Guest guest Posted February 1, 2003 Report Share Posted February 1, 2003 > Blows blood type A, best as vegetarians out of the water too. I've had the same experience, I'm type A and was vegetarian for a while, and it did NOT work for me. It wasn't specifically the type A diet, but after the fact I read about the type A diet in the Eat Right 4 Your Type book, and my diet when I was a vegetarian was essentially his type A diet, only included a few of his " avoid " foods (like tomatoes and other nightshades). I feel SO much better eating generous amounts of the things D'Adamo says are practically poison for my blood type - beef, butter, dairy in many forms, etc., and no soy except for small amounts of fermented products such as miso and soy sauce. In reading the blood type book again, what he describes for type A is almost completely opposite of my own experience in some ways. For instance, he says something to the effect of " you may have already noticed that when you eat meat, you feel heavy and sluggish " , but I find quality meat to be energizing (with the exception of pork, which usually doesn't agree with me). The blood type diet believers I've talked with about this say maybe I have a subtype that changes my reaction, but when I read in the book and D'Adamo's website about subtypes, none of it indicates the reactions he predicts would be so opposite as mine. So, that pretty much shoots down his whole theory as far as I'm concerned. He says it should work for all people of each blood type, but it certainly doesn't for me. On the vegetarian diet very close to his type A diet, I started to gain weight, my skin got very dry and started to look more aged than it should, and I started to have the same blood sugar swings I did years ago when I ate a standard American diet. Aubin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2003 Report Share Posted February 2, 2003 Hi, I just had to comment on the similarities of my experience, first with Wanita's last paragraph, and second with Aubin's entire post, which I had to check and make sure I didn't write myself (maybe like sleep-posting or something). May I jump in and ask one quick question to you, Aubin? Has your current diet completely cured your dry skin? Thanks, > <wanitawa@b...> wrote: > > > Blows blood type A, best as vegetarians out of the water too. > > I've had the same experience, I'm type A and was vegetarian for a > while, and it did NOT work for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2003 Report Share Posted February 2, 2003 > May I jump in and ask one quick question to you, Aubin? Has your > current diet completely cured your dry skin? Well, yes. I'd never had dry skin before that, except for the first couple months of pregnancy (when the hormones are really in an uproar and *everything* gets weird), and it hasn't been dry again since quitting the vegetarian thing and going NT. I do use lotion on my hands, they get dry because I wash them a lot (animals, kids, and my life in general tend to require lots of hand washing), and some cream on my face occasionally. It's not as if I've had a lifetime of dry skin and NT cured it, but it reversed the dry skin I had while eating vegetarian. I had started to notice my face looking rapidly more aged, kind of dull and with more lines, but now that's gone, I don't feel like I look older than my actual age anymore. Aubin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2003 Report Share Posted February 2, 2003 At 05:32 AM 2/2/03 +0000, you wrote: > >Well, yes. I'd never had dry skin before that, except for the first >couple months of pregnancy (when the hormones are really in >an uproar and *everything* gets weird), and it hasn't been dry >again since quitting the vegetarian thing and going NT. It's not as >if I've had a lifetime of dry skin and NT cured it, but it reversed the >dry skin I had while eating vegetarian. I had started to notice my >face looking rapidly more aged, kind of dull and with more lines, >but now that's gone, I don't feel like I look older than my actual >age anymore. Now that I think about it it could have been me thinking back to my skin and diet too with your post, Aubin. In '89 I stopped eating fat on meat because of what seemed to be gall bladder problems. My diet then was more the meat and potatoes I grew up on. From then till NT I added more salads, fruit, less protein, more carb meal stretchers, bad fats and cut out dairy. The hypoglycemia that began the same time as the gall bladder didn't reduce until NT less than a year ago. My face wrinkles and aging they gave me then I was not happy with. Now they're nearly gone or gone. We've had a harder winter than usual but my skin is fine except for my hands as usual in and out of water, heat and cold. I do have this patch of eczema on my left elbow that was there last I remember the winter of '85. Its just pink, half the size it was then, not scaly, itchy, bleed if you scratch like then. Am thinking has my skin reversed 18 years or what would it be like if I wasn't eating NT. Wanita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2003 Report Share Posted February 2, 2003 > <wanitawa@b...