Guest guest Posted October 2, 2006 Report Share Posted October 2, 2006 Gerald, It sounds like you should go to Cochlear Implant Facility and get evaluated. Most ear, nose and throat doctors know little about implants. M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2006 Report Share Posted October 2, 2006 A surgeon would be the best person to evaluate your ears to determine which ear may be a better candidate for an implant. If both ears seem physically viable then there is a possibility that you could do very well with an implant on the " bad " side. However, one can never tell how much benefit could be derived with an implant with a good ear or bad ear. We all walk the same path, put our trust in our surgeons and audiologists, pick the implant we feel will best suit our needs....and hope for the best possible outcomes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2006 Report Share Posted October 2, 2006 Gerard I don't think anyone can answer your question for sure are everyone's experience is different and there is no concrete way to predict who each of us will do. In my own case I implanted my " bad " ear and I have had very good results. I now only wear my CI (no hearing aid in my " good " ear although I must tell you my " good " ear is not that good either). When I take off my CI I basically hear nothing. Before my CI surgery I tested in the 90-110 db loss range. With my CI only in my " bad " ear I am now testing in the 20db range. I recently took the single syllable word test and scored 90% which I am told is considered normal. I am currently considering going bilateral. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Connie --- gerard_at_deafinitelyboleh <gerard.francis@...> wrote: > Dear All > > Could any kind person advise me on this? The > question I would like > to ask is, will my hearing performance be better if > I implant a CI > in my bad ear? > > I am 46, teach in a polytechnic in Singapore, and > became hoh 8 yrs > ago because of Meniere's, with 50dB and a 2kHz > ski-slope on one side > and profound on the other. Speech Discrimination > Test Score 67%. > I use a Phonak Claro BTE. After being stable all > these 8 yrs, I > recently lost another 10dB on my good ear and I am > feeling my > horizons closing in although I know many people cope > with less. > > Searching this list, I see that the candidacy > criteria have been > relaxed in some places to 70dB in the better ear and > maximum score > of 60% in speech test. As Meniere's is progressive, > I honestly > don't see the point of waiting long years for my > good ear to decline > further before finally fitting a CI if I am headed > down that path > anyway. > > I don't perform very well with my hearing compared > to some other hoh > I know, and people I read on the lists. I do > practice the usual > coping strategies. But group discussions of more > than 4 are > difficult for me to follow. I hear very little at > big meetings and > briefings. In my classes, I walk up to a student > with a question and > they will have to repeat, sometimes twice. I would > leave this job if > any students feedback on the evaluations that I am > losing > effectiveness. That has not happened but I do lose > some of the > pleasure of teaching. I cannot use a Microlink FM > system because of > radio interference. We do not have reserved bands > for ALDs. > > At a minimum, I expect to hear better in noise and > have localisation > with a CI. > > I have raised this to my regular ENT and they will > discuss it at > their doctors meeting and get back to me. They have > my hearing > history and scans. The CI evaluation is quite > informally done here > compared to what I read on the lists. I will pass on > to my doctor > any precedents, and experiences you can give me so > they can make a > good decision on my candidacy. > > Thanks a million. > > Gerard Francis > > > > > " The Miracle at Ohio State " aka Nucleus Freedom Implanted 10/04/2005 Activated 11/1/2005 Surgery: Ohio State University Surgeon: Dr. Bradley Welling http://internalmedicine.osu.edu/article.cfm?ID=2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2006 Report Share Posted October 2, 2006 Gerald Many ENT docs still do not know much about cochlear implants. That is why it is usually advised to go to a cochlear implant center and speak directly with a doctor who specializes in cochlear implants along with thir audiologists on staff. Although I had no discernable hearing in either ear without a hearing aid, I was only able to get very little hearing from an aid in one ear. Being the skeptic I am, I chose to have my worst ear implanted because I was afraid of losing what little residual hearing I had. After being implanted, I