Guest guest Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 Hello,,, I have chronic pain from scoliosis. I am never quite sure how to treat it. Is it from the bone? or from the nerves? or from tissue damage? Do I use heat? Ice? Exercise? Rest? Most of the times it is under control,,,but then I will get a flare up. I have joined a few of these lists,,,and done a lot of research. I would love to hear from you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 not4idiopathic wrote: > Doesn't the body's capacity to handle oxidative stress rely on it's antioxidant supply vs. demand? If the demand becomes greater, there is an evident misfire which would likely be in the cycle which is chiefly responsible for this capacity. It's much more complex than that. Read Marty Pall's book. > How is it that the NO-OONO cycle can become corrupt without a reduction in capacity to eliminate toxins and oxidative stress? Again, it is far more complex than you are making it out to be. Genetic factors, hormonal status, nutritional status, etc. all play into this. You are trying to simplify something that is not simple. > In the disarray of understanding our commonalities, research has burrowed heads in the sand in niches of our bodies. Occasionally when a key person views the systemic failures in order we gain greater understanding because it just makes sense. That is exactly what Marty has done. He has looked at the whole picture and discovered a new paradigm of human disease, the tenth paradigm. Jeri <teewinot13@...> @>--->---->~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<----<---<@ Dr. Pall's NO/ONOO- Theory/Treatment Discussion Group: TenthParadigmSociety @>----------<---------->----------<----------<----------<@ The Tenth Paradigm Society for CFS, MCS, FM, PTSD, GWS & others: http://www.geocities.com/tenthparadigm @>----------<---------->----------<----------<----------<@ MCS-SinglesConnection: For all singles MCSers 18 and over: MCS-SinglesConnection @>----------<---------->----------<----------<----------<@ MCS-Florida - For All Chemically Sensitive Floridians MCS-Florida ---------- ---------- No viruses detected in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.27/2112 - Release Date: 05/13/09 07:04:00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Jeri, I haven't read a book in years. If you have the cliff notes version and would like to share, I'd appreciate it. I understand there are varying factors. I think it's rather escapist to use the word complex to explain it. I'll simplify... When glutathione is deficient and the subsequent methylation cycle occurs, ADMA becomes deficient which elevates NO. Then almost separately, the glutathione depletion causes an increase of hydrogen peroxide which raises superoxide levels causing the Krebs block by removing an iron ion from aconitase. Also, the superoxide reacts with nitric oxide which creates peroxynitrite. There are intermediary steps omitted for brevity, but the sequences are simple biology and irrefutable, if I stated it correctly, but someone is welcome to correct me. Jeri, in my effort to find some peace in my health I have been to several doctors and their network of labs and consultants who all focused on the Krebs cycle. Fact is I only became terribly sicker and of less financial stature. Once I was able to wrap my brain around unblocking a specific point, methionine synthase, I began to get better. Like I've said before, actual results may vary. However there are many that have taken the route I'm on and have a good part of their lives back. It's safe to say it's not the cure, because of other factors we all agree on. However, when it comes to the chronic state of illness, cause and effect, " complex " is just a poor way to put it. Lets try, all roads lead to a slowdown of methionine synthase. Then work our way out of that by treating last things first. Cheers, R not4idiopathic wrote: > Doesn't the body's capacity to handle oxidative stress rely on it's antioxidant supply vs. demand? If the demand becomes greater, there is an evident misfire which would likely be in the cycle which is chiefly responsible for this capacity. It's much more complex than that. Read Marty Pall's book. > How is it that the NO-OONO cycle can become corrupt without a reduction in capacity to eliminate toxins and oxidative stress? Again, it is far more complex than you are making it out to be. Genetic factors, hormonal status, nutritional status, etc. all play into this. You are trying to simplify something that is not simple. > In the disarray of understanding our commonalities, research has burrowed heads in the sand in niches of our bodies. Occasionally when a key person views the systemic failures in order we gain greater understanding because it just makes sense. That is exactly what Marty has done. He has looked at the whole picture and discovered a new paradigm of human disease, the tenth paradigm. Jeri <teewinot13@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 I read the book and as I read it, I thought I understood it. But now I couldn't explain anything at all about it. With the brain