Guest guest Posted March 12, 2010 Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 Actually, Beck knew this, and hence the Magnetic Pulser. I have seen/heard him talk about the HIV virus living and surviving in the gut on the videos that are on youtube. > > This damnable virus has made lives miserable and short. It has persisted despite throwing stuff at it that should have killed it off long ago. > > But the virus is in places you cannot easily reach with either Beck's or completely with meds. New meds are currently underway to address this problem of entering the gut linings. If these new meds can be so designed it may mark the beginning of the end for HIV, and we might expect complete remissions from it in large numbers of cases. > > The reason they have not focused on this earlier was that HIV was not assumed to live in the gut, just the blood and lymph. Even Beck fell for that assumption. Had he lived past Dec 2006, he would have seen this too, and perhaps been able to come up with some sort of trick to attack the virus with a new protocol. > > The treatments, both alt and mainst, have been failing, not because they could not reduce the virus, but they were aimed at the wrong target area in the body. Electricity and meds will both slaughter the virus in a test tube, where we can isolate the virus. But in the body we were shooting at the house while the virus was in the barn all along. > > Al Capone was by trade a book keeper. He said, " The profit on booze, by the time you pay everyone off, is less than on milk. I tell you we've been in the wrong business right from the start! " In like manner, we have been treating blood while missing most of the HIV. > > 90 percent or more of the virus lives in the gut linings. It can mutate and the mutated strains get into bloodstream, and that is what you see in the viral load numbers. But the mother lode, the matrix, the stash of HIV is in the gut linings, protected by the body's own defensive shields. This highly concentrated and deadly deposit of virus is extremely delicate. It cannot live in blood or anywhere else. It must mutate first, then it can travel. Once it enters blood, the immune system makes antibodies for it, and attacks it. So it can rise and fall in blood readings. The viral load count is one way to tell how active the virus is and will be, as it measures the mutation, and hence the strength of the underlying HIV in gut. Physicians prior to Dec 2006 did not know all this. All they knew was historical data that says if your viral load is 100,000 you can be expected to lose 50-100 CD4 per year. It was just a correlation, not any understanding of the actual causation. > > So..if I had HIV I'd throw everything I could at it, in hopes of reaching some of it in the gut. Better drugs that do this with less side effects are coming, I would predict. Meanwhile the Cd4 is what to watch since viral load is only one indicator, while Cd4 is immunity itself. > > bG > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2010 Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 the pulser will not work for that. it may help remove from lymph nodes and into the lymphatic system for disposal, that's about it. the pulser is nowhere near enough current induced to disable the virus. sometimes someone reports their viral load drops with an MRI which is huge and might induce enough current to disable a lot of HIV in whole body. We could try a head to foot battery solution to do same thing over a longer period with less disruption, but no one to try it on. bG > > > > This damnable virus has made lives miserable and short. It has persisted despite throwing stuff at it that should have killed it off long ago. > > > > But the virus is in places you cannot easily reach with either Beck's or completely with meds. New meds are currently underway to address this problem of entering the gut linings. If these new meds can be so designed it may mark the beginning of the end for HIV, and we might expect complete remissions from it in large numbers of cases. > > > > The reason they have not focused on this earlier was that HIV was not assumed to live in the gut, just the blood and lymph. Even Beck fell for that assumption. Had he lived past Dec 2006, he would have seen this too, and perhaps been able to come up with some sort of trick to attack the virus with a new protocol. > > > > The treatments, both alt and mainst, have been failing, not because they could not reduce the virus, but they were aimed at the wrong target area in the body. Electricity and meds will both slaughter the virus in a test tube, where we can isolate the virus. But in the body we were shooting at the house while the virus was in the barn all along. > > > > Al Capone was by trade a book keeper. He said, " The profit on booze, by the time you pay everyone off, is less than on milk. I tell you we've been in the wrong business right from the start! " In like manner, we have been treating blood while missing most of the HIV. > > > > 