must say that I was amazed how well I could hear out of that ear. So well, that I started giving presentations again with Q & A and could hear the questions very well. As far as localization is concerned, one implant does not help with that but that was about the only thing it didn't do. So this year I decided to have a 2nd implant in what was originally my " better " ear. My worst ear has become my dominant one although I do believe that with time, both will equal out. I chose Cochlear Corporation's Nucleus for my first CI and then chose Cochlear Corporation's Freedom for my 2nd CI. The experience and reliablilty of the company and the type of battery and longer battery life (I get 3-4 days before I have to change batteries) were all major factors in my choosing. I am thrilled with my implants and would highly advise them to anyone who wishes to hear well again. Happy Hearing! Carol Boca Raton, FL N24C 3G left ear -12/11/01 N Freedom- right ear- implanted 3/01/06 activated 4/6/06 Would I benefit from a CI? Dear All Could any kind person advise me on this? The question I would like to ask is, will my hearing performance be better if I implant a CI in my bad ear? I am 46, teach in a polytechnic in Singapore, and became hoh 8 yrs ago because of Meniere's, with 50dB and a 2kHz ski-slope on one side and profound on the other. Speech Discrimination Test Score 67%. I use a Phonak Claro BTE. After being stable all these 8 yrs, I recently lost another 10dB on my good ear and I am feeling my horizons closing in although I know many people cope with less. Searching this list, I see that the candidacy criteria have been relaxed in some places to 70dB in the better ear and maximum score of 60% in speech test. As Meniere's is progressive, I honestly don't see the point of waiting long years for my good ear to decline further before finally fitting a CI if I am headed down that path anyway. I don't perform very well with my hearing compared to some other hoh I know, and people I read on the lists. I do practice the usual coping strategies. But group discussions of more than 4 are difficult for me to follow. I hear very little at big meetings and briefings. In my classes, I walk up to a student with a question and they will have to repeat, sometimes twice. I would leave this job if any students feedback on the evaluations that I am losing effectiveness. That has not happened but I do lose some of the pleasure of teaching. I cannot use a Microlink FM system because of radio interference. We do not have reserved bands for ALDs. At a minimum, I expect to hear better in noise and have localisation with a CI. I have raised this to my regular ENT and they will discuss it at their doctors meeting and get back to me. They have my hearing history and scans. The CI evaluation is quite informally done here compared to what I read on the lists. I will pass on to my doctor any precedents, and experiences you can give me so they can make a good decision on my candidacy. Thanks a million. Gerard Francis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2006 Report Share Posted October 2, 2006 Dear Carol and All I really appreciate you sharing your experiences. That better quality of life with a CI is what attracted me to consider this. I know I am asking quite a difficult question. What I need to know is whether my hearing performance with a CI on my bad ear (100 to 120dB)and a HA on my good ear (60dB with ski slope after 2kHz) would be significantly better than what I have now with just a HA on my good ear. If you could describe your audiogram, and the results of speech discrimination test before and after the CI implant, that could help me extend your experience to my situation. To reply to another point raised, we unfortunately do not have a dedicated CI implant centre in Singapore though we are a medical centre for the south east asian region! I go to the ENT dept in a public hospital. This is the department I go to: http://www.ttsh.com.sg/asp/med/cli/cli174.asp and this is another one I could consider: http://www.nuh.com.sg/ent.html Thanks again for the generous advice and really looking forward to your replies. Regards Gerard Francis > > Gerald > Many ENT docs still do not know much about cochlear implants. That is why it is usually advised to go to a cochlear implant center and speak directly with a doctor who specializes in cochlear implants along with thir audiologists on staff. > Although I had no discernable hearing in either ear without a hearing aid, I was only able to get very little hearing from an aid in one ear. > Being the skeptic I am, I chose to have my worst ear implanted because I was afraid of losing what little residual hearing I had. After