Cecium Chloride, a high Ph therapy

[Guest guest]

For many months, I've been interested in and learning about cesium chloride, a popular alternative cancer therapy that, from what I can determine, enjoys a high rate of efficacy. I'm thinking that the same theory that makes CC such a potent cancer fighter--that is, modifying the alkalinity of the body forces aberrant cell destruction--may work for ANY type of flu bug. As a starting point, I'm posting this link so that you can (a) read the whole story of CC; and ( think about how it might apply to the body to treat other maladies.

Don't bother wondering why Official Medicine has ignored this treatment which, if you dig deep enough, has MOUNTAINS of "scientific method" to support it. Cesium chloride is DIRT CHEAP, so Big Pharma isn't interested; therefore, Official Medicine isn't interested.

http://www.cancer-coverup.com/news/cancer-coverup-news-04-2002.html

[Guest guest]

Here's another link about CsCl. Very interesting. For people living with cancer this is very hopeful. http://www.annieappleseedproject.org/cesiumchloride.html

I think it would be wisest to consult your health care provider before taking CsCl as a treatment for the flu. We know that flu is viral in nature, but we're not as sure as we'd like to be that cancer is also viral. Just a word of caution.

More about CsCl at http://www.essense-of-life.com/info/cesium.htm which offers it for sale. Coy <catherinecoy@...> wrote:

For many months, I've been interested in and learning about cesium chloride, a popular alternative cancer therapy that, from what I can determine, enjoys a high rate of efficacy. I'm thinking that the same theory that makes CC such a potent cancer fighter--that is, modifying the alkalinity of the body forces aberrant cell destruction--may work for ANY type of flu bug. As a starting point, I'm posting this link so that you can (a) read the whole story of CC; and ( think about how it might apply to the body to treat other maladies.

Don't bother wondering why Official Medicine has ignored this treatment which, if you dig deep enough, has MOUNTAINS of "scientific method" to support it. Cesium chloride is DIRT CHEAP, so Big Pharma isn't interested; therefore, Official Medicine isn't interested.

http://www.cancer-coverup.com/news/cancer-coverup-news-04-2002.html

Never place a period where God has placed a comma. - Gracie

[Guest guest]

wrote: We know that flu

is viral in nature, but we're not as sure as we'd like to be that cancer is

also viral.

Yes, there are a lot of theories about what causes cancer, but I was

thinking that the high Ph would make the body less hospitable to a flu bug,

much like the theory behind ascorbic acid for the same reason. I’m all for making my body inhospitable

to bugs!

Where’s Linus ing

when you need him?!

[Guest guest]

It's possible that CsCl could destroy a flu virus, but talk with a health care provider first before self-medicating. It's safer; and, besides, if CsCl won't work against flu, why spend the money on it in the first place? Coy <catherinecoy@...> wrote:

wrote: We know that flu is viral in nature, but we're not as sure as we'd like to be that cancer is also viral.

Yes, there are a lot of theories about what causes cancer, but I was thinking that the high Ph would make the body less hospitable to a flu bug, much like the theory behind ascorbic acid for the same reason. I’m all for making my body inhospitable to bugs!

Where’s Linus ing when you need him?!

Never place a period where God has placed a comma. - Gracie

[Guest guest]

wrote: but talk

with a health care provider [HCP] first before self-medicating

You mean an Official Medicine HCP?

You’re joking. You

ought to know by now that I shall research it myself. If people are curing their cancer with cesium

chloride—and I believe that they are—yet no HCP knows enough to say

so, why would a HCP give me any better information than I can get myself?