fog most of us have, Jeri, you are asking us to do the impossible. jprutty wrote: > > > Jeri, > > I haven't read a book in years. If you have the cliff notes version > and would like to share, I'd appreciate it. > > I understand there are varying factors. I think it's rather escapist > to use the word complex to explain it. I'll simplify... > > When glutathione is deficient and the subsequent methylation cycle > occurs, ADMA becomes deficient which elevates NO. > > Then almost separately, the glutathione depletion causes an increase > of hydrogen peroxide which raises superoxide levels causing the Krebs > block by removing an iron ion from aconitase. > > Also, the superoxide reacts with nitric oxide which creates peroxynitrite. > > There are intermediary steps omitted for brevity, but the sequences > are simple biology and irrefutable, if I stated it correctly, but > someone is welcome to correct me. > > Jeri, in my effort to find some peace in my health I have been to > several doctors and their network of labs and consultants who all > focused on the Krebs cycle. Fact is I only became terribly sicker and > of less financial stature. Once I was able to wrap my brain around > unblocking a specific point, methionine synthase, I began to get > better. Like I've said before, actual results may vary. However there > are many that have taken the route I'm on and have a good part of > their lives back. It's safe to say it's not the cure, because of other > factors we all agree on. However, when it comes to the chronic state > of illness, cause and effect, " complex " is just a poor way to put it. > > Lets try, all roads lead to a slowdown of methionine synthase. Then > work our way out of that by treating last things first. > > Cheers, > R > > not4idiopathic wrote: > > > Doesn't the body's capacity to handle oxidative stress rely on it's > antioxidant supply vs. demand? If the demand becomes greater, there is > an evident misfire which would likely be in the cycle which is chiefly > responsible for this capacity. > > It's much more complex than that. Read Marty Pall's book. > > > How is it that the NO-OONO cycle can become corrupt without a > reduction in capacity to eliminate toxins and oxidative stress? > > Again, it is far more complex than you are making it out to be. Genetic > factors, hormonal status, nutritional status, etc. all play into this. > You are trying to simplify something that is not simple. > > > In the disarray of understanding our commonalities, research has > burrowed heads in the sand in niches of our bodies. Occasionally when > a key person views the systemic failures in order we gain greater > understanding because it just makes sense. > > That is exactly what Marty has done. He has looked at the whole picture > and discovered a new paradigm of human disease, the tenth paradigm. > > Jeri <teewinot13@... <mailto:teewinot13%40bellsouth.net>> > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 jprutty wrote: > I haven't read a book in years. If you have the cliff notes version and would like to share, I'd appreciate it. The information is on the 10P website. URL i9s in the sig below. > I understand there are varying factors. I think it's rather escapist to use the word complex to explain it. I'll simplify... The NO/ONOO- cycle *is* complex. > When glutathione is deficient and the subsequent methylation cycle occurs, ADMA becomes deficient which elevates NO. Not everyone with CFIDS is deficient in glutathione. I never have been. Lowering NMDA and vanilloid receptor activity in the brain and downregulating other aspects of the cycle in the brain have led to great improvement for many people. > Lets try, all roads lead to a slowdown of methionine synthase. Then work our way out of that by treating last things first. I disagree. Jeri <teewinot13@...> @>--->---->~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<----<---<@ Dr. Pall's NO/ONOO- Theory/Treatment Discussion Group: TenthParadigmSociety @>----------<---------->----------<----------<----------<@ The Tenth Paradigm Society for CFS, MCS, FM, PTSD, GWS & others: http://www.geocities.com/tenthparadigm @>----------<---------->----------<----------<----------<@ MCS-SinglesConnection: For all singles MCSers 18 and over: MCS-SinglesConnection @>----------<---------->----------<----------<----------<@ MCS-Florida - For All Chemically Sensitive Floridians MCS-Florida ---------- ---------- No viruses detected in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.29/2114 - Release Date: 05/14/09 06:28:00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Jeri, As I said, using the word complex is rather escapist. I reiterate that because you are touting someone else's medals without speaking of their deeds. At the end, I'll paste in the remainder of my message that you chose not to respond to because we aren't running a disinformation campaign here. Last I checked. I respect your right to disagree without explanation, but that goes back to your choice of using " complex " . I can understand that you've learned enough to believe in what you know without remembering why. I think that