being implanted, I must say that I was amazed how well I could hear out of that ear. So well, that I started giving presentations again with Q & A and could hear the questions very well. > As far as localization is concerned, one implant does not help with that but that was about the only thing it didn't do. So this year I decided to have a 2nd implant in what was originally my " better " ear. My worst ear has become my dominant one although I do believe that with time, both will equal out. > I chose Cochlear Corporation's Nucleus for my first CI and then chose Cochlear Corporation's Freedom for my 2nd CI. The experience and reliablilty of the company and the type of battery and longer battery life (I get 3-4 days before I have to change batteries) were all major factors in my choosing. I am thrilled with my implants and would highly advise them to anyone who wishes to hear well again. > Happy Hearing! > Carol > Boca Raton, FL > N24C 3G left ear -12/11/01 > N Freedom- right ear- implanted 3/01/06 activated 4/6/06 > > Would I benefit from a CI? > > > Dear All > > Could any kind person advise me on this? The question I would like > to ask is, will my hearing performance be better if I implant a CI > in my bad ear? > > I am 46, teach in a polytechnic in Singapore, and became hoh 8 yrs > ago because of Meniere's, with 50dB and a 2kHz ski-slope on one side > and profound on the other. Speech Discrimination Test Score 67%. > I use a Phonak Claro BTE. After being stable all these 8 yrs, I > recently lost another 10dB on my good ear and I am feeling my > horizons closing in although I know many people cope with less. > > Searching this list, I see that the candidacy criteria have been > relaxed in some places to 70dB in the better ear and maximum score > of 60% in speech test. As Meniere's is progressive, I honestly > don't see the point of waiting long years for my good ear to decline > further before finally fitting a CI if I am headed down that path > anyway. > > I don't perform very well with my hearing compared to some other hoh > I know, and people I read on the lists. I do practice the usual > coping strategies. But group discussions of more than 4 are > difficult for me to follow. I hear very little at big meetings and > briefings. In my classes, I walk up to a student with a question and > they will have to repeat, sometimes twice. I would leave this job if > any students feedback on the evaluations that I am losing > effectiveness. That has not happened but I do lose some of the > pleasure of teaching. I cannot use a Microlink FM system because of > radio interference. We do not have reserved bands for ALDs. > > At a minimum, I expect to hear better in noise and have localisation > with a CI. > > I have raised this to my regular ENT and they will discuss it at > their doctors meeting and get back to me. They have my hearing > history and scans. The CI evaluation is quite informally done here > compared to what I read on the lists. I will pass on to my doctor > any precedents, and experiences you can give me so they can make a > good decision on my candidacy. > > Thanks a million. > > Gerard Francis > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2006 Report Share Posted October 3, 2006 Gerard, I can't speak for anyone except my self but my CI has greatly improved my hearing performance. Just today I was tested by my audie. When tested in my " good ear " with a hearing aid I did the tone test in the 80 db range and my sentence speech descrimination was zero. When tested with my CI only in my " bad ear " I tested in the 25 db range and my sentence speech descrimination was 100%. Please remember that there is no way of guaranteeing anyone's results as each of us have our own unique hearing fingerprint. What works for me may not work for you the only thing we each can do is put our trust in our doctors and audies and work hard to try to achieve the best results we can get. Hope that helps. Connie gerard_at_deafinitelyboleh <gerard.francis@...> wrote: Dear Carol and All I really appreciate you sharing your experiences. That better quality of life with a CI is what attracted me to consider this. I know I am asking quite a difficult question. What I need to know is whether my hearing performance with a CI on my bad ear (100 to 120dB)and a HA on my good ear (60dB with ski slope after 2kHz) would be significantly better than what I have now with just a HA on my good ear. If you could describe your audiogram, and the results of speech discrimination test before and after the CI implant, that could help me extend your experience to my situation. To reply to another point raised, we unfortunately do not have a dedicated CI implant centre in Singapore