90 percent or more of the virus lives in the gut linings. It can mutate and the mutated strains get into bloodstream, and that is what you see in the viral load numbers. But the mother lode, the matrix, the stash of HIV is in the gut linings, protected by the body's own defensive shields. This highly concentrated and deadly deposit of virus is extremely delicate. It cannot live in blood or anywhere else. It must mutate first, then it can travel. Once it enters blood, the immune system makes antibodies for it, and attacks it. So it can rise and fall in blood readings. The viral load count is one way to tell how active the virus is and will be, as it measures the mutation, and hence the strength of the underlying HIV in gut. Physicians prior to Dec 2006 did not know all this. All they knew was historical data that says if your viral load is 100,000 you can be expected to lose 50-100 CD4 per year. It was just a correlation, not any understanding of the actual causation. > > > > So..if I had HIV I'd throw everything I could at it, in hopes of reaching some of it in the gut. Better drugs that do this with less side effects are coming, I would predict. Meanwhile the Cd4 is what to watch since viral load is only one indicator, while Cd4 is immunity itself. > > > > bG > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2010 Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 there's a group called " magpulser " that sells giant ones that use two car batteries, and are for Lyme's disease. That would be about the only one I've seen might help... bG > > > > > > This damnable virus has made lives miserable and short. It has persisted despite throwing stuff at it that should have killed it off long ago. > > > > > > But the virus is in places you cannot easily reach with either Beck's or completely with meds. New meds are currently underway to address this problem of entering the gut linings. If these new meds can be so designed it may mark the beginning of the end for HIV, and we might expect complete remissions from it in large numbers of cases. > > > > > > The reason they have not focused on this earlier was that HIV was not assumed to live in the gut, just the blood and lymph. Even Beck fell for that assumption. Had he lived past Dec 2006, he would have seen this too, and perhaps been able to come up with some sort of trick to attack the virus with a new protocol. > > > > > > The treatments, both alt and mainst, have been failing, not because they could not reduce the virus, but they were aimed at the wrong target area in the body. Electricity and meds will both slaughter the virus in a test tube, where we can isolate the virus. But in the body we were shooting at the house while the virus was in the barn all along. > > > > > > Al Capone was by trade a book keeper. He said, " The profit on booze, by the time you pay everyone off, is less than on milk. I tell you we've been in the wrong business right from the start! " In like manner, we have been treating blood while missing most of the HIV. > > > > > > 90 percent or more of the virus lives in the gut linings. It can mutate and the mutated strains get into bloodstream, and that is what you see in the viral load numbers. But the mother lode, the matrix, the stash of HIV is in the gut linings, protected by the body's own defensive shields. This highly concentrated and deadly deposit of virus is extremely delicate. It cannot live in blood or anywhere else. It must mutate first, then it can travel. Once it enters blood, the immune system makes antibodies for it, and attacks it. So it can rise and fall in blood readings. The viral load count is one way to tell how active the virus is and will be, as it measures the mutation, and hence the strength of the underlying HIV in gut. Physicians prior to Dec 2006 did not know all this. All they knew was historical data that says if your viral load is 100,000 you can be expected to lose 50-100 CD4 per year. It was just a correlation, not any understanding of the actual causation. > > > > > > So..if I had HIV I'd throw everything I could at it, in hopes of reaching some of it in the gut. Better drugs that do this with less side effects are coming, I would predict. Meanwhile the Cd4 is what to watch since viral load is only one indicator, while Cd4 is immunity itself. > > > > > > bG > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2010 Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 i would volonteer for this protocol... are you willing to administer? you could be on to something here... another thing you don't mention much about is the virus in the brain... it does seep and cause severe damage there... let me know your thoughts. From: Baby_grand <bobluhrs@...>Subject: Re: HIV thoughts Date: Friday, March 12, 2010, 6:19 PM there's a group called "magpulser" that sells giant ones that use two car batteries, and are for Lyme's disease. That would be about the only one I've seen might help...bG> > >> > > This damnable virus has made lives miserable and short. It has persisted despite throwing stuff at it that should have killed it off long ago.