> wrote: > > > > > Blows blood type A, best as vegetarians out of the water too. > > > > I've had the same experience, I'm type A and was vegetarian for a > > while, and it did NOT work for me. i've never read d'adamo's book, but was interested in his theory. So on my low carb list, I set up a poll, asking people for whom low carb was working select their blood types. Low carb worked for all blood group types, whereas I believe it is most suited to the O-group. OK, so only 12 people voted, but it was enough to suggest to me that the theory wasn't valid, and that as a Type AB, I should carry on with low carb, if it was working. Jo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2003 Report Share Posted February 3, 2003 >> Excuse a little nit-picking, but I really dislike seeing the type A plan described at vegetarian and really don't understand why Dr. D'Adamo has it on his book jackets. There are quite few fish listed as beneficial and neutral; and much poultry is neutral; << I am type A, but I absolutely cannot do veggie - it totally whacks my blood sugar. That said, I agree that it's not a purely veggie diet. However, chicken and fish don't cut it for me - I do much better eating LOTS of red meat! The blood-type diet profile plain doesn't work for my metabolism! And my type-A hubby gained and gained and never lost an ounce for years until Atkins, and now he's lost 100lb on red meat and cheese. :-) He eats veggies too, but we eat more red meat than chicken and fish. ~ Carma ~ " Having a family is like having a bowling alley installed inside your head. " ~ Mull ~ Home Education Resources & Links Directory: http://members.ispwest.com/paden/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2003 Report Share Posted February 3, 2003 Carma- >I am type A, but I absolutely cannot do veggie - it totally whacks my blood >sugar. Me too. >chicken and fish don't cut it for me - I do much better eating LOTS of red >meat! The blood-type diet profile plain doesn't work for my metabolism! And me again! Eating loads of red meat is the best single thing I seem to be able to do for my health, energy and weight. I think the blood type diet is basically complete bunk for two reasons. First, all the improvements people of all blood types have enjoyed by employing it can be ascribed to cutting out junk food, which has nothing to do with the actual blood type hypothesis. And second, I don't think these undigested lectins would be getting into the bloodstream at all without serious digestive impairment, so if you improve digestion and overall health, it becomes a non-issue -- and as far as I can tell, the key to improving digestion and overall health almost always involves the proper animal foods -- good fats, including plenty of saturated fat, bone broths, a decent amount of animal protein, etc. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 At 02:56 PM 2/3/03 -0500, wrote: and as far as I can tell, the key >to improving digestion and overall health almost always involves the proper >animal foods -- good fats, including plenty of saturated fat, bone broths, >a decent amount of animal protein, etc. The rawer the better, too. Amazed at my digestion with rare grass fed beef. Better than cooked and much better than the high carb, low protein, low fat stretched meals of before. Haven't got to raw liver myself. Thinking of pate maybe. Have some lamb liver given me by person I work for. She needed freezer room for this year's. Is organic grain and grass fed, raised about a mile from here and I take care of livestock when she goes away. Not ideal but I'd be more familiar with its raising only if I did it all myself. Get nauseated if I take a B complex supplement over 50 mg. so liver is the way to go. Wanita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 > But there is more to the blood type > plans than carbs, and it is definitely possible for > any blood type to follow the blood type plans and > low-carb too. It seems to me in order to follow his type A guidelines and be low carb, your only high protein sources of food would be soy (which he pushes, pushes, pushes for type A, in every form, and which also contains significant carbs if not in an isolated protein form), the fish species he suggests are beneficial (only a handful of which I've ever seen in stores in my area), and only very occasional poultry, eggs and the few dairy items he lists as neutral, since he says to eat mostly beneficial and keep neutral items to a minimum. Seems too monotonous for healthy eating, to me, in combo with the vegetable list for type A. > Excuse a little nit-picking, but I really dislike > seeing the type A plan described at vegetarian and > really don't understand why Dr. D'Adamo has it on his > book jackets. I believe he calls type A the " natural vegetarian " in the text of the book as well. Including fish and occasional poultry also doesn't fit my definition of vegetarian, but then I've read a lot in his theories that " doesn't fit " . > In case you all haven't guessed, my experience with > Eat Right has been positive (if nothing else, it was > through Eat Right lists that I found NT!), but also it > helped with some digestive track issues. I'm not trying to discount anyone's positive results, but the people I know who have seen benefit from it were including many things in their diets previously that I think aren't good for anybody, like large amounts of refined grains, feed lot and factory farmed meat selected on the basis that it was cheap to buy, refined vegetable oils, aspartame, distilled alcohol, pasteurized/homogenized/low fat dairy from confinement operations, etc. Certainly they're doing better on their blood type diet than they were before, but I believe they could have obtained the same and possibly greater benefits doing something different that also eliminated items like I mentioned above but still included some of what I believe are healthful foods that D'Adamo says are avoids. > On blood > type forums, though, some of us have wondered what > impact, say, lacto-fermenting would have on " avoids " , > because I don't think they have been tested that way. > Sauerkraut is on the lists, but I'm sure what they > tested was not lacto-fermented. I also doubt if any of his " testing " was done on raw dairy or raw/rare meat, and I know personally my body reacts differently to raw dairy than pasteurized. Aubin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.