Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 wrote: I think this is because his initial medical education was in osteopathy - another way of looking at things. Yes, indeed. Osteopaths are known for looking at the whole body—not just one particular part of it—and seeing the entire “forest.” Interesting note about the two gentlemen who discovered that bacteria—not stress—causes ulcers. One of them said that the magnification of many of the slides studied were so large that the researchers could no longer see the offending bacteria through their viewers. Dr. Marshall (I think it was) didn’t have access to the high resolution microscopes used by others, so he saw the helicobacter pylori bacteria! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 That's not exactly what I mean. He should tell us "These are the ways you can protect yourself" in plain English. We don't need to hear "We're doing all we can" or "We're working on a vaccine". This is not helpful to people who want information they can apply now. Coy <catherinecoy@...> wrote: wrote: I would like to see our Surgeon General step up and talk to the nation about this. For me, it wouldn’t matter what he said. He would be speaking the party line (conventional medicine) about “we’re going to find a vaccine” when none can be found, and “we’re doing all we can” when “all we can” isn’t good enough. I still recommend everyone do their own homework, as you have suggested. Never place a period where God has placed a comma. - Gracie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 wrote: Myself, I'm not too sure that all pharmaceuticals are toxic. Are all pharmaceuticals toxic? No, of course not. But enough are that it benefits every person to thoroughly research everything one’s doctor asks you to ingest, as you do, . Diabetes? A condition often controlled satisfactorily by diet (see www.newstart.com ). But most people don’t want to put forth the effort to restore their health through nutrition and lifestyle change. They would rather pop a pill. License to Pill http://www.grab.com/fun/specials/licensetopill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 I think it has to be a combination effort, since diet and lifestyle changes alone won't necessarily heal an illness by themselves. Coy <catherinecoy@...> wrote: wrote: Myself, I'm not too sure that all pharmaceuticals are toxic. Are all pharmaceuticals toxic? No, of course not. But enough are that it benefits every person to thoroughly research everything one’s doctor asks you to ingest, as you do, . Diabetes? A condition often controlled satisfactorily by diet (see www.newstart.com ). But most people don’t want to put forth the effort to restore their health through nutrition and lifestyle change. They would rather pop a pill. License to Pill http://www.grab.com/fun/specials/licensetopill Never place a period where God has placed a comma. - Gracie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 wrote: I think it has to be a combination effort, since diet and lifestyle changes alone won't necessarily heal an illness by themselves. Perhaps, but why don’t physicians and patients at least TRY diet and lifestyle changes FIRST? Too much effort…not enough profit for the docs. Any physician who prescribed a trip to the Weimar Institute (www.newstart.com) first would soon find himself with no patients and a skinny bank account. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 I do know that in the area of cardiology more and more physicians - and this is becoming most prevalent among the younger ones - are stressing diet and life-styles changes. I don't know if any of them would advise patients to check our Weimar, but I wouldn't mind spending some time there myself. Coy <catherinecoy@...> wrote: wrote: I think it has to be a combination effort, since diet and lifestyle changes alone won't necessarily heal an illness by themselves. Perhaps, but why don’t physicians and patients at least TRY diet and lifestyle changes FIRST? Too much effort…not enough profit for the docs. Any physician who prescribed a trip to the Weimar Institute (www.newstart.com) first would soon find himself with no patients and a skinny bank account. Never place a period where God has placed a comma. - Gracie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2005 Report Share Posted October 13, 2005 As far as I know, not one homeopathic medicinal has been approved by the FDA. All medications have inert ingredients, many of which act as binders. They are what keeps pills from crumbling into powder.Lee <jackalope_lepus@...> wrote: Two questions:1. Are homeopathic medicinals approved by the FDA?2. I understand that the reason that homeopathic medicinals are not tested by the FDA is that they contain inert ingredients of no value, right?> Question: Is there a difference between treating with pharmaceuticals and treating with homeopathic medicinals? Is one better than the other? Never place a period where God has placed a comma. - Gracie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.