though we are a medical centre for the south east asian region! I go to the ENT dept in a public hospital. This is the department I go to: http://www.ttsh.com.sg/asp/med/cli/cli174.asp and this is another one I could consider: http://www.nuh.com.sg/ent.html Thanks again for the generous advice and really looking forward to your replies. Regards Gerard Francis > > Gerald > Many ENT docs still do not know much about cochlear implants. That is why it is usually advised to go to a cochlear implant center and speak directly with a doctor who specializes in cochlear implants along with thir audiologists on staff. > Although I had no discernable hearing in either ear without a hearing aid, I was only able to get very little hearing from an aid in one ear. > Being the skeptic I am, I chose to have my worst ear implanted because I was afraid of losing what little residual hearing I had. After being implanted, I must say that I was amazed how well I could hear out of that ear. So well, that I started giving presentations again with Q & A and could hear the questions very well. > As far as localization is concerned, one implant does not help with that but that was about the only thing it didn't do. So this year I decided to have a 2nd implant in what was originally my " better " ear. My worst ear has become my dominant one although I do believe that with time, both will equal out. > I chose Cochlear Corporation's Nucleus for my first CI and then chose Cochlear Corporation's Freedom for my 2nd CI. The experience and reliablilty of the company and the type of battery and longer battery life (I get 3-4 days before I have to change batteries) were all major factors in my choosing. I am thrilled with my implants and would highly advise them to anyone who wishes to hear well again. > Happy Hearing! > Carol > Boca Raton, FL > N24C 3G left ear -12/11/01 > N Freedom- right ear- implanted 3/01/06 activated 4/6/06 > > Would I benefit from a CI? > > > Dear All > > Could any kind person advise me on this? The question I would like > to ask is, will my hearing performance be better if I implant a CI > in my bad ear? > > I am 46, teach in a polytechnic in Singapore, and became hoh 8 yrs > ago because of Meniere's, with 50dB and a 2kHz ski-slope on one side > and profound on the other. Speech Discrimination Test Score 67%. > I use a Phonak Claro BTE. After being stable all these 8 yrs, I > recently lost another 10dB on my good ear and I am feeling my > horizons closing in although I know many people cope with less. > > Searching this list, I see that the candidacy criteria have been > relaxed in some places to 70dB in the better ear and maximum score > of 60% in speech test. As Meniere's is progressive, I honestly > don't see the point of waiting long years for my good ear to decline > further before finally fitting a CI if I am headed down that path > anyway. > > I don't perform very well with my hearing compared to some other hoh > I know, and people I read on the lists. I do practice the usual > coping strategies. But group discussions of more than 4 are > difficult for me to follow. I hear very little at big meetings and > briefings. In my classes, I walk up to a student with a question and > they will have to repeat, sometimes twice. I would leave this job if > any students feedback on the evaluations that I am losing > effectiveness. That has not happened but I do lose some of the > pleasure of teaching. I cannot use a Microlink FM system because of > radio interference. We do not have reserved bands for ALDs. > > At a minimum, I expect to hear better in noise and have localisation > with a CI. > > I have raised this to my regular ENT and they will discuss it at > their doctors meeting and get back to me. They have my hearing > history and scans. The CI evaluation is quite informally done here > compared to what I read on the lists. I will pass on to my doctor > any precedents, and experiences you can give me so they can make a > good decision on my candidacy. > > Thanks a million. > > Gerard Francis > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2006 Report Share Posted October 3, 2006 Hi Gerard, If you still have quite a bit of hearing, then stick with your HAs. Because a CI is not a " better hearing aid " . Are you using the most up to date hearing aids out there? Sometimes that is all you need. Your scores seem too high to me to qualify for an implant, and the implant itself will more than likely destroy any residual hearing that you have in the ear that is implanted. 