique and patentable. A Patent application has been submitted

>to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and a U.S. Patent is now

>pending.

>

>The application of this advanced electrotheraputic technology for the

>treatment of HIV and AIDS throughout the World may represent a

>significant advance in medicine. In addition to trreating HIV and

>AIDS, this form of high Voltage therapy may have other important

>applications as well:

>

>One of the foremost concerns in medicine today is the emergence of

>antibiotic resistant strains of bacterial microbes, and this

>technology has been demonstrated anecdotally to be effective therapy

>for an H.Pylori infection, (i.e. a duodenal ulcer), as well as

>resolving a chronic fungal infection in the muscle tissue of an AIDS

>patient.

>

>Exposure to the forces produced by pulsed high voltage electrotherapy

>at multiple frequencies appears to inactivate disease causing

>microorganisms in vivo. Inactivation and destruction of bacterial

>microorganisms by elecric means is well established in vitro, (M.

> and K. Soike; Sterilization by Electrohydraulic Treatment; Oct.

>1966; Science; pp. 155-157; W.A. Hamilton, and A.J.H. Sale; Effects of

>High Electric Fields on Microorganisms II. Mechanism and Action of the

>Lethal Effect; 1967; Biochem. Biophys. Acta. vol. 148; pp. 789-800;

>S.E. Gillibrand and M.L. Speck; Inactivation of Microorganisms by

>Electrohydraulic Shock; 1967a; Appl. Microbiol.; vol. 15(5); pp.

>1038-1044; T. Grahl, W. Sitzmann, and H. Markl; 102; Killing of

>microorganisms in fluid media by high-voltage pulses; Presented at the

>10th Dechema Biotechnol. Conference Series 5B; pp. 675-678).

>

>The equipment which has been developed thus far is robust, inexpensive

>to produce, and portable. For HIV treatment, the high voltage pulsed

>DC output is applied directly to the patient's body at the hands,

>feet, thymus, and major lymph nodes through two Copper electrodes,

>with one electrode being the high voltage output and the other being

>held at ground potential. Approximately 60 to 90 minutes of exposure

>distributed over from 5 to14 treatment sessions over a period of one

>to two weeks are required, with results becoming apparent in the

>majority of test subjects within 30 to 60 days after the cessation of

>treatment.

>

>In summation, the human body is an electrochemical machine of great

>complexity. Cellular activity and mortality as well as pathogen

>deactivation in response to electric fields is scientifically

>established in vitro. Changes of tens of millivolts in transmembrane

>potentials can stimulate cell mitosis, cause the electroporation of

>cell membranes, and rupture damaged cells. FDA approved magnetic pulse

>diathermy and low voltage current devices exist which accelerate

>healing by these means. Diapulse, and 's bone growth

>stimulator, and the Israeli Armament Industries electrolytic cell

>wound dressing, are examples of these types of devices.

>

>As the body acts as a distributed resistive capacitive network, a

>charge is allowed to build and be sustained in the blood and tissues

>by waveforms and frequencies suited both to the human physiology and

>the demands of the high Voltage antiresonant output circuit. A middle

>audio frequency is employed at a burst rate allowing the greatest

>charge to accumulate in the output coil without allowing the charge to

>dissipate from the body completely between bursts. These bursts also

>stimulate the nerves and muscles, aiding in lymphatic flow and

>stimulating the release of glandular secretions and neurotransmitters

>believed to have a beneficial theraputic effect. The average energy

>output of this device is well within the range known to be safe, and

>the sensation is not unlike that of an FDA approved TENS type

>stimulator, currently in wide use in the United States and Europe.

>

>Additional switching at a low radio frequency is believed to generate

>a magnetic resonance in the blood. This action is not unlike inductive

>field healing technology, typically referred to as radio or magnetic

>pulse diathermy, that is FDA approved and currently in wide use in the

>United States and Europe. This type of holistic device dates back to

> Lakhovsky and a high peak power version is currently being

>investigated under an IDE by a Professor P.T. Pappas of Greece.

>

>An investigational high potential pulsed electrotheraputic device

>incorporating the effects described can be provided at no cost for

>evaluation by interested health care professionals or research

>organizations wishing to verify our results, as well as interested

>governments, or prospective licensees, distributors, or buyers,

>subject to the execution of a confidential disclosure and limited use

>agreement providing for the public disclosure of clinical data which

>may be acquired during the course of the evaluation.