That’s the beauty (and, admittedly, the bane) of the Internet; we

need not rely solely on Official Medicine any longer. For example…

The estimation of virus

density in isopycnic cesium chloride gradients.

http://tinyurl.com/bak2m

Dr. Brewer is still alive, I

believe. I’ll write to him.

http://www.peaknaturalproducts.com/CancerIR.htm

[Guest guest]

If you go to a conventional medicine practitioner, check with him/'her. If you go to a homeopathic practitioner, check with him/her. I just think it's wisest to talk something over with another person who just might know more than I do about something. One the the problems today, regardless of which school of thought people follow, is that some people will self-medicate without really knowing what they're doing. A health care provider can help in making more informed decisions. That is one of the reasons we go to them, whether they be conventional or homeopathic. Coy <catherinecoy@...> wrote:

wrote: but talk with a health care provider [HCP] first before self-medicating

You mean an Official Medicine HCP? You’re joking. You ought to know by now that I shall research it myself. If people are curing their cancer with cesium chloride—and I believe that they are—yet no HCP knows enough to say so, why would a HCP give me any better information than I can get myself?

That’s the beauty (and, admittedly, the bane) of the Internet; we need not rely solely on Official Medicine any longer. For example…

The estimation of virus density in isopycnic cesium chloride gradients.

http://tinyurl.com/bak2m

Dr. Brewer is still alive, I believe. I’ll write to him.

http://www.peaknaturalproducts.com/CancerIR.htm

Never place a period where God has placed a comma. - Gracie

[Guest guest]

wrote: I just think

it's wisest to talk something over with another person who just might know more

than I do about something.

Emphasis is on the word “might.” Because of the way Official Medicine,

particularly, is conducted, the chances are REMOTE that your HCP knows more

about something than you, the invested party, knows or is capable of knowing. That’s why people get such bogus

advice, in the case of cancer, from oncologists—even FAMOUS ones! Oncologists receive six feet of new published

data every month. They have no time

to sift through it with an emphasis on how it might help YOU.

In the case of the current threat of H5N1 influenza, the LESS the

citizenry relies on Official Medicine, the more likely you will live, in my

opinion.

Do your homework, people!

That would be my advice, and boards like this help enormously. Run it by a HCP, but don’t assume

that he or she knows more than you do, or that you’re capable of knowing,

through hands-on research.

Remember, a “mere” father discovered the mitigator

for adrenyleukodystrophy because only he

was extremely highly motivated to do so.

It’s a fascinating story (made into a motion picture).

http://www.myelin.org

[Guest guest]

OK, , have it your own way. I did say "health care practitioner" as an all-inclusive term. What people want to do is up to them. Coy <catherinecoy@...> wrote:

wrote: I just think it's wisest to talk something over with another person who just might know more than I do about something.

Emphasis is on the word “might.” Because of the way Official Medicine, particularly, is conducted, the chances are REMOTE that your HCP knows more about something than you, the invested party, knows or is capable of knowing. That’s why people get such bogus advice, in the case of cancer, from oncologists—even FAMOUS ones! Oncologists receive six feet of new published data every month. They have no time to sift through it with an emphasis on how it might help YOU.

In the case of the current threat of H5N1 influenza, the LESS the citizenry relies on Official Medicine, the more likely you will live, in my opinion.

Do your homework, people! That would be my advice, and boards like this help enormously. Run it by a HCP, but don’t assume that he or she knows more than you do, or that you’re capable of knowing, through hands-on research. Remember, a “mere” father discovered the mitigator for adrenyleukodystrophy because only he was extremely highly motivated to do so. It’s a fascinating story (made into a motion picture).

http://www.myelin.org

Never place a period where God has placed a comma. - Gracie

[Guest guest]

wrote: OK,

, have it your own way.

What I’m getting at is that during these extraordinary times when

so little is known with certainty about the foe we need to vanquish, a LOT of

personal homework must/should be done, even if it means going back in history,

as best we can, to 1918 to see what those folks did when confronted by a

similar enemy. The usual caveat of “what

does the doctor say?” doesn’t hold here as much as “what does

your own reading reveal?” I

just think it’s a big mistake to rely solely on Official Medicine in this

case. Heck, I can glean as much

wisdom and information from various message boards as I can from my personal

physician. Not to mention that if

this thing turns into a pandemic, none of us will be able to even REACH our

physician to have an opportunity to ask, so I think we’d better get

accustomed to finding answers for ourselves.

That’s all I’m saying.