67% discrimination is very high, and a lot to lose when you get implanted. The cochlear implant is a godsend for people with NO hearing, because in most cases it restores it. But as I mentioned, it is not a better hearing aid. It replaces the hair cells in the ear with 22 electrodes. Nowhere near as many as you have with your ear and a hearing aid. Meniere's is progressive, but not often rapidly progressive. Hang on to the hearing you have, and see if it gets worse. Don't rush into an implant. There may be other FM systems you can use besides Microlink. Investigate those possibilities before jumping at an implant. People often do NOT hear better in noise, or have good localization with a CI. Remember you are replacing thousands of hair cells with 22 electrodes. HUGE difference. My suggestion is you ask your audiologist to see what sort of ALDs you could use in the situation you are in. Make sure you have a modern, up to date hearing aid, and work with that. I, too, have Meniere's disease, but was implanted when I had NO hearing in either ears. That was the criteria 9 years ago. You mentioned that there isn't a clinic dedicated to implants in your area. You are aware that you need to have the implant mapped at fairly close intervals the first few months of wear, aren't you? So it would involve travelling to wherever the audiologists are who do this. Good luck, The Original Dear All Could any kind person advise me on this? The question I would like to ask is, will my hearing performance be better if I implant a CI in my bad ear? I am 46, teach in a polytechnic in Singapore, and became hoh 8 yrs ago because of Meniere's, with 50dB and a 2kHz ski-slope on one side and profound on the other. Speech Discrimination Test Score 67%. I use a Phonak Claro BTE. After being stable all these 8 yrs, I recently lost another 10dB on my good ear and I am feeling my horizons closing in although I know many people cope with less. Searching this list, I see that the candidacy criteria have been relaxed in some places to 70dB in the better ear and maximum score of 60% in speech test. As Meniere's is progressive, I honestly don't see the point of waiting long years for my good ear to decline further before finally fitting a CI if I am headed down that path anyway. I don't perform very well with my hearing compared to some other hoh I know, and people I read on the lists. I do practice the usual coping strategies. But group discussions of more than 4 are difficult for me to follow. I hear very little at big meetings and briefings. In my classes, I walk up to a student with a question and they will have to repeat, sometimes twice. I would leave this job if any students feedback on the evaluations that I am losing effectiveness. That has not happened but I do lose some of the pleasure of teaching. I cannot use a Microlink FM system because of radio interference. We do not have reserved bands for ALDs. At a minimum, I expect to hear better in noise and have localisation with a CI. I have raised this to my regular ENT and they will discuss it at their doctors meeting and get back to me. They have my hearing history and scans. The CI evaluation is quite informally done here compared to what I read on the lists. I will pass on to my doctor any precedents, and experiences you can give me so they can make a good decision on my candidacy. Thanks a million. Gerard Francis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2006 Report Share Posted October 3, 2006 Gerard, One thing that might help you is if you remember that a HA only amplifies sound which doesn't necessarily make it discernable whereas a cochlear implant utilizes a speech processor which helps you to understand speech. With a HA, I got zero speech recognition. With a cochlear implant it gave me just about 100% speech recognition so I never used a HA again. Some people chose to continue to use their HA for balance. This is a personal thing. Although there are no guarantees for anything in life, including a cochlear implant, I would certainly think that your speech recognition would be much better with a cochlear implant than with a HA alone. Happy Hearing! Carol Boca Raton, FL N24C 3G left ear -12/11/01 N Freedom- right ear- implanted 3/01/06 activated 4/6/06 Would I benefit from a CI? > > > Dear All > > Could any kind person advise me on this? The question I would like > to ask is, will my hearing performance be better if I implant a CI > in my bad ear? > > I am 46, teach in a polytechnic in Singapore, and became hoh 8 yrs > ago because of Meniere's, with 50dB and a 2kHz ski-slope on one side > and profound on the other. Speech Discrimination Test Score 67%. > I use a Phonak Claro BTE. After being stable all these 8 yrs, I > recently lost another 10dB on my good ear and I am feeling my > horizons closing in although I know many people cope with less. > > Searching this list, I see that