Guest guest Posted November 13, 2003 Report Share Posted November 13, 2003 Thanks Dora a Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2003 Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 The discussion of the promontory Stimulation test keeps coming up on the forums.I did have to have the test because I was profoundly deaf.I became curious at the mention that it is no longer done so I contacted Cochlear Americas.Here is the response that I received from Anne Beiter M.S.,FAAA,CC-A,SLP Global Clinical Coordinator ..Director ,Education and Training Cochlear Americas. Regarding your question regarding the validity of the promontory stimulation test or " prom Stim " :Promontory stimulation is certainly a valid test.However,due to changes in candidacy criteria it is no longer done on a routine basis.Originally,the prom stim test was used primarily on individuals who were profoundly deaf,and/or long termed deafened who did not exhibit any measureable auditory responses.For these individuals,the promontory test was used to assess the general viability of the auditory nerve for electrical stimulation.Today,with current implant candidacy criteria,many candidates including those in the profoundly deaf range have some measureable hearing that is not just vibrotactile in nature.If the person has an auditory response then we know that the nerve has some viability,therefore a promontory stim test is typically not indicated. Currently,promontory stimulation is reccomended for those individuals who do not exhibit any auditory response across the frequency range and/or for those with specific etiologies such as bone fracture{or very severe meningitis with no auditory responses}where we are very concerned about viability of the nerve.It is also worth noting that some of the other early promontory stimulation units{not Cochlears}used sine waves{voltages} as opposed to to charge balanced square waves{in current micro amps}to generate the stimulus.Using the sine wave devices it was possible to generate nonauditory percepts{like facial stimulation}before reaching an auditory threshold.Thus,it was possible for individuals tested with sine waves to have no auditory response to the prom.stim test,since their non auditory percept thresholds was reached before the auditory response could be measured,yet have a positive result with the implant{meaning they could hear with the implant}This is a major reason for the " poor " reputation of the prom .stim test.However ,the bottom line is: with an appropriate stimulus this is a valid test.It is just not needed as much as it used to be given the expansion of candidacy criteria. Dora Weber Nucleus Volunteer Advocate dora_weber@... Bilateral N22-96 N24C-01 Cochlear Otosclerosis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.