Guest guest Posted January 15, 2003 Report Share Posted January 15, 2003 I was just reading over some articles on the WAPF site I read a long time ago, and found that the Bantu were one of the African agriculturalist tribes Price studied. I didn't remember, since I read NAPD in the early summer. The Bantu were the one traditional group mentioned in Metabolic Typing Diet that ate a low-fat diet, and it was claimed that it was because of their low-fat diet that the Bantu were free of degenerative diseases while the Eskimo and other high-fat diets gave those particular groups freedom from degenerative diseases. But Price found two things: 1) While the Bantu diet was comparatively low-fat, they valued fat and ate small animals such as frogs and placed an extremely high value on insects. Insects are the highest in fat of animals, being over 55% fat; moreover, being a " whole " animal, they are richer in the nutrients meat-eaters would have to get from organ meats. 2)The Bantu, while having superior health to those on modern foods, had a measurably worse level of health than those on higher-fat diets like cattle-herders and hunter-gatherers. Therefore, the case remains to be made that there are populations anywhere perfectly adapted to a low-fat diet (as none were mentioned except the Bantu). Moreover, someone from our culture who would follow a diet with the amount of fat a Bantu followed would be in significantly worse health, because that fat would not be coming from insects, or whole frogs, brain and liver and whatnot included. Especially since carbo types are advised to avoid organ meats due to the purine content. I also thought Walcott made a very poor case that nutritional information is " conflicting. " I'm sure there is plenty of conflicting information out there, but Walcott only gave two examples, and neither were of different studies showing opposite effects, but rather one study showing a positive effect of some supplementation and another study showing no effect. It seems to me that Walcott is just taking advantage of the popular perception that all nutritional research is inconclusive and conflicting, which is based on the many conflicting INTERPRETATIONS of scientific research, rather than actually proving his point, whether it is true or false. Like I've said, I agree with him that people will need varying amounts of protein and carbohydrate, but his diet for carbo types especially, doesn't seem to mimic ANYTHING on the spectrum of healthy traditional populations. Chris ____ " What can one say of a soul, of a heart, filled with compassion? It is a heart which burns with love for every creature: for human beings, birds, and animals, for serpents and for demons. The thought of them and the sight of them make the tears of the saint flow. And this immense and intense compassion, which flows from the heart of the saints, makes them unable to bear the sight of the smallest, most insignificant wound in any creature. Thus they pray ceaselessly, with tears, even for animals, for enemies of the truth, and for those who do them wrong. " --Saint Isaac the Syrian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.