Guest guest Posted January 7, 2003 Report Share Posted January 7, 2003 Is there any solid evidence one way or another whether smoking foods is good, bad or neutral? (I mean smoking foods in the traditional way, with real smoke, not with a pile of toxic chemical additives designed to simulate traditional smoked-food flavor and sucker the buying public into thinking they're eating something tasty.) I'm starting to get into making my own sausage since it's all but impossible to find store-bought sausage, even gourmet varieties, without sugar (particularly corn syrup) and other noxious extenders. Besides, the overwhelmingly dominant trend in commercial sausage is towards low-fat imitations, often made with chicken and turkey and cardboard and probably Olestra and genetically modified partially hydrogenated motor oil, not to mention plenty of other stuff that isn't particularly tasty and definitely isn't healthy. I want plenty of delicious, fatty, low-carb sausage, and that means making it at home, but many of the nicest types of sausage require smoking. I live in an apartment, so I'm probably limited to hot-smoking in a stovetop smoker, but that may not too much of a problem as long as I'm not going to be giving myself cancer, slowing down my metabolism to the speed of a slug frozen in amber, or otherwise letting myself in for a huge pile of medical fun that I just don't want. Did Price have anything to say about smoked foods? And if smoking food is OK, are there any sources of organic wood chips and sawdust? TIA! - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.