Re: mail formatting -- REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK

[Guest guest]

Any thoughts on the new formatting in the emails, as a result of eliminating

attachments????

PLEASE SEND ME YOUR FEEDBACK.

Overall, I like the easier readability of the messages. Most of the links still

seem to come through, but not all of them.

I miss the colors. I find I can no longer use color to highlight important

parts of a message. Also, I miss the colors that others use. I suspect that

the use of bold or italics has also disappeared. I haven't experimented with

different type fonts and sizes.

What have YOU noticed?

Zoe

>>

I've written to the moderators of the Natural Thyroid Hormone group to ask

about their email settings. They say that they have it set to no attachments,

and the links come through fine.

I am going to set the group to " no attachments " for a one-day experiment. If

we like it, we can keep it that way. Otherwise, we can revert to the way it is

now. Let me know what you think.

Zoe

Moderator

[Guest guest]

depending on your email program - in Outlook Express >Format>click on Rich Text

then the font and colour you have set as your default will reappear

Lynda

Re: mail formatting -- REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK

> Any thoughts on the new formatting in the emails, as a result of eliminating

attachments????

>

> PLEASE SEND ME YOUR FEEDBACK.

>

> Overall, I like the easier readability of the messages. Most of the links

still seem to come through, but not all of them.

>

> I miss the colors. I find I can no longer use color to highlight important

parts of a message. Also, I miss the colors that others use. I suspect that

the use of bold or italics has also disappeared. I haven't experimented with

different type fonts and sizes.

>

> What have YOU noticed?

>

> Zoe

[Guest guest]

Personally I don't like the plain text. As you said it makes it harder to show

references, etc through bolding and colors. I always appreciated that this

group had that formatting as a Thyroid group I am on does not and it is

frustrating when wanting to copy/paste things I find that have HTML in them.

JMHO but I don't like this.

B.

My Ebay Auctions: http://tinyurl.com/o9nqv

MY SOY CANDLE STORE IS OPEN! COME VISIT:

http://www.marloquinn.com/SoyScentsational

Re: mail formatting -- REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK

Any thoughts on the new formatting in the emails, as a result of eliminating

attachments????

PLEASE SEND ME YOUR FEEDBACK.

Overall, I like the easier readability of the messages. Most of the links

still seem to come through, but not all of them.

I miss the colors. I find I can no longer use color to highlight important

parts of a message. Also, I miss the colors that others use. I suspect that the

use of bold or italics has also disappeared. I haven't experimented with

different type fonts and sizes.

What have YOU noticed?

Zoe

>>

I've written to the moderators of the Natural Thyroid Hormone group to ask

about their email settings. They say that they have it set to no attachments,

and the links come through fine.

I am going to set the group to " no attachments " for a one-day experiment. If

we like it, we can keep it that way. Otherwise, we can revert to the way it is

now. Let me know what you think.

Zoe

Moderator

[Guest guest]

having said that, my email was in colour and now it is not!

Lynda

Re: mail formatting -- REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK

> depending on your email program - in Outlook Express >Format>click

> on Rich Text then the font and colour you have set as your default

> will reappear

> Lynda

>

[Guest guest]

I greatly prefer this format, I think it is much easier to read. I

don't care about a change of color to highlight messages, it is still

easiest to read black on white. Thanks for changing it, I hope we

can keep it like this.

On Jul 28, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Zoe & wrote:

> Any thoughts on the new formatting in the emails, as a result of

> eliminating attachments??

>

> PLEASE SEND ME YOUR FEEDBACK.

>

> Overall, I like the easier readability of the messages. Most of

> the links still seem to come through, but not all of them.

>

> I miss the colors. I find I can no longer use color to highlight

> important parts of a message. Also, I miss the colors that others

> use. I suspect that the use of bold or italics has also

> disappeared. I haven't experimented with different type fonts and

> sizes.

>

> What have YOU noticed?

>

> Zoe

>

> I've written to the moderators of the Natural Thyroid Hormone

> group to ask about their email settings. They say that they have

> it set to no attachments, and the links come through fine.

>

> I am going to set the group to " no attachments " for a one-day

> experiment. If we like it, we can keep it that way. Otherwise, we

> can revert to the way it is now. Let me know what you think.