the candidacy criteria have been > relaxed in some places to 70dB in the better ear and maximum score > of 60% in speech test. As Meniere's is progressive, I honestly > don't see the point of waiting long years for my good ear to decline > further before finally fitting a CI if I am headed down that path > anyway. > > I don't perform very well with my hearing compared to some other hoh > I know, and people I read on the lists. I do practice the usual > coping strategies. But group discussions of more than 4 are > difficult for me to follow. I hear very little at big meetings and > briefings. In my classes, I walk up to a student with a question and > they will have to repeat, sometimes twice. I would leave this job if > any students feedback on the evaluations that I am losing > effectiveness. That has not happened but I do lose some of the > pleasure of teaching. I cannot use a Microlink FM system because of > radio interference. We do not have reserved bands for ALDs. > > At a minimum, I expect to hear better in noise and have localisation > with a CI. > > I have raised this to my regular ENT and they will discuss it at > their doctors meeting and get back to me. They have my hearing > history and scans. The CI evaluation is quite informally done here > compared to what I read on the lists. I will pass on to my doctor > any precedents, and experiences you can give me so they can make a > good decision on my candidacy. > > Thanks a million. > > Gerard Francis > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2006 Report Share Posted October 5, 2006 Hi and All Thanks for the kind advice and the concerns really. I want to clarify that I am not thinking of implanting my good ear (60dB with ski-slope at 2kHz, and speech discrimination 67%) but my bad ear (totally unuseable, with 100 - 120 dB). So I will not lose my present hearing at all. I consulted a second ENT yesterday at the university hospital at the recommendation of my AVT friend. They have a team of audie, speech therapist and AVT there. Did the scans and hearing tests again. Given my level of difficulty, I am accepted for the CI. I should explain that we get an 80% government subsidy for CIs which is rather generous for our usually tight-fisted government. Medical insurance does not cover CIs here. I am quite confident about this ENT. She has done some 40 children and 20 adults, mostly in the US on a 2-yr attachment or secondment. I am booked for surgery this 17 Oct. I just feel like I am stretching the implant criteria as I have so far not found anyone implanting with my hearing level. So I still wonder what improvement I would get. I expect not a wow moment like many on the list, but maybe something like going from one to two CIs. ly, if I could just hear somewhat (not a lot) better, all the time and rehab effort and expense would be worth it for the extra quality of life. Best regards > > Hi Gerard, > If you still have quite a bit of hearing, then stick with your HAs. > Because a CI is not a " better hearing aid " . Are you using the most up to > date hearing aids out there? Sometimes that is all you need. Your > scores seem too high to me to qualify for an implant, and the implant > itself will more than likely destroy any residual hearing that you have > in the ear that is implanted. 67% discrimination is very high, and a > lot to lose when you get implanted. > The cochlear implant is a godsend for people with NO hearing, because > in most cases it restores it. But as I mentioned, it is not a better > hearing aid. It replaces the hair cells in the ear with 22 electrodes. > Nowhere near as many as you have with your ear and a hearing aid. > Meniere's is progressive, but not often rapidly progressive. Hang on > to the hearing you have, and see if it gets worse. Don't rush into an > implant. > There may be other FM systems you can use besides Microlink. > Investigate those possibilities before jumping at an implant. People > often do NOT hear better in noise, or have good localization with a CI. > Remember you are replacing thousands of hair cells with 22 electrodes. > HUGE difference. > My suggestion is you ask your audiologist to see what sort of ALDs you > could use in the situation you are in. Make sure you have a modern, up > to date hearing aid, and work with that. > I, too, have Meniere's disease, but was implanted when I had NO > hearing in either ears. That was the criteria 9 years ago. > You mentioned that there isn't a clinic dedicated to implants in your > area. You are aware that you need to have the implant mapped at fairly > close intervals the first few months of wear, aren't you? So it would > involve travelling to wherever the audiologists are who do this. > Good