Guest guest Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 on the other hand, prisons are designed for isolation, so they could maybe isolate from the contaminated outside and thus were even safer ?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 But they are all overcrowded and put two to three per cell. And the health care in prison is the worst. > > on the other hand, prisons are designed for isolation, > so they could maybe isolate from the contaminated outside > and thus were even safer ?! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 When and how do illegal drugs enter the prison? It happens all the time. Visiting day, staff interaction with prisoners... > > but how does the virus enter the cell ? Or the prison ? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 It would take quite an island facility to hold all the prisoners in the U.S. As of 2000, the prison population of the U.S. was over 2 million and I don't think it has shrunk any since then. And that doesn't count the guards and administrative personnell. Could you imagine an emergency evacuation of all 2 million prisoners to an (untested) off shore prison? And one case of bird flu among the millions of criminals in the new facility -- that would take care of the problem of overcrowded prisons at least. > > > In einer eMail vom 19.04.2006 14:04:35 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt > a1tommyl@...: > > actually, one sneeze from a passing guard that was at home the night > before.... > > > > guards won't be let out at night.They sleep in the building. > I remember the New Zealand plan, who want to put all prisoners > on an extra island > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2006 Report Share Posted April 20, 2006 Which means that they are also perfect breeding grounds for the further mutation of a human to human transmissible bird flu. Further, since the prisons are well supplied with rats (the last US prison which permitted cats closed a few years ago), we must wonder about that interaction. > Prisons are perfect breeding grounds for infection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2006 Report Share Posted April 21, 2006 You cannot keep illegal drugs out of the prisons and you will not be able to keep such a flu out. It is that simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2006 Report Share Posted April 21, 2006 There have been proposals to open a prison on one of the Aleutian islands off the coast of Alaska. But the problem is that relatives want to see prisoners, and prison staff do not want to live in such a remote location: prisons do have to hire staff and pay them to live where they do. So proposals to open a prison off the Alaskan coast have failed despite the appeal that such a prison could be located so close to Russia that escapees would find themselves unable to reach the US mainland and would be forced to head for the Russian wilderness. I do not believe that Russia has ever commented on such proposals. A prison in the Arctic would only be for Federal prisoners. Since many prisons are State prisons and not Federal prisons, they would not be a part of this plan and so their prisoners would not fall under this. In any case, a prison in the Arctic would merely be a new Alcatraz. It would only hold the worst prisoners, not all of them. http://www.nps.gov/alcatraz/ http://www.bop.gov/about/history/alcatraz.jsp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcatraz_Island Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2006 Report Share Posted April 21, 2006 Guenter, One problem with this idea is that if you waited to move all the (2 million) prisoners until the pandemic was already a reality, you would certainly miss a few infected people. Another problem is that it would take a decade and billions of dollars to build such a mega prison. A third problem is that the process of uprooting and moving such a mass of criminal humanity on a few days' notice would be a logistical nightmare of unprecedented proportions. Using all the C5A Galaxy troop transports in the US would take weeks to move that many people, and these are not willing passengers. Nor are they all located near air bases. Think of the security, ground transportation, feeding, sanitation, medical staff, administrative staff that it would take to accomplish this feat. All the while the families of the hundred thousand or so people involved in the airlift would be sick and dying, not to mention the people recruited to do the job. And then you would have to have daily transports of food and supplies. To think that the country would devote such incredible amount of money and resources to such a mega-operation to save our prisoners when the rest of the citizens are dropping like flies all over the place is unrealistic, to use the mildest term I could think of. And at the end you would have Devil's Island times 50,000 except that some of the prisoners and staff would arrive with bird flu and the rest would get it soon after. You might just as well exterminate all the prisoners at the onset. It would have the same effect but at much less cost. No, I am not suggesting we do that!!! -- Don > > > In einer eMail vom 21.04.2006 08:53:08 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt > jackalope_lepus@...: > > You cannot keep illegal drugs out of the prisons and you will not be > able to keep such a flu out. It is that simple. > > > > you could, if you really wanted to. Just a question of priorities. And these > might change in a pandemic. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2006 Report Share Posted April 21, 2006 Prison Doc Fired for Sleeping With Inmate Fri Apr 21, 7:47 AM ET VARNER, Ark. - A psychologist with the Arkansas Correction Department has been fired for allegedly having sex with an inmate, officials said. The department did not name the 54-year-old woman because the matter is still under investigation. Spokeswoman Dina Tyler said Thursday the psychologist had sex with the inmate in her office at the Cummins Unit on Monday. It is illegal for a corrections employee to have sex with an inmate and consent is not a defense, officials said. http://news./s/ap/20060421/ap_on_fe_st/prison_psychologist_fire d_1 > you could, if you really wanted to. Just a question of priorities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.