Guest guest Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 what an awful letter. Is that lab owned by any big shot companies like first labs??? HMM sugar coating just in time for XMAS.as far as the lab directive goes..What I have seen of late is that we are to be blamed for incidental exposure..I was NEVER told a damn thing ..and I asked at the lab..They stopped reasonable efforts for reunification in august so no ETG for me anymore..But they did write up a report for the final hearing in February that states that I have refused any testing anyway..NOT we wrote a letter to all saying anything but.ETG due to the issues .Then the reports came out .we sent them out to all. I fear its too late now .. Nice to see everyone again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 " Responisble laboratories, including ours, employ full-time Ph. D. level forensic toxicologiests to help customers interpret test results and understand test limitations. " Gee, What happened to the labs saying....'we do not interpret the results....we just provide the reports'. Maybe they better start getting thier lies straight!!! The inconsistency of what these labs continue to say is INCREDIBLE. They have dug themselves in a hole already....it is to OUR benefit that they keep on digging!! HAHA I didn't hear the fat lady sing yet.....more will be revealed. I KNOW the truth will be uncovered. Our stories have already been substantiated....their's haven't!!! I can't believe they are ignoring the SAMHSA advisory and basicly calling SAMHSA liars also! > > where is everyone?? Have we given up the operation??? Anyone have any > new info to share about the test being used differently??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Access over 1 million songs - Music Unlimited. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 You know, reading over what I just posted (copied and pasted) as a quote from that Sterling WSJ letter...I saw all the poor spelling and checked back to make sure it didn't get messed up in copying. It is written exactly that way! You would think a responsible(or should I write responisble) Phd like Dr. Baker, who wrote the letter, would make sure his spelling is correct...this is the type of guy who is 'helping his clients interpret these tests'!!! I KNOW I can't spell....but then, I don't have a Phd behind my name either...and if it is something important I tend to use spell checker! > > > where is everyone?? Have we given up the operation??? Anyone have > any > > new info to share about the test being used differently??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > Access over 1 million songs - Music Unlimited. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.