luck, > > The Original > > Dear All > > Could any kind person advise me on this? The question I would like > to ask is, will my hearing performance be better if I implant a CI > in my bad ear? > > I am 46, teach in a polytechnic in Singapore, and became hoh 8 yrs > ago because of Meniere's, with 50dB and a 2kHz ski-slope on one side > and profound on the other. Speech Discrimination Test Score 67%. > I use a Phonak Claro BTE. After being stable all these 8 yrs, I > recently lost another 10dB on my good ear and I am feeling my > horizons closing in although I know many people cope with less. > > Searching this list, I see that the candidacy criteria have been > relaxed in some places to 70dB in the better ear and maximum score > of 60% in speech test. As Meniere's is progressive, I honestly > don't see the point of waiting long years for my good ear to decline > further before finally fitting a CI if I am headed down that path > anyway. > > I don't perform very well with my hearing compared to some other hoh > I know, and people I read on the lists. I do practice the usual > coping strategies. But group discussions of more than 4 are > difficult for me to follow. I hear very little at big meetings and > briefings. In my classes, I walk up to a student with a question and > they will have to repeat, sometimes twice. I would leave this job if > any students feedback on the evaluations that I am losing > effectiveness. That has not happened but I do lose some of the > pleasure of teaching. I cannot use a Microlink FM system because of > radio interference. We do not have reserved bands for ALDs. > > At a minimum, I expect to hear better in noise and have localisation > with a CI. > > I have raised this to my regular ENT and they will discuss it at > their doctors meeting and get back to me. They have my hearing > history and scans. The CI evaluation is quite informally done here > compared to what I read on the lists. I will pass on to my doctor > any precedents, and experiences you can give me so they can make a > good decision on my candidacy. > > Thanks a million. > > Gerard Francis > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2006 Report Share Posted October 5, 2006 Gerard, I say if you are approved and implanting your bad ear, go for it! I was recently activated and my hearing loss in both ears was about the same pre-surgery. My audiogram had me at 20db at 250 hz sharply sloping to 100 db at 1000 hz in both ears. I used two Phonak Savia 311 BTE hearing aids with FM. My speech discrimination was 40% in my right ear and 45% in left ear with 62% bilaterally in Dec. 2005. Insurance is tight in Alabama, so I had to wait until my bilateral speech discrimination fell to 50% or less-- which it did when I re-tested in July. I had my right ear implanted, even though the score in July actually had my left ear a little worse this time. I'm not sure what the final scores were in July, but they told me it was down across the board. I understood speech on activation day, and my hearing is continuing to improve. I am able to use the phone with the CI only, and I love it! I wish you all the best on your upcoming surgery. I am sure you will do very well with it. It is a HUGE improvement for me. Lynn Fairhope, AL Nucleus Freedom Surgery date: 9/6/06 Activation date: 9/27/06 Re: Would I benefit from a CI? Hi and All Thanks for the kind advice and the concerns really. I want to clarify that I am not thinking of implanting my good ear (60dB with ski-slope at 2kHz, and speech discrimination 67%) but my bad ear (totally unuseable, with 100 - 120 dB). So I will not lose my present hearing at all. I consulted a second ENT yesterday at the university hospital at the recommendation of my AVT friend. They have a team of audie, speech therapist and AVT there. Did the scans and hearing tests again. Given my level of difficulty, I am accepted for the CI. I should explain that we get an 80% government subsidy for CIs which is rather generous for our usually tight-fisted government. Medical insurance does not cover CIs here. I am quite confident about this ENT. She has done some 40 children and 20 adults, mostly in the US on a 2-yr attachment or secondment. I am booked for surgery this 17 Oct. I just feel like I am stretching the implant criteria as I have so far not found anyone implanting with my hearing level. So I still wonder what improvement I would get. I expect not a wow moment like many on the list, but maybe something like going from one to two CIs. ly, if I could just hear somewhat (not a lot) better, all the time and rehab effort and expense would be worth it for the extra quality of life. Best regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.