happens to many of us. Firstly though, in regards to your statement about never being low in glutathione, I admire the confidence in yourself, doctors and labs to be able to believe that all of your testing has been accurate. In respect to glutathione, I'm wondering if you assumed you weren't deficient because of a normal methylmalonic acid or FIGLU? Or maybe you had testing through Vitamin Diagnostics or even Genova. Personal note on MCS is that went away in me once I diminished my toxin load and partially restored my body's capacity to handle toxins. As I'm sure you know, unfortunately there are those with genetics that cause them to be extremely sensitive to molds, chemicals and such. Without that testing I'm assuming I'm on the more lenient side of genetics. I hope that you are able to at the least, reduce the severity of your illness. I say this because my allergies and MCS decreased after my first round of detoxing, without doing anything else. After that I began the Simplified Protocol for GD-MCB and even after those symptoms returned, they never gained the same severity and have now diminished into nonexistence. Most importantly and the reason for my tone, there are many that view these posts who have very little capacity to do research on their own to discern which experimental protocol is better. The more we snip posts to make ourselves look righteous and avoid answering the tough questions, the more we look like marketing agents promoting our heartfelt cause. I can be guilty of that as well. Please understand the implications of posts, as they do more than make you feel good. I am sorry that you as well as every other ill person or caretaker that reads these messages feels we need to read them as we are all looking for the same thing, an answer. It's important for us all to take responsibility for what we share because disinformation or persuasive rhetoric can cost lives here. Arrogance is not reserved only for sick folks. I see it's effect on those that desire to explain us and attempt to heal us. The arrogance is blinding to the truth. Fortunately we've been blessed with some that through humility seek truth. I've said my peace and will no longer respond. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What else I wrote: ....Then almost separately, the glutathione depletion causes an increase of hydrogen peroxide which raises superoxide levels causing the Krebs block by removing an iron ion from aconitase. Also, the superoxide reacts with nitric oxide which creates peroxynitrite. There are intermediary steps omitted for brevity, but the sequences are simple biology and irrefutable, if I stated it correctly, but someone is welcome to correct me. Jeri, in my effort to find some peace in my health I have been to several doctors and their network of labs and consultants who all focused on the Krebs cycle. Fact is I only became terribly sicker and of less financial stature. Once I was able to wrap my brain around unblocking a specific point, methionine synthase, I began to get better. Like I've said before, actual results may vary. However there are many that have taken the route I'm on and have a good part of their lives back. It's safe to say it's not the cure, because of other factors we all agree on. However, when it comes to the chronic state of illness, cause and effect, " complex " is just a poor way to put it. From: Teewinot Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:23 PM Subject: Re: Chicken or the egg jprutty wrote: > I haven't read a book in years. If you have the cliff notes version and would like to share, I'd appreciate it. The information is on the 10P website. URL i9s in the sig below. > I understand there are varying factors. I think it's rather escapist to use the word complex to explain it. I'll simplify... The NO/ONOO- cycle *is* complex. > When glutathione is deficient and the subsequent methylation cycle occurs, ADMA becomes deficient which elevates NO. Not everyone with CFIDS is deficient in glutathione. I never have been. Lowering NMDA and vanilloid receptor activity in the brain and downregulating other aspects of the cycle in the brain have led to great improvement for many people. > Lets try, all roads lead to a slowdown of methionine synthase. Then work our way out of that by treating last things first. I disagree. Jeri <teewinot13@...> @>--->---->~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<----<---<@ Dr. Pall's NO/ONOO- Theory/Treatment Discussion Group: TenthParadigmSociety @>----------<---------->----------<----------<----------<@ The Tenth Paradigm Society for CFS, MCS, FM, PTSD, GWS & others: http://www.geocities.com/tenthparadigm @>----------<---------->----------<----------<----------<@ MCS-SinglesConnection: For all singles MCSers 18 and over: MCS-SinglesConnection @>----------<---------->----------<----------<----------<@ MCS-Florida - For All Chemically Sensitive Floridians MCS-Florida ---------- ---------- No viruses detected in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.29/2114 - Release Date: 05/14/09 06:28:00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.