> > > > > > But the virus is in places you cannot easily reach with either Beck's or completely with meds. New meds are currently underway to address this problem of entering the gut linings. If these new meds can be so designed it may mark the beginning of the end for HIV, and we might expect complete remissions from it in large numbers of cases.> > > > > > The reason they have not focused on this earlier was that HIV was not assumed to live in the gut, just the blood and lymph. Even Beck fell for that assumption. Had he lived past Dec 2006, he would have seen this too, and perhaps been able to come up with some sort of trick to attack the virus with a new protocol.> > > > > > The treatments, both alt and mainst, have been failing, not because they could not reduce the virus, but they were aimed at the wrong target area in the body. Electricity and meds will both slaughter the virus in a test tube, where we can isolate the virus. But in the body we were shooting at the house while the virus was in the barn all along. > > > > > > Al Capone was by trade a book keeper. He said, "The profit on booze, by the time you pay everyone off, is less than on milk. I tell you we've been in the wrong business right from the start!" In like manner, we have been treating blood while missing most of the HIV.> > > > > > 90 percent or more of the virus lives in the gut linings. It can mutate and the mutated strains get into bloodstream, and that is what you see in the viral load numbers. But the mother lode, the matrix, the stash of HIV is in the gut linings, protected by the body's own defensive shields. This highly concentrated and deadly deposit of virus is extremely delicate. It cannot live in blood or anywhere else. It must mutate first, then it can travel. Once it enters blood, the immune system makes antibodies for it, and attacks it. So it can rise and fall in blood readings. The viral load count is one way to tell how active the virus is and will be, as it measures the mutation, and hence the strength of the underlying HIV in gut. Physicians prior to Dec 2006 did not know all this. All they knew was historical data that says if your viral load is 100,000 you can be expected to lose 50-100 CD4 per year. It was just a correlation, not any understanding of the actual causation.> > > > > > So..if I had HIV I'd throw everything I could at it, in hopes of reaching some of it in the gut. Better drugs that do this with less side effects are coming, I would predict. Meanwhile the Cd4 is what to watch since viral load is only one indicator, while Cd4 is immunity itself.> > > > > > bG> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2010 Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 Please check the following links guys,maybe some of you know it...just thought to share it:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQoNW7lOnT4http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SL1yagwaKM4http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGSlSG3pA5ohttp://www.futuretechtoday.com/health/Recommended-Resources/Technology-Videos-Worth-Watching/Deconstructing-The-Myth-Of-AIDS--Null.html just a thought :)Saud H. Alfarhanemail: s3oody2@...Skype: saud.alfarhanContact number: +965 999 33848 From: Baby_grand <bobluhrsexchange (DOT) microsoft. com>Subject: [beck-blood- electrification] Re: HIV thoughtsBeck-blood-electrif ication@gro ups.comDate: Friday, March 12, 2010, 6:19 PM there's a group called "magpulser" that sells giant ones that use two car batteries, and are for Lyme's disease. That would be about the only one I've seen might help...bG> > >> > > This damnable virus has made lives miserable and short. It has persisted despite throwing stuff at it that should have killed it off long ago.> > > > > > But the virus is in places you cannot easily reach with either Beck's or completely with meds. New meds are currently underway to address this problem of entering the gut linings. If these new meds can be so designed it may mark the beginning of the end for HIV, and we might expect complete remissions from it in large numbers of cases.> > > > > > The reason they have not focused on this earlier was that HIV was not assumed to live in the gut, just the blood and lymph. Even Beck fell for that assumption. Had he lived past Dec 2006, he would have seen this too, and perhaps been able to come up with some sort of trick to attack the virus with a new protocol.> > > > > > The treatments, both alt and mainst, have been failing, not because they could not reduce the virus, but they were aimed at the wrong target area in the body. Electricity and meds will both slaughter the virus in a test tube, where we can isolate the virus. But in the body we were shooting at the house while the virus was in the barn all along. > > > > > > Al Capone was by trade a book keeper. He said, "The profit on booze, by the time you pay everyone off, is less than on milk. I tell you we've been in the wrong business right from the start!" In like manner, we have been treating blood while missing most of the HIV.