>

>

>Summary of Cases:

>

>These are all of the results so far produced by the latest production

>ready variant, which I am calling a Holistic Electrotheraputic Device:

>

>Case A

>36 year old white male

>HIV positive since 1985

>Previous antiretroviral use

>

>Before round of electrical therapy:

>CD-4: 224

>Viral load: 38,503

>After round of electrical therapy

>60 minutes of exposure over a period of one week

>CD-4: 1405

>Viral load by ultrasensitive: 4,020

>

>Case B

>48 year old white male

>HIV positive since 1984

>AIDS diagnosis since 1997

>No previous antiretroviral use

>

>Before round of electrical therapy:

>CD-4:140

>Viral load: 369,154

>After round of electrical therapy:

>90 minutes of exposure over a period of 10 days

>70 days post treatment:

>CD-4: 263

>Viral load: 9,862

>115 days post treatment:

>CD-4: 140

>Viral load: 323,042

>

>Case C

>31 year old white male

>HIV positive since 1991

>No previous antiretroviral use

>Before round of electrical therapy:

>CD-4: 501

>Viral load by PCR: 13,500

>After round of electrical therapy:

>75 minutes of exposure over a period of 10 days

>55 days post treatment:

>CD-4: 787

>Viral load by PCR: 733

>

>Efficacy: 100% of test subjects

>

>Conclusion:

>To a reasonable mind interested in the greater good, this would seem

>to warrant further investigation.

>

>I have been using this device exclusively for 30 months to treat my

>own HIV infection with no ill effects.

>

>Sincerely,

>

> Kanzenbach

>aidsbusters@...

>

>In The United States Patent and Trademark Office:

>

>Holistic Electrotheraputic Device for Treating HIV and Other Diseases

>

>It has been established in biochemical science and through

>the prior art that electric and magnetic fields can influence the

>electrochemistry of cells and deactivate pathogens such as bacteria

>and viruses.

>

>An electrotheraputic device is described suitable for treating HIV and

>other diseases in the human body by means of high potential DC

>electric impulses delivered to the body at two or more frequencies, as

>depicted in Figures 1 and 2.

>

>Fig. 1 represents a practical circuit which is a currently preferred

>configuration.

>

>Fig. 2 represents various means of achieving enhanced effects.

>

>In the invention, one or more oscillators are configured to produce a

>varying DC signal having the desired wave form, duty cycles, and range

>of frequencies, generally an audio frequency of from 100-1000 cps with

>an optional carrier and sub carrier of from 8 kc to 2 mc delivered

>through filter and logic gating means to a high speed semiconductor

>amplifier or switch such as a power MOSFET, at generally from 1 to 48

>impulses per second.

>

>Such modulation may be produced by an array of dividers, counters, and

>logic gates from one or more fixed or variable oscillators as depicted

>in Figs. 1 and 2.

>

>A sine wave generator and voltage controlled oscillator may be

>employed to provide a frequency modulation effect, as shown in Fig. 2.

>

>Outputs from an oscillator may also be delivered to a timed pulse

>generator, a function generator and mixer circuit, and a gated

>amplifier to produce an optimal wave form for the demands of the

>transformer and the distributed RC network of the body, and therefore

>most suitable for electrotheraputic application, as shown in Fig. 2.

>This modulation at a plurality of frequencies is configured to drive

>the primary windings of one or more transformers of high potential

>secondary output at the desired frequencies and duty cycles of DC

>impulses.

>

>The high potential secondary output impulses are introduced into the

>body through two or more output electrodes in contact with, or in

>close proximity to the surface of the skin. These impulses and the

>currents and potentials which flow through and accumulate in the body

>are believed to act upon the cellular and viral electrochemistry, also

>producing beneficial systemic effects such as nervous stimulation and

>muscular contractions.

>

>A current limiting device such as a potentiometer or rheostat is

>generally employed in series with a diode to control available current

>to the primary coil of the transformer, as shown in Figs. 1 and 2.

>

>Voltage and current control means such as a transistor regulator may

>also be employed where desirable to regulate the Voltage and current

>to the primary coil of the transformer.

>

>A half or full bridge driver circuit may also be employed to drive the

>primary coil of the transformer.

>

>High Voltage output may be directed to a spark gap or discharge tube

>when desirable as shown in Fig. 2.

>

>Digital logic such as AND or NAND gating having two or more inputs may

>be employed to drive a transistor switch directly, as shown in Fig. 1.

>This transistor, an N-channel enhancement mode MOSFET, switches

>current to ground through the primary coil of a suitable high Voltage

>transformer, such as an automotive ignition coil.

>

>Beneficial effects which are increases in CD-4 cell counts, reductions

>in viral load and the reduction of chronic infection are generally

>proportional to exposure time, number of treatments, and delivered

>output power.

>

>

>

>

>