Guest guest Posted September 16, 2006 Report Share Posted September 16, 2006 I wonder why it is people seem to think only doctors, dentists, and Big Pharma could be guilty of endorsing treatments and substances that not only do not work but may be harmful. At least these are regulated to some degree. Think about what *could* be going on in alternative health care. Example: I was using a supplement purchased at health food store, but readily available on the Internet. I was not taking the capsule whole. Rather, I opened it and put it in distilled water. When I bought the next bottle and opened a capsule there was a *completely* different substance in it. I spoke to someone at the manufacturer about it and told her there was a different substance in the capsule. She sounded as though she was thinking about what I said then as if thinking aloud responded: " Maybe the first one had the wrong substance in it. " This suggests to me it is not unusual for the wrong substance to be put into capsules. It also calls into question exactly what is being put into these alternative products. Last night Dateline did one of their investigative reports where they created a product supposedly to moisturize the skin from the inside out. What they put in the capsules was Nestles Quick Coco. They they found an infomercial producer who was more than willing to create an infomercial for them, though, they told him they did not know if the product would work and had completed no clinical trials on the product at all. The infomercial producer hired actresses and an M.D. dermatologist to endorse the product, none of whom had even tried the product. Each of these people were filmed giving quite convincing reports of how wonderful the product is and how much it helped their skin. Then, they took the product and the film out to a Mall and after watching it women said they would pay as much as $100 for a bottle of it. Dateline, further checked with their own legal department to see if they could get the infomercial on television and the overall department said they would not allow it to air without clinical trials, but they could not control affiliate stations. Now, how about the possibility of paid marketers joining these list(s) and pushing their products? I do not care how many studies or alleged material is posted about a particular treatment or substance. It easy to skew statistical material to make whatever one is pushing sound right. Even highly trained statisticians might be fooled. There is more to this than just finding some study to support anyone's particular beliefs. I have no doubt there are people in the professions that should not be there, people who are incompetent, immoral, and dangerous. The point is, however, these kind of people are everywhere and I have no doubt there are just as many in alternative health care. Maybe more since there is little if any regulation of alternative health care. Personally, I trust myself. __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.