>

> Zoe

> Moderator

[Guest guest]

Either way is fine with me. Main point is we can keep up

this great and informative group!

Karin

Re: mail formatting -- REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK

I greatly prefer this format, I think it is much easier to read. I

don't care about a change of color to highlight messages, it is still

easiest to read black on white. Thanks for changing it, I hope we

can keep it like this.

On Jul 28, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Zoe & wrote:

> Any thoughts on the new formatting in the emails, as a result of

> eliminating attachments??

>

> PLEASE SEND ME YOUR FEEDBACK.

>

> Overall, I like the easier readability of the messages. Most of

> the links still seem to come through, but not all of them.

>

> I miss the colors. I find I can no longer use color to highlight

> important parts of a message. Also, I miss the colors that others

> use. I suspect that the use of bold or italics has also

> disappeared. I haven't experimented with different type fonts and

> sizes.

>

> What have YOU noticed?

>

> Zoe

>

> I've written to the moderators of the Natural Thyroid Hormone

> group to ask about their email settings. They say that they have

> it set to no attachments, and the links come through fine.

>

> I am going to set the group to " no attachments " for a one-day

> experiment. If we like it, we can keep it that way. Otherwise, we

> can revert to the way it is now. Let me know what you think.

>

> Zoe

> Moderator

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

If this email is spam, report it here:

http://www.OnlyMyEmail.com/ReportSpam

[Guest guest]

Zoe are you changing it all to plain test not HTML? Or just the

attachment setting?

--

Artistic Grooming- Hurricane WV

My Ebay Jewelry Store http://stores.ebay.com/valeriescrystalcreations

http://www.stopthethyroidmadness.com/

NaturalThyroidHormonesADRENALS/

[Guest guest]

I only changed the attachment setting. Zoe

Zoe are you changing it all to plain test not HTML? Or just the

attachment setting?

[Guest guest]

On 7/28/06, Zoe & <ZOEA@...> wrote:

> Any thoughts on the new formatting in the emails, as a result of eliminating

attachments????

>

> PLEASE SEND ME YOUR FEEDBACK.

I like the cange A LOT!!! Looking at posts via web-based Gmail, I

used to keep getting messages about attachments. Some may like the

color highlighting, but I found it distracting. The colored

backgrounds and " stationary " never showed up in Gmail, but I kep being

given the option to D/L the attachments, which were the background

images. Posts are now more compact. I save ALL my messages which

are not SPAM. I really appreciate plain text e-mail because it takes

up less of my disk space.

Alobar

[Guest guest]

No preference one way or the other for me.

Linn

On Jul 28, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Karin Deutschler wrote:

> Either way is fine with me. Main point is we can keep up

> this great and informative group!

> Karin

>

> Re: mail formatting -- REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK

>

> I greatly prefer this format, I think it is much easier to read. I

> don't care about a change of color to highlight messages, it is still

> easiest to read black on white. Thanks for changing it, I hope we

> can keep it like this.

>

>

>

> On Jul 28, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Zoe & wrote:

>

> > Any thoughts on the new formatting in the emails, as a result of

> > eliminating attachments??

> >

> > PLEASE SEND ME YOUR FEEDBACK.

> >

> > Overall, I like the easier readability of the messages. Most of

> > the links still seem to come through, but not all of them.

> >

> > I miss the colors. I find I can no longer use color to highlight

> > important parts of a message. Also, I miss the colors that others

> > use. I suspect that the use of bold or italics has also

> > disappeared. I haven't experimented with different type fonts and

> > sizes.

> >

> > What have YOU noticed?

> >

> > Zoe

> >

> > I've written to the moderators of the Natural Thyroid Hormone

> > group to ask about their email settings. They say that they have

> > it set to no attachments, and the links come through fine.

> >

> > I am going to set the group to " no attachments " for a one-day

> > experiment. If we like it, we can keep it that way. Otherwise, we

> > can revert to the way it is now. Let me know what you think.

> >

> > Zoe

> > Moderator

>

> ----------------------------------------------------------

[Guest guest]

I am also discovering that I cannot change the font size any more.

I used to be able to decrease the length of a URL by decreasing the font size.

That enabled it to be on one line, and thus clickable. Now, the larger print

size causes the URLs to be longer, and therefore broken.

Zoe