Guest guest Posted July 30, 2006 Report Share Posted July 30, 2006 Sorry, Carol I meant "aflotoxin" in that particular brand of algae. It does still come Klamath Lake, right? There used to be a warning published to the effect if you have liver issues not to take this product. Shari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2006 Report Share Posted July 30, 2006 Giving this a shot in my bread machine tomorrow. From Bob's Red Mill: Bob's Red Mill 7-Grain Salt-Free Bread for the Breadmaker... 1 1/2 lb. loaf 2/3 cup 7-grain cereal (I use 6-grain) 1 cup boiling water 2 tsp. vegetable oil 4 tsp. honey grated rind from 1 orange 2 cups whole wheat flour 4 tsp. vital wheat gluten 2 1/2 tsp. active dry yeast Soaking grains in boiling water is an old European technique. This modern version is quickly assembled in a bread machine, then allowed to set for 12-24 hours while grains absorb moisture and soften, yielding a bread that is moist and nutritious with a hint of orange. Place ingredients in bread pan in the order listed. Select white/basic setting. Using the delay feature on your bread machine, program the bread to be finished in 12-24 hours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2006 Report Share Posted July 30, 2006 Hi Shari, I have no idea where you would have read that warning, unless from some unscrupulous websites. Maybe you mean anatoxin-a? One individual was responsible for a great deal of miscommunication regarding anatoxin-a, information which is still accessible on many Internet sites. The company sued Mark Thorson for posting defamatory statements about the company, its products, and its personnel to various Internet or Usenet news groups. The lawsuit against Mr. Thorson has now been settled. As part of the settlement agreement, Mr. Thorson has posted the Retraction Statement that appears below. Although he did retract the allegations that he had been widely circulating, we all know that one cannot, with a single correct statement, undo all the harm done by many mis-statements that continue to circulate. The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to various newsgroups: " Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer " During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and other newsgroups a file of information called 'An Anatoxin-a Primer.' I now retract the statements made in the Anatoxin-a Primer. " The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized as addictive), and that the company deliberately avoids testing for this toxin because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users. I have since been advised that the company conducts regular tests that would disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super Blue Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a Primer, and I hereby retract it in full. " If you are interested any further, I can send you the link to where world renowned algae scientists discuss the harvesting methods. Carol Posted by: " SV " shavig@... shavig Sorry, Carol I meant " aflotoxin " in that particular brand of algae. It does still come Klamath Lake, right? There used to be a warning published to the effect if you have liver issues not to take this product. Shari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2006 Report Share Posted July 31, 2006 Hi Shari - That guy Mark Thorson, who wrote the " Anatoxin-a Primer " implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake contains anatoxin-a (which he characterized as addictive), and he said that the company avoids testing for this toxin because he said it is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users. What he was trying to convey was that he thought that all the great effects reported by SBGA users are actually from the toxin, and not from the algae itself. Which is just perposterous because there has never been any toxin found in that algae to begin with. So that's why the company won the lawsuit against him and he had to retract that statement. There are tens of thousands of reported good effects, as many as the people who are using that as a supplement. Carol -- In health , " SV " <shavig@...> wrote: > > Could have been exactly that, but like I said it's been a number of years. I took a class today from a very respected raw food chef and he had some on his table. He didn't use it in any recipes, but he was talking about supplementation and SBGA was one of them. > > I do wonder about this part of the statement however: ... " testing for this toxin because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users. " > > Wonder what " the effects reported by SBGA users " are. Any ideas? > > Shari > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2006 Report Share Posted July 31, 2006 Hi Team! Can someone tell me what SBGA is? Also re: Jungle Juice. Did I read that right - 3 DAYS in a crock pot? Any ideas for those of us with no crock pot? Hope everyone is well. Peace on earth. Cheryl ----- Original Message ----- From: SV health Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 5:26 PM Subject: Re: Re: For Vegans Could have been exactly that, but like I said it's been a number of years. I took a class today from a very respected raw food chef and he had some on his table. He didn't use it in any recipes, but he was talking about supplementation and SBGA was one of them. I do wonder about this part of the statement however: ..."testing for this toxin because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users." Wonder what "the effects reported by SBGA users" are. Any ideas? Shari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.