Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Type X

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

A while back I asked Paolo (Dr. Vinci) to explain type X and also

I asked about X dominant and X recessive. What follows is what he

helped me understand. ~ Gretchen

---------------------------------------------------------

CMT X (written by Dr. Vinci)

X-linked inheritance is special. Females have two X and males only

have one; so any pathological gene on chromosome X causes the disease

in males.

Despite that females have two X, only one cell each is allowed to

work. According to the hypothesis of Lyon,* in the early stages of the

embrional development in a cell population, one X is randomly

suppressed and all the cells that will originate from that cell will

have the same X suppressed.

The situation is similar in males. But females are less severely

affected because in the females some cells originate from the cells

whose good X was suppressed and some from those whose bad X was

suppressed. So the females are mosaic: if the cells with a good X are

more numerous than the ones with the bad X, the disease will be mild

or absent. In theory they should be 50/50.

At this point it is important to know if the gene is dominant or

recessive. In the females it should cause the disease only if

dominant; for example, if that gene produces a pathological protein

that alters the good protein produced by the good gene. This mechanism

is called " dominant-negative " . CMT X due to a pathological connexin 32

is dominant; that's why females also have the disease, but more often

mild.

There are also 2 forms of CMT X that are recessive.

* Lyon's hypothesis

Also known as Lyon's phenomenon

Associated persons: Frances Lyon

Description: Hypothesis stating that only one of the two

X-chromosomes is genetically active in female cells. X inactivation

occurs around the 16th day of embryonic development.

Bibliography: M. F. Lyon:

Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus).

Nature, London, 1961, 190: 372-373.

Theory of differential inactivation of the X-chromosome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

<liliwigg@...> wrote:

> Were you ever tested for Type X? ~ Gretchen

No Gretchen, I don't think there is a need with male

to male transmission. In example, My grandad passed it

to my dad and he in turn passed it to me. Also my

grandad's brother passed it to one of his sons, (a

daughter too but that doesn't count here). I probably

didn't make that very clear in my post.

Jim in Ohio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...