> > > > > > 90 percent or more of the virus lives in the gut linings. It can mutate and the mutated strains get into bloodstream, and that is what you see in the viral load numbers. But the mother lode, the matrix, the stash of HIV is in the gut linings, protected by the body's own defensive shields. This highly concentrated and deadly deposit of virus is extremely delicate. It cannot live in blood or anywhere else. It must mutate first, then it can travel. Once it enters blood, the immune system makes antibodies for it, and attacks it. So it can rise and fall in blood readings. The viral load count is one way to tell how active the virus is and will be, as it measures the mutation, and hence the strength of the underlying HIV in gut. Physicians prior to Dec 2006 did not know all this. All they knew was historical data that says if your viral load is 100,000 you can be expected to lose 50-100 CD4 per year. It was just a correlation, not any understanding of the actual causation.> > > > > > So..if I had HIV I'd throw everything I could at it, in hopes of reaching some of it in the gut. Better drugs that do this with less side effects are coming, I would predict. Meanwhile the Cd4 is what to watch since viral load is only one indicator, while Cd4 is immunity itself.> > > > > > bG> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2010 Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 Thanks for the video links. I knew the pharmaceutical companies were bad before, but this really puts a nail on it.  It's complete BS to measure viral load using antibodies when they can not evenisolate the virus in a HIV patient.   I feel really bad for those who have been diagnosed with a false positive. So many people these days go in to get tested and they do not realize the tests are all BS.   In china, the government kills people on the spot if they are diagnosed as positive.  I will not get tested for this anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2010 Report Share Posted March 13, 2010 holy shit!!! I didnt know in China get killed instantly if they get a positive test....thats really cruel!!! Saud H. Alfarhanemail: s3oody2@...Skype: saud.alfarhanContact number: +965 999 33848From: Chen <scott.c.chen@...>Subject: Re: Re: HIV thoughtsTo: Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 10:29 AM Thanks for the video links. I knew the pharmaceutical companies were bad before, but this really puts a nail on it. It's complete BS to measure viral load using antibodies when they can not evenisolate the virus in a HIV patient. I feel really bad for those who have been diagnosed with a false positive. So many people these days go in to get tested and they do not realize the tests are all BS. In china, the government kills people on the spot if they are diagnosed as positive. I will not get tested for this anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2010 Report Share Posted March 13, 2010 one of the most shocking statements on the videos I saw was the statement of Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier (the first video)....that was to me an eye opener. And the fact you can be negative somewhere and positive somewhere else and that the tests are big hoax? thats stupid!!!SaudSaud H. Alfarhanemail: s3oody2@...Skype: saud.alfarhanContact number: +965 999 33848From: Chen <scott.c.chen@...>Subject: Re: Re: HIV thoughts Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 10:29 AM Thanks for the video links. I knew the pharmaceutical companies were bad before, but this really puts a nail on it. It's complete BS to measure viral load using antibodies when they can not evenisolate the virus in a HIV patient. I feel really bad for those who have been diagnosed with a false positive. So many people these days go in to get tested and they do not realize the tests are all BS. In china, the government kills people on the spot if they are diagnosed as positive. I will not get tested for this anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2010 Report Share Posted March 13, 2010 Yeap, from what I heard, they take you out the fire squad andshot you! This is their way to control the fake spread. Chinahas too many people, so another excuse for government toget rid of . