Guest guest Posted April 27, 2006 Report Share Posted April 27, 2006 http://www.news10.net/storyfull2.aspx?storyid=17136 ____________________________________________________________________ Assembly Committee Passes Bill on Repeat DUI Alcohol Monitor Written for the web by Mark Hedlund, Reporter Electronic ankle bracelets are commonly used to monitor those under house arrest. Now a California lawmaker wants to use similar devices to monitor repeat drunk drivers to see if they've fallen off the wagon. The bill requiring continuous alcohol monitoring for those on probation for multiple DUI offenses passed out of the Assembly Public Safety Committee Wednesday without opposition, according to the bill's author, Assemblyman Rudy Bermudez, D-Norwalk. The monitoring system is an ankle bracelet that measures the blood alcohol level by collecting and analyzing perspiration. The levels can be monitored remotely. The bill in its current form would give the courts discretion to add the alcohol monitoring system to other probation conditions for those convicted of multiple DUI offenses. Bermudez said his bill " targets individuals who continue to drink and drive despite the existing penalties. I believe that a greater use of alcohol monitoring for second and third time drunk drivers will protect the public. " In a news release from Bermudez' office, the system mentioned is called Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor, or SCRAM (shown above). The device is one of two types of alcohol monitoring systems currently available. Several states are already using the system to keep track of repeat DUI offenders. _____________________________________________________________________ The alternative in the proposed bill was EtG testing, daily EtG testing, and apparently there was no opposition. This continuous monitoring is fatal, for instance if SCRAM were on for 30 days that is 1440 tests, bound to read one of the thousands of contaminents, even an office worker isn't safe from environmental exposure. I get contacted a couple times a month with new victims, and the amount of fallibility's are undetermined, yet this seems to be more reliable than EtG! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.