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 Hi, Joe, well, it's not clear if the big magpulser would do HIV in the gut, still, we might be onto something if the MRI worked, maybe this has partial chance? MRI has stronger magnets for sure, but they are more distant, where this coil can rest right on the spot. It's about a 700-900 investment for the device and two car batteries and charger to run it. i have just loaned mine out to a friend with Lyme's disease, who is going to try to kill off the bacteria with it. It's just an idea, but might be worth your while if his results are good you might want to try. What I could provide is some sort of info on timing, gradual buildup, etc. If it truly works you might be experiencing massive dieoffs, due maybe to HIV but also other stuff. You need to time the applications to interrupt its replication cycles, which for HIV is 1.2 days. So at least two separated times each day without fail to knock it down, maybe two 10-20 minute sessions? This might be a fianl value, but start with 2 1-2 minute sessions for a few days and add a minute or two each day till dieoffs occur. When they do, cut back a few minutes each day (but continue steadily) till the dieoffs end. Then begin increasing till they come back. Jockey this back and forth..report results at least weekly, make daily notes even if no changes. I also think possibly using a dc current source across the gut area while using this large pulser could act to drive extra current down into the gut? Only do this if no changes or benefits occurring, to possibly bump it up a bit. Not really sure if that could work, but a heavy pulsation close to the surface might force electrons to repel down into the gut area and increase the total current applied to virus. It is the total current (milliamps times time in minutes, etc) that counts. It can be low intensity for longer time, or higher intensity for shorter time. HIV in brain is very late stage and usually not seen till the end stages of AIDS. There is not a lot for them to do in the brain, as the cd4 antigens they like to bind onto are few up there. The gut/thymus, etc would be more productive for the virus, as cells with cd4 antigens abound there. Well, that's a start.. bG wish we could simply get to hiv with dc currents rather than using magnetic induction, which is going to be weak by comparison. > > > > > > > > This damnable virus has made lives miserable and short. It has persisted despite throwing stuff at it that should have killed it off long ago. > > > > > > > > But the virus is in places you cannot easily reach with either Beck's or completely with meds. New meds are currently underway to address this problem of entering the gut linings. If these new meds can be so designed it may mark the beginning of the end for HIV, and we might expect complete remissions from it in large numbers of cases. > > > > > > > > The reason they have not focused on this earlier was that HIV was not assumed to live in the gut, just the blood and lymph. Even Beck fell for that assumption. Had he lived past Dec 2006, he would have seen this too, and perhaps been able to come up with some sort of trick to attack the virus with a new protocol. > > > > > > > > The treatments, both alt and mainst, have been failing, not because they could not reduce the virus, but they were aimed at the wrong target area in the body. Electricity and meds will both slaughter the virus in a test tube, where we can isolate the virus. But in the body we were shooting at the house while the virus was in the barn all along. > > > > > > > > Al Capone was by trade a book keeper. He said, " The profit on booze, by the time you pay everyone off, is less than on milk. I tell you we've been in the wrong business right from the start! " In like manner, we have been treating blood while missing most of the HIV. > > > > > > > > 90 percent or more of the virus lives in the gut linings. It can mutate and the mutated strains get into bloodstream, and that is what you see in the viral load numbers. But the mother lode, the matrix, the stash of HIV is in the gut linings, protected by the body's own defensive shields. This highly concentrated and deadly deposit of virus is extremely delicate. It cannot live in blood or anywhere else. It must mutate first, then it can travel. Once it enters blood, the immune system makes antibodies for it, and attacks it. So it can rise and fall in blood readings. The viral load count is one way to tell how active the virus is and will be, as it measures the mutation, and hence the strength of the underlying HIV in gut. Physicians prior to Dec 2006 did not know all this. All they knew was historical data that says if your viral load is 100,000 you can be expected to lose 50-100 CD4 per year. It was just a correlation, not any understanding of > the actual causation. > > > > > > > > So..if I had HIV I'd throw everything I could at it, in hopes of reaching some of it in the gut. Better drugs that do this with less side effects are coming, I would predict. Meanwhile the Cd4 is what to watch since viral load is only one indicator, while Cd4 is immunity itself. > > > > > > > > bG > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 Saud: Thanks for posting these videos. I'm an old guy; not used to thinking of an entire consortium of corporations being against life for the purpose of sales. I guess that it is so. This year I began studying vaccinations because of a friend who has an autistic grandson. He is a chemist and discovered that mercury in vaccinations was the probable cause. My first try was to find the Kennedy report on vaccinations. It indicated that there was a massive cover-up. Then I found Dr. Moulden and his perspective on vaccinations. Now this! It's better that truth is known. Dick > > > one of the most shocking statements on the videos I saw was the statement of Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier (the first video)....that was to me an eye opener. And the fact you can be negative somewhere and positive somewhere else and that the tests are big hoax? thats stupid!!! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 I'm not sure where I picked this up but its in my head. The pulser technology is closest to some of the multiwave oscillators that came out post Rife. I would love to see a non-contact non-frequency specific zapping device. Keep on this path and you should be able to attack HIV no matter where it exists in the body. Rife technology worked because he knew the frequencies. If we can develop a multiwave non-contact device, we won't have to worry so much about the frequencies and should be able to come up with something that energizes the body and kills invaders. Just a thought. Believe me all this stuff is way above my head as I sit here with a beck device pulsing across my ankles! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 well the issue is not so much frequency as intensity or amplitude, how hard the waves bang the bugs, not how often. NIH did some calculating and/or testing and determined that, yes, you can oscillate a bug to death, but a lot of surrounding good stuff goes with it by the time you increase the power levels to where it would actually work. Here's my analogy, an opera singer cracking a glass hits the right note and the glass shatters, it would appear. But unless the voice is loud enough, nothing will happen. So the " loud " is the problem with the frequency idea. Rife used his oscillations on bugs in slides etc where the area was small and the energy needed was small. How he could then work this magic in a body is not really clear at all. bG > > I'm not sure where I picked this up but its in my head. The pulser technology is closest to some of the multiwave oscillators that came out post Rife. I would love to see a non-contact non-frequency specific zapping device. Keep on this path and you should be able to attack HIV no matter where it exists in the body. Rife technology worked because he knew the frequencies. If we can develop a multiwave non-contact device, we won't have to worry so much about the frequencies and should be able to come up with something that energizes the body and kills invaders. > > Just a thought. Believe me all this stuff is way above my head as I sit here with a beck device pulsing across my ankles! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 my opinion; to determine the frequency or amplitude. To find that, one would simply have to experiment with samples of a host. Changing the f and or a or both that works best/safest to nuetralize a specific component outside the body. Then inject host into an organ. Maybe from a large pig's or hog's that was freshly slaughtered: bone, muscle, brain, lymph, skin, intestine, fluids to determine the f/a that attenuates the best/safest inside the organ. I would gladly make time to do these experiments, but I do not have the funds for the equipment. Also i'm not a qualified scientist, but can take records well and follow instruction. Data entry and video games! Plus Hispanic and other cultures have celebrations where pigs or goats are slaughtered then cooked and ate. Talk about a fresh meal, delicious. Just remember to take out the experimental organs/samples and keep totally out of reach indefinitely!From: zappingfool <zappingfool@...> Sent: Tue, March 16, 2010 4:30:43 PMSubject: Re: HIV thoughts I'm not sure where I picked this up but its in my head. The pulser technology is closest to some of the multiwave oscillators that came out post Rife. I would love to see a non-contact non-frequency specific zapping device. Keep on this path and you should be able to attack HIV no matter where it exists in the body. Rife technology worked because he knew the frequencies. If we can develop a multiwave non-contact device, we won't have to worry so much about the frequencies and should be able to come up with something that energizes the body and kills invaders. Just a thought. Believe me all this stuff is way above my head as I sit here with a beck device pulsing across my ankles! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2010 Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 Joe, you can make one of these things very cheaply, i think they ask a small donation for plans, only. The parts look like under 50 bucks, and it's pretty simple project, would take a couple weekends probably to get it up and running. Here's the link: http://www.harmony4life.net/Materials.htm this is mostly parts from auto parts stores, so should be easily available. The person who invented it has Lyme's and found it very helpful, did years on it. So stands to reason it could have some effects on the HIV in the gut ! ? ! bG > > > > > > > > > > This damnable virus has made lives miserable and short. It has persisted despite throwing stuff at it that should have killed it off long ago. > > > > > > > > > > But the virus is in places you cannot easily reach with either Beck's or completely with meds. New meds are currently underway to address this problem of entering the gut linings. If these new meds can be so designed it may mark the beginning of the end for HIV, and we might expect complete remissions from it in large numbers of cases. > > > > > > > > > > The reason they have not focused on this earlier was that HIV was not assumed to live in the gut, just the blood and lymph. Even Beck fell for that assumption. Had he lived past Dec 2006, he would have seen this too, and perhaps been able to come up with some sort of trick to attack the virus with a new protocol. > > > > > > > > > > The treatments, both alt and mainst, have been failing, not because they could not reduce the virus, but they were aimed at the wrong target area in the body. Electricity and meds will both slaughter the virus in a test tube, where we can isolate the virus. But in the body we were shooting at the house while the virus was in the barn all along. > > > > > > > > > > Al Capone was by trade a book keeper. He said, " The profit on booze, by the time you pay everyone off, is less than on milk. I tell you we've been in the wrong business right from the start! " In like manner, we have been treating blood while missing most of the HIV. > > > > > > > > > > 90 percent or more of the virus lives in the gut linings. It can mutate and the mutated strains get into bloodstream, and that is what you see in the viral load numbers. But the mother lode, the matrix, the stash of HIV is in the gut linings, protected by the body's own defensive shields. This highly concentrated and deadly deposit of virus is extremely delicate. It cannot live in blood or anywhere else. It must mutate first, then it can travel. Once it enters blood, the immune system makes antibodies for it, and attacks it. So it can rise and fall in blood readings. The viral load count is one way to tell how active the virus is and will be, as it measures the mutation, and hence the strength of the underlying HIV in gut. Physicians prior to Dec 2006 did not know all this. All they knew was historical data that says if your viral load is 100,000 you can be expected to lose 50-100 CD4 per year. It was just a correlation, not any understanding of > > the actual causation. > > > > > > > > > > So..if I had HIV I'd throw everything I could at it, in hopes of reaching some of it in the gut. Better drugs that do this with less side effects are coming, I would predict. Meanwhile the Cd4 is what to watch since viral load is only one indicator, while Cd4 is immunity itself. > > > > > > > > > > bG > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 19, 2010 Report Share Posted March 19, 2010 And that is why Rife used resonant frequencies. It was bug specific and did not require the amplitudes/intensity you mention BG. I guess what I'd like to understand is more about the multiwave oscillator technology. I'm not sure how it actually worked if in fact it did. > > > > I'm not sure where I picked this up but its in my head. The pulser technology is closest to some of the multiwave oscillators that came out post Rife. I would love to see a non-contact non-frequency specific zapping device. Keep on this path and you should be able to attack HIV no matter where it exists in the body. Rife technology worked because he knew the frequencies. If we can develop a multiwave non-contact device, we won't have to worry so much about the frequencies and should be able to come up with something that energizes the body and kills invaders. > > > > Just a thought. Believe me all this stuff is way above my head as I sit here with a beck device pulsing across my ankles! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2010 Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 not really sure, but believe NIH would have had to use the resonance frequency otherwise why do the experiment. bG > > > > > > I'm not sure where I picked this up but its in my head. The pulser technology is closest to some of the multiwave oscillators that came out post Rife. I would love to see a non-contact non-frequency specific zapping device. Keep on this path and you should be able to attack HIV no matter where it exists in the body. Rife technology worked because he knew the frequencies. If we can develop a multiwave non-contact device, we won't have to worry so much about the frequencies and should be able to come up with something that energizes the body and kills invaders. > > > > > > Just a thought. Believe me all this stuff is way above my head as I sit here with a beck device